| Literature DB >> 27331404 |
Yuki Hachiya1,2, Aya Kawasaki1,2, Shomi Oka1,3, Yuya Kondo2,4, Satoshi Ito4,5, Isao Matsumoto2,4, Makio Kusaoi6, Hirofumi Amano6, Akiko Suda7,8, Keigo Setoguchi9, Tatsuo Nagai10, Kota Shimada11, Shoji Sugii11, Akira Okamoto12, Noriyuki Chiba13, Eiichi Suematsu14, Shigeru Ohno8, Masao Katayama15, Hajime Kono16, Shunsei Hirohata10, Yoshinari Takasaki6, Hiroshi Hashimoto17, Takayuki Sumida2,4, Shouhei Nagaoka7, Shigeto Tohma3, Hiroshi Furukawa1,2,3, Naoyuki Tsuchiya1,2.
Abstract
HLA-G plays a role in fetal-maternal tolerance as well as immunoregulation, and has been suggested to be involved in autoimmune diseases and cancers. HLA-G encodes two potentially functional polymorphisms in the 3' untranslated region, 14bp insertion/deletion (14bp indel, rs371194629) and a single nucleotide polymorphism rs1063320, previously reported to affect HLA-G expression level or splicing isoform and to be associated with susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, the results of SLE association studies are inconsistent, probably due to the small sample size of each study and lack of consideration of linkage disequilibrium (LD) with HLA-class II haplotypes in each population. In this study, we performed association studies of these polymorphisms on 843 patients with SLE and 778 healthy controls in a Japanese population, in many of whom HLA-DRB1 alleles have been genotyped at the four-digit level. LD was detected between DRB1*13:02, protective against multiple autoimmune diseases in the Japanese, and the rs1063320 G (D' = 0.86, r2 = 0.02) and with 14bp del (D' = 0.62, r2 = 0.01), but not between SLE-susceptible DRB1*15:01 and HLA-G. Although significant association with overall SLE was not detected, 14bp ins allele was significantly associated with SLE with the age of onset <20 years, when compared with healthy controls (P = 0.0067, PFDR = 0.039, OR 1.44, additive model) or with SLE patients with the age of onset ≥20 (P = 0.033, PFDR = 0.0495, OR 2.09, additive model). This association remained significant after conditioning on DRB1*13:02 or DRB1*15:01. On the other hand, significant association was detected between rs1063320 C and anti-RNP antibody and anti-Sm antibody positive SLE, which was dependent on negative LD with DRB1*13:02. eQTL analysis showed reduced HLA-G mRNA level in 14bp ins/ins individuals. In conclusion, our observations showed that HLA-G 14bp ins allele represents a genetic contribution on early-onset SLE independent of DRB1.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27331404 PMCID: PMC4917238 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158065
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Patients and healthy controls examined in this study.
| Subjects | n | % |
|---|---|---|
| all SLE | 843 | |
| age of onset <20 | 144 | 18.6% |
| nephropathy (+) | 397 | 49.6% |
| anti-dsDNA Ab (+) | 654 | 82.4% |
| anti-Sm Ab (+) | 252 | 32.5% |
| anti-RNP Ab (+) | 254 | 40.4% |
| HC | 778 |
*Proportion of the patients of each subcategory among those with available data. Ab: antibody, HC: healthy controls.
Fig 1Genotyping for HLA-G 14 indel polymorphism.
(Left) Primers were placed to encompass the 14bp indel site between primers. (Right) Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the PCR products. The upper band in the ins/del lane shows the heteroduplex product formed by the ins and del allele products, which takes altered conformation and shows retardation in electrophoretic mobility. Ins, insertion; del, non-insertion.
