Literature DB >> 27332620

Validity and Responsiveness of a 10-Item Patient-Reported Measure of Physical Function in a Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinic Population.

Elizabeth Wahl1, Andrew Gross2, Vladimir Chernitskiy2, Laura Trupin2, Lianne Gensler2, Krishna Chaganti2, Kaleb Michaud3, Patricia Katz2, Jinoos Yazdany2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We assessed implementation of the 10-item Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function form (PF-10a) in routine practice in a racially and ethnically diverse population with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Objectives were to determine feasibility of implementing PF-10a in the electronic health record (EHR) and PF-10a validity and longitudinal responsiveness.
METHODS: Clinical and demographic data were abstracted from EHRs for all RA patients seen at a university-based rheumatology clinic between February 2013 and February 2015. We evaluated floor and ceiling (edge) effects and construct validity of PF-10a in a subgroup of patients with Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores (n = 189). We used linear mixed-effects models to assess responsiveness of PF-10a to longitudinal changes in the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) for patients in the entire clinical cohort, with both scores recorded on at least 2 encounters (n = 326).
RESULTS: Half of the patients were nonwhite, and 15% were non-English speakers. Over a 2-year period, PF10a was successfully implemented; 97% of patients and 89% of encounters had at least 1 measurement performed. PF-10a had fewer ceiling (defined as best) effects than the HAQ (8% versus 22%), and convergent validity was high (r = -0.85). PF-10a was sensitive to expected differences (older versus younger patients, more versus less active disease). Longitudinal changes in PF-10a were highly associated with changes in the CDAI score (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: PF-10a was feasible to implement in a diverse RA population. It strongly correlates with the HAQ but has fewer ceiling effects and is responsive to changes in RA disease activity, suggesting its validity for use in routine clinical practice.
© 2016, American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27332620      PMCID: PMC6369925          DOI: 10.1002/acr.22956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)        ISSN: 2151-464X            Impact factor:   4.794


  33 in total

Review 1.  Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Norman; Jeff A Sloan; Kathleen W Wyrwich
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  Dennis Revicki; Ron D Hays; David Cella; Jeff Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Logistics of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: an overview and practical examples.

Authors:  Matthias Rose; Andrea Bezjak
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Changes in Health Assessment Questionnaire disability scores over five years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared with the general population.

Authors:  Tuulikki Sokka; Hannu Kautiainen; Pekka Hannonen; Theodore Pincus
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2006-10

Review 5.  Quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  T K Kvien; T Uhlig
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Health-related quality of life: validity, reliability, and responsiveness of SF-36, 15D, EQ-5D [corrected] RAQoL, and HAQ in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Louise Linde; Jan Sørensen; Mikkel Ostergaard; Kim Hørslev-Petersen; Merete Lund Hetland
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  Progress in assessing physical function in arthritis: PROMIS short forms and computerized adaptive testing.

Authors:  James F Fries; David Cella; Matthias Rose; Eswar Krishnan; Bonnie Bruce
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.666

8.  Survival in rheumatoid arthritis: a population-based analysis of trends over 40 years.

Authors:  Sherine E Gabriel; Cynthia S Crowson; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Michele F Doran; Carl Turesson; W Michael O'Fallon; Eric L Matteson
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2003-01

9.  Acute phase reactants add little to composite disease activity indices for rheumatoid arthritis: validation of a clinical activity score.

Authors:  Daniel Aletaha; Valerie P K Nell; Tanja Stamm; Martin Uffmann; Stephan Pflugbeil; Klaus Machold; Josef S Smolen
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 5.156

Review 10.  Epidemiological studies in incidence, prevalence, mortality, and comorbidity of the rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Sherine E Gabriel; Kaleb Michaud
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  6 in total

1.  Responsiveness of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Starting or Switching a Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug.

Authors:  Alyssa Wohlfahrt; Clifton O Bingham; Wendy Marder; Kristine Phillips; Marcy B Bolster; Larry W Moreland; Zhi Zhang; Tuhina Neogi; Yvonne C Lee
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  Three Quality Improvement Initiatives and Performance of Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Measures in Electronic Health Records: Results From an Interrupted Time Series Study.

Authors:  Julie Gandrup; Jing Li; Zara Izadi; Milena Gianfrancesco; Torkell Ellingsen; Jinoos Yazdany; Gabriela Schmajuk
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  2019 American College of Rheumatology Recommended Patient-Reported Functional Status Assessment Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Claire E H Barber; JoAnn Zell; Jinoos Yazdany; Aileen M Davis; Laura Cappelli; Linda Ehrlich-Jones; Donna Everix; J Carter Thorne; Victoria Bohm; Lisa Suter; Alex Limanni; Kaleb Michaud
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 4.794

4.  What Does the Patient Global Health Assessment in Rheumatoid Arthritis Really Tell Us? Contribution of Specific Dimensions of Health-Related Quality of Life.

Authors:  Ethan T Craig; Jamie Perin; Scott Zeger; Jeffrey R Curtis; Vivian P Bykerk; Clifton O Bingham; Susan J Bartlett
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  The 8-foot up and go test is the best way to assess physical function in the rheumatoid arthritis clinic.

Authors:  Thomas J Wilkinson; Andrew B Lemmey; Rebecca J Clayton; Jeremy G Jones; Thomas D O'Brien
Journal:  Rheumatol Adv Pract       Date:  2017-12-08

6.  Capturing a Patient-Reported Measure of Physical Function Through an Online Electronic Health Record Patient Portal in an Ambulatory Clinic: Implementation Study.

Authors:  Jing Li; Jinoos Yazdany; Laura Trupin; Zara Izadi; Milena Gianfrancesco; Sarah Goglin; Gabriela Schmajuk
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2018-05-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.