Constance M Weisner1, Felicia W Chi2, Yun Lu2, Thekla B Ross2, Sabrina B Wood2, Agatha Hinman2, David Pating3, Derek Satre1, Stacy A Sterling2. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco2Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland. 2. Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland. 3. Chemical Dependency Recovery Program, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, San Francisco, California4The Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Research has shown that higher activation and engagement with health care is associated with better self-management. To our knowledge, the linkage intervention (LINKAGE) is the first to engage patients receiving addiction treatment with health care using the electronic health record and a patient activation approach. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of an intervention aiming to link patients receiving addiction treatment with health care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A nonrandomized clinical trial evaluating the LINKAGE intervention vs usual care by applying an alternating 3-month off-and-on design over 30 months. Participants were recruited from an outpatient addiction treatment clinic in a large health system between April 7, 2011, and October 2, 2013. INTERVENTIONS: Six group-based, manual-guided sessions on patient engagement in health care and the use of health information technology resources in the electronic health record, as well as facilitated communication with physicians, vs usual care. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes, measured at 6 months after enrollment, were patient activation (by interview using the Patient Activation Measure), patient engagement in health care (by interview and electronic health record), and alcohol, drug, and depression outcomes (by interview using the Addiction Severity Index for alcohol and drug outcomes and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) for depression). RESULTS:A total of 503 patients were recruited and assigned to the LINKAGE (n = 252) or usual care (n = 251) conditions, with no differences in baseline characteristics between conditions. The mean (SD) age of the patients was 42.5 (11.8) years, 31.0% (n = 156) were female, and 455 (90.5%) completed the 6-month interview. Compared with usual care participants, LINKAGE participants showed an increase in the mean number of log-in days (incidence rate ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.19-1.97; P = .001). Similar results were found across types of patient portal use (communicating by email, viewing laboratory test results and information, and obtaining medical advice). LINKAGE participants were more likely to talk with their physicians about addiction problems (odds ratio, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.52-3.49; P < .001). Although 6-month abstinence rates were high for both conditions (≥70.0% for both) and depression symptoms improved (the proportion with scores ≥15 on the 9-item PHQ dropped from 15.1% [38 of 252] to 8.0% [18 of 225] among LINKAGE participants), there were no differences between conditions. Those who received all intervention components had significantly better alcohol and other drug outcomes than those who received fewer intervention components. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Findings support the feasibility and effectiveness of the LINKAGE intervention in helping patients receiving addiction treatment engage in health care and increase communication with their physicians. The intervention did not affect short-term abstinence or depression outcomes. Understanding if the LINKAGE intervention helps prevent relapse and manage long-term recovery will be important. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01621711.
RCT Entities:
IMPORTANCE: Research has shown that higher activation and engagement with health care is associated with better self-management. To our knowledge, the linkage intervention (LINKAGE) is the first to engage patients receiving addiction treatment with health care using the electronic health record and a patient activation approach. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of an intervention aiming to link patients receiving addiction treatment with health care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A nonrandomized clinical trial evaluating the LINKAGE intervention vs usual care by applying an alternating 3-month off-and-on design over 30 months. Participants were recruited from an outpatient addiction treatment clinic in a large health system between April 7, 2011, and October 2, 2013. INTERVENTIONS: Six group-based, manual-guided sessions on patient engagement in health care and the use of health information technology resources in the electronic health record, as well as facilitated communication with physicians, vs usual care. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes, measured at 6 months after enrollment, were patient activation (by interview using the Patient Activation Measure), patient engagement in health care (by interview and electronic health record), and alcohol, drug, and depression outcomes (by interview using the Addiction Severity Index for alcohol and drug outcomes and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) for depression). RESULTS: A total of 503 patients were recruited and assigned to the LINKAGE (n = 252) or usual care (n = 251) conditions, with no differences in baseline characteristics between conditions. The mean (SD) age of the patients was 42.5 (11.8) years, 31.0% (n = 156) were female, and 455 (90.5%) completed the 6-month interview. Compared with usual care participants, LINKAGE participants showed an increase in the mean number of log-in days (incidence rate ratio, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.19-1.97; P = .001). Similar results were found across types of patient portal use (communicating by email, viewing laboratory test results and information, and obtaining medical advice). LINKAGE participants were more likely to talk with their physicians about addiction problems (odds ratio, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.52-3.49; P < .001). Although 6-month abstinence rates were high for both conditions (≥70.0% for both) and depression symptoms improved (the proportion with scores ≥15 on the 9-item PHQ dropped from 15.1% [38 of 252] to 8.0% [18 of 225] among LINKAGE participants), there were no differences between conditions. Those who received all intervention components had significantly better alcohol and other drug outcomes than those who received fewer intervention components. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Findings support the feasibility and effectiveness of the LINKAGE intervention in helping patients receiving addiction treatment engage in health care and increase communication with their physicians. The intervention did not affect short-term abstinence or depression outcomes. Understanding if the LINKAGE intervention helps prevent relapse and manage long-term recovery will be important. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01621711.
Authors: Constance Weisner; G Thomas Ray; Jennifer R Mertens; Derek D Satre; Charles Moore Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2003-09-10 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: A Thomas McLellan; Joanna L Starrels; Betty Tai; Adam J Gordon; Richard Brown; Udi Ghitza; Marc Gourevitch; Jack Stein; Marla Oros; Terry Horton; Robert Lindblad; Jennifer McNeely Journal: Public Health Rev Date: 2014-01
Authors: Jeffrey H Samet; Mary Jo Larson; Nicholas J Horton; Kathleen Doyle; Michael Winter; Richard Saitz Journal: Addiction Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Bridget F Grant; Tulshi D Saha; W June Ruan; Risë B Goldstein; S Patricia Chou; Jeesun Jung; Haitao Zhang; Sharon M Smith; Roger P Pickering; Boji Huang; Deborah S Hasin Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Ruth M Masterson Creber; Lisa V Grossman; Beatriz Ryan; Min Qian; Fernanda C G Polubriaginof; Susan Restaino; Suzanne Bakken; George Hripcsak; David K Vawdrey Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Lisa V Grossman; Ruth M Masterson Creber; Natalie C Benda; Drew Wright; David K Vawdrey; Jessica S Ancker Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Xiaoxin I Yao; Michael Y Ni; Felix Cheung; Joseph T Wu; C Mary Schooling; Gabriel M Leung; Herbert Pang Journal: CMAJ Date: 2019-07-08 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Elizabeth A Stuart; Colleen L Barry; Julie M Donohue; Shelly F Greenfield; Kenneth Duckworth; Zirui Song; Robert Mechanic; Elena M Kouri; Cyrus Ebnesajjad; Michael E Chernew; Haiden A Huskamp Journal: Addiction Date: 2016-09-24 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Hae-Ra Han; Kelly T Gleason; Chun-An Sun; Hailey N Miller; Soo Jin Kang; Sotera Chow; Rachel Anderson; Paul Nagy; Tom Bauer Journal: JMIR Hum Factors Date: 2019-12-19
Authors: Esti Iturralde; Stacy A Sterling; Connie S Uratsu; Pranita Mishra; Thekla B Ross; Richard W Grant Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-11-30 Impact factor: 5.501