Case-control analysis of 14bp indel polymorphism with SLE and its clinical subsets.
| n | genotype (%) | allele (%) | additive model | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ins/ins | ins/del | del/del | Ins | P | PFDR | OR | (95%CI) | ||
| all SLE | 843 | 56 (6.6) | 351(41.6) | 436(51.7) | 463(27.5) | 0.12 | 1.13 | (0.97–1.33) | |
| age of onset <20 | 144 | 17(11.8) | 61(42.4) | 66(45.8) | 95(33.0) | 0.0067 | 0.039 | 1.44 | (1.10–1.87) |
| nephropathy (+) | 397 | 25(6.3) | 169(42.6) | 203(51.1) | 219(27.6) | 0.19 | 1.14 | (0.94–1.38) | |
| anti-dsDNA Ab (+) | 654 | 50(7.6) | 264(40.4) | 340(52.0) | 364(27.8) | 0.096 | 1.15 | (0.98–1.36) | |
| anti-Sm Ab (+) | 252 | 17(6.7) | 105(41.7) | 130(51.6) | 139(27.6) | 0.26 | 1.14 | (0.91–1.42) | |
| anti-RNP Ab (+) | 254 | 18(7.1) | 97(38.2) | 139(54.7) | 133(26.2) | 0.61 | 1.06 | (0.85–1.32) | |
| HC | 777 | 58(7.5) | 273(35.1) | 446(57.4) | 389(25.0) | ref | |||
Logistic regression analysis was used to test the association of 14bp indel under the additive model. Ins: insertion, del: non-insertion, OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, ref: referent, Ab: antibody, HC: healthy controls.
Case-case analysis on the association of rs1063320 with anti-Sm and anti-RNP antibody-positive SLE and antibody-negative SLE.
| n | genotype (%) | allele (%) | additive model | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G/G | G/C | C/C | C | P | OR | (95%CI) | ||
| anti-Sm Ab (+) SLE | 252 | 116(46.0) | 102(40.5) | 34(13.5) | 170(33.7) | 0.082 | 1.22 | (0.97–1.52) |
| anti-Sm Ab (-) SLE | 523 | 265(50.7) | 210(40.2) | 48(9.2) | 206(29.3) | ref | ||
| anti-RNP Ab (+) SLE | 254 | 114(44.9) | 107(42.1) | 33(13.0) | 173(34.1) | 0.15 | 1.19 | (0.94–1.51) |
| anti-RNP Ab (-) SLE | 374 | 185(49.5) | 153(40.9) | 36(9.6) | 225(30.1) | ref | ||
Logistic regression analysis was performed to compare the rs1063320 genotypes between SLE patients positive (+) and negative (-) for anti-Sm and anti-RNP antibodies (Ab). OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, ref, referent.
Case-case analysis on the association of 14bp ins polymorphism with early age of onset of SLE.
| n | genotype (%) | allele (%) | additive model | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ins/ins | ins/del | del/del | ins | P | PFDR | OR | (95%CI) | ||
| age of onset <20 | 144 | 17(11.8) | 61(42.4) | 66(45.8) | 95 (33.0) | 0.033 | 0.0495 | 1.36 | (1.02–1.80) |
| age of onset ≥20 | 632 | 38 (6.0) | 263 (41.6) | 331(52.4) | 339 (26.8) | ref | |||
Logistic regression analysis was performed to compare the 14bp indel genotypes between SLE patients with the age of onset <20 and ≥20 years. OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval.
Case-control analysis of rs1063320 with SLE and its clinical subsets.
| n | genotype (%) | allele (%) | additive model | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G/G | G/C | C/C | C | P | PFDR | OR | (95%CI) | ||
| all SLE | 843 | 408(48.4) | 349(41.4) | 86(10.2) | 521(30.9) | 0.096 | 1.14 | (0.98–1.32) | |
| age of onset <20 | 144 | 76(52.8) | 58(40.3) | 10(6.9) | 78(27.1) | 0.69 | 0.94 | (0.71–1.25) | |
| nephropathy (+) | 397 | 189(47.6) | 169(42.6) | 39(9.8) | 247(31.1) | 0.14 | 1.15 | (0.95–1.39) | |
| anti-dsDNA Ab (+) | 654 | 328(50.2) | 257(39.3) | 69(10.6) | 395(30.2) | 0.25 | 1.10 | (0.94–1.29) | |
| anti-Sm Ab (+) | 252 | 116(46.0) | 102(40.5) | 34(13.5) | 170(33.7) | 0.020 | 0.040 | 1.29 | (1.04–1.60) |
| anti-RNP Ab (+) | 254 | 114(44.9) | 107(42.1) | 33(13.0) | 173(34.1) | 0.013 | 0.039 | 1.31 | (1.06–1.62) |
| HC | 778 | 399(51.3) | 319(41.0) | 60(7.7) | 439(28.2) | ref | |||
OR was calculated for the C allele. HC: healthy controls, OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, ref: referent, Ab: antibody.
