Literature DB >> 27333062

What Is Everyday Ethics? A Review and a Proposal for an Integrative Concept.

Natalie Zizzo1, Emily Bell1, Eric Racine2.   

Abstract

"Everyday ethics" is a term that has been used in the clinical and ethics literature for decades to designate normatively important and pervasive issues in healthcare. In spite of its importance, the term has not been reviewed and analyzed carefully. We undertook a literature review to understand how the term has been employed and defined, finding that it is often contrasted to "dramatic ethics." We identified the core attributes most commonly associated with everyday ethics. We then propose an integrative model of everyday ethics that builds on the contribution of different ethical theories. This model proposes that the function of everyday ethics is to serve as an integrative concept that (1) helps to detect current blind spots in bioethics (that is, shifts the focus from dramatic ethics) and (2) mobilizes moral agents to address these shortcomings of ethical insight. This novel integrative model has theoretical, methodological, practical, and pedagogical implications, which we explore. Because of the pivotal role that moral experience plays in this integrative model, the model could help to bridge empirical ethics research with more conceptual and normative work. Copyright 2016 The Journal of Clinical Ethics. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27333062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Ethics        ISSN: 1046-7890


  3 in total

1.  Instrumentalist analyses of the functions of ethics concept-principles: a proposal for synergetic empirical and conceptual enrichment.

Authors:  Eric Racine; M Ariel Cascio; Marjorie Montreuil; Aline Bogossian
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2019-08

2.  Pediatric Interprofessional ICU Ethics Rounds: A Single-Center Study.

Authors:  Lulia A Kana; Katherine J Feder; Niki Matusko; Janice I Firn
Journal:  Hosp Pediatr       Date:  2021-03-15

3.  Deciphering moral intuition: How agents, deeds, and consequences influence moral judgment.

Authors:  Veljko Dubljević; Sebastian Sattler; Eric Racine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.