Literature DB >> 27330575

Nationwide Incidence of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (NPH) Assessed by Insurance Claim Data in Germany.

Johannes Lemcke1, Dirk Stengel2, Florian Stockhammer3, Claas Güthoff4, Veit Rohde3, Ullrich Meier1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate the epidemiology of the idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) in Germany.
METHODS: The database of the nationwide Barmer Health Insurance was queried for specific combinations of corresponding International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes and OPS codes (German modification of the ICPM and official classification of surgical procedures) in order to assess the number of patients treated for iNPH and the number surgical procedures associated with the disease in a 10 years period between 2003 and 2012.
RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2012, the incidence of iNPH increased from zero to 1.36/100.000/year.
CONCLUSION: This is the first population-based epidemiologic study on iNPH in Germany covering a ten year period.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; Incidence; Normal pressure hydrocephalus; Shunt surgery

Year:  2016        PMID: 27330575      PMCID: PMC4891984          DOI: 10.2174/1874205X01610010015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Neurol J        ISSN: 1874-205X


INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (iNPH) remains the currently only curable form of dementia. The treatment of choice is surgical drainage by ventriculo-peritoneal shunting. Previous pathophysiological concepts explaining iNPH as a mismatch between production and resorption of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were recently challenged by the vascular sclerosis theory [1, 2]. Sclerotic vessels cannot transform pulsatile into laminar blood flows. Thus, unabated intracranial systolic peaks may press the periventricular brain to the ventricular volume and subsequently cause mechanical damage of ependymal cells. Better understanding of the pathophysiology of iNPH together with advances in brain imaging prompted interest in this condition by health care providers and policy makers. The epidemiology of iNPH in the industrialized countries, specifically the prevalence of the disease among all forms of dementia, is, however, difficult to estimate. Data from Vestfold County in Norway with a stable population of 220000 inhabitants suggest a prevalence of probable iNPH of 21.9 and an incidence of 5.5 per 100,000 [2], with up to 1.5 / 100,000 patients undergoing surgery annually [3]. In Germany, researchers interested in the epidemiology of iNPH often refer to data from the cross-sectional Starnberg study, a door-to-door survey conducted in two rural villages in the Isar valley in Bavaria, Southern Germany, almost two decades ago. The study was originally intended to study Parkinsonism, not iNPH, and may thus suffer from substantial misclassification bias [4]. The researchers claimed a prevalence of iNPH-related gait disorders of 4 / 982 (0.41%). This estimate is not representative for the German population either. Compulsory health insurance in Germany is covered by various insurance bodies and companies. The Barmer GEK is one of the largest statutory insurance companies and provides health insurance for 8.7 million people (about 10% of the entire German population, see http://www.barmer-gek.de). German data safety and protection rules are very strict and limit research activities based on routine administrative hospital and discharge information. Yet, Barmer granted these researchers access to anonymized datasets to answer the following key questions What is the prevalence of iNPH amongst all (Barmer-insured) subjects with signs and symptoms of dementia? What is the annual incidence (n/100,000) of iNPH in Barmer-insured subjects and Barmer-insured subjects with newly diagnosed dementia?

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data Source

Barmer allowed the investigators to search several combinations of hospital diagnoses according to ICD-9 (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision) and OPS codes (German modification of the International Classification of Procedures in Medicine [ICPM], and official classification of surgical procedures). Due to legal restrictions, any data allowing for identifying individual patients, medical institutions or physicians in