Fig 2Linkage disequilibrium parameters between HLA-G 14bp indel, rs1063320 and DRB1*15:01 or DRB1*13:02.
LD was detected between DRB1*13:02 and HLA-G 14bp del and, more strongly, rs1063320 G. Only weak LD was observed between DRB1*15:01 and HLA-G alleles. Negative LD was observed between HLA-G 14 bp ins and rs1063320 C (shown in blue matrix in the LD plot).
Conditional logistic regression analysis to evaluate contribution of HLA-G genotypes when conditioned on HLA-DRB1*15:01 and DRB1*13:02.
| Conditioned on: | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| none | |||||||||
| P | OR | (95%CI) | P | OR | (95%CI) | P | OR | (95%CI) | |
| 14bp ins | |||||||||
| age of onset <20 vs HC | 0.0067 | 1.44 | (1.10–1.87) | 0.032 | 1.36 | (1.02–1.80) | 0.044 | 1.33 | (1.01–1.76) |
| age of onset <20 vs ≥20 | 0.033 | 1.36 | (1.02–1.80) | 0.046 | 1.34 | (1.00–1.77) | 0.049 | 1.33 | (1.00–1.77) |
| rs1063320 C | |||||||||
| anti-Sm Ab (+) vs HC | 0.020 | 1.29 | (1.04–1.60) | 0.062 | 1.24 | (0.99–1.56) | 0.16 | 1.18 | (0.94–1.48) |
| anti-RNP Ab (+) vs HC | 0.013 | 1.31 | (1.06–1.62) | 0.072 | 1.23 | (0.98–1.55) | 0.15 | 1.18 | (0.94–1.49) |
Conditional logistic regression analysis demonstrated independent contribution of HLA-G 14bp ins on the age of onset of SLE, but the association of rs1063320 C on the production of anti-Sm and anti-RNP antibodies was dependent on LD with DRB1 alleles. OR was calculated for the ins or C allele. OR: odds ratio, CI: confidence interval, ref: referent, Ab: antibody, HC: healthy controls.
Estimation of haplotype frequencies constituted by HLA-G 14bp indel, rs1063320 and DRB1*13:02 and association analysis.
| haplotype | estimated haplotype frequency (%) | Ppermutation vs HC | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14bp | rs1063320 | all SLE | early-onset | anti-Sm Ab (+) | anti-RNP Ab (+) | HC | all SLE | early-onset | anti-Sm Ab (+) | anti-RNP Ab (+) | |
| del | G | other | 38.6 | 37.4 | 39.9 | 40.1 | 39.1 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| del | C | other | 30.5 | 26.8 | 27.3 | 26.3 | 27.3 | 0.17 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.98 |
| ins | G | other | 26.7 | 32.0 | 28.0 | 27.7 | 24.3 | 0.38 | 0.020 | 0.12 | 0.17 |
| del | G | 3.3 | 2.9 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 7.6 | 1.0 x 10−5 | 0.011 | 0.0089 | 0.038 | |
Haplotype estimation and association analysis was conducted by permutation test using HaploView. 100,000 times permutation was conducted. The haplotypes with frequencies more than 1% are shown. Independent effect of HLA-G 14bp ins-G haplotype from DRB1*13:02 was supported by this analysis. Early-onset: SLE with the age of onset <20; Ab: antibody, HC: healthy controls.
Fig 3Decreased HLA-G mRNA level in 14bp ins/ins genotype.
HLA-G mRNA levels in the B lymphoblastoid cell lines were compared between HapMap JPT individuals with 14bp del/del or ins/del genotypes and ins/ins genotype using regression analysis. Significant decrease was detected in individuals with ins/ins genotype β = -0.338, 95%CI -0.672 –-0.005, P = 0.047). The number of the subjects in each group is shown in the parentheses.