| Literature DB >> 27330856 |
Cem Ekmekcioglu1, Julia Maedge2, Linda Lam2, Gerhard Blasche1, Soheila Shakeri-Leidenmühler3, Michael Kundi1, Bernhard Ludvik4, Felix B Langer3, Gerhard Prager3, Karin Schindler5, Klaus Dürrschmid6.
Abstract
Background. Little is known about the perception of salty taste in obese patients, especially after bariatric surgery. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse possible differences in salt detection thresholds and preferences for foods differing in salt content in obese persons before and after bariatric surgery with weight loss compared to non-obese individuals. Methods. Sodium chloride detection thresholds and liking for cream soups with different salt concentrations were studied with established tests. Moreover, a brief salt food questionnaire was assessed to identify the usage and awareness of salt in food. Results. The results showed similar mean sodium chloride detection thresholds between non-obese and obese participants. After bariatric surgery a non-significant increase in the salt detection threshold was observed in the obese patients (mean ± SD: 0.44 ± 0.24 g NaCl/L before OP vs. 0.64 ± 0.47 g NaCl/L after OP, p = 0.069). Cream soup liking between controls and obese patients were not significantly different. However, significant sex specific differences were detected with the tested women not liking the soups (p < 0.001). Results from the food questionnaire were similar between the groups. Conclusion. No differences between non-obese persons and obese patients were shown regarding the salt detection threshold. However, due to highly significant differences in soup liking, sex should be taken into consideration when conducting similar sensory studies.Entities:
Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Obesity; Salt; Sex differences; Taste
Year: 2016 PMID: 27330856 PMCID: PMC4906643 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2086
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Characterization of the study groups.
| Group | Gender | Age (years, mean ± SD) | BMI (kg/m2, mean ± SD) | BMI, 3 months post OP (mean ± SD, kg/m2) | Major comorbidities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls ( | Female: 14 | 41.0 ± 12.8 (range: 22–62) | 23.6 ± 3.0 (range: 16–28) | n.a. | No indicated |
| Patients ( | Female: 21 | 46.3 ± 10.0 (range: 23–65) | 43.2 ± 5.7 (range: 30–51) | 33.8 ± 5.0 (range: 22–42) | Hypertension: 17 Diabetes: 10 |
Notes.
not applicable
Examples of the salt threshold measurement.
| Participants | Judgments | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NaCl concentrations increase → (g NaCl/L) | Best-estimate threshold (BET) (g NaCl/L) | ||||||||
| 0.16 | 0.24 | 0.34 | 0.48 | 0.69 | 0.98 | 1.4 | 2 | ||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.58 |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.82 |
Liking scores for cream soups.
| 9-point hedonic scale | ||
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Like extremely | Liking area |
| 8 | Like very much | |
| 7 | Like moderately | |
| 6 | Like slightly | |
| 5 | Neither like nor dislike | Neutral |
| 4 | Dislike slightly | Dislike area |
| 3 | Dislike moderately | |
| 2 | Dislike very much | |
| 1 | Dislike extremely | |
Figure 1Estimated salt detection threshold between patients before and after bariatric surgery and controls.
(A) Estimated salt detection threshold (in g NaCl/L) between patients before bariatric surgery (n = 33) and controls (n = 29). Mean values were not significantly different. (B) Estimated salt detection threshold (in g NaCl/L) between patients before vs. after bariatric surgery (both n = 19). Mean values were not significantly different.
Liking scores of soups 1–5 in controls and patients before and after OP.
| Group | Soup 1 | Soup 2 | Soup 3 | Soup 4 | Soup 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controls ( | 3.59 ± 2.31 | 4.24 ± 2.33 | 4.14 ± 2.55 | 3.45 ± 2.41 | 2.93 ± 2.20 |
| Patients before surgery ( | 2.79 ± 2.04 | 2.79 ± 2.38 | 2.88 ± 2.36 | 3.42 ± 2.66 | 2.88 ± 2.66 |
| Patients after surgery ( | 2.89 ± 1.82 | 2.58 ± 1.90 | 2.05 ± 1.68 | 2.21 ± 1.96 | 1.74 ± 1.41 |
Notes.
Values are shown as mean ± SD.
Figure 2Soup liking between patients (as the weighted mean, WM) vs. controls (A) and also sex specific effects (B) were analysed with a univariate analysis of variance with the weighted mean of the soup liking (soup 1 was weighted with 1 and soup 5 with 5) as the dependent variable, group and sex as factors and age and BMI before surgery as covariates.
(A) no statistical difference between patients vs. controls. (B) *significantly lower than males (p < 0.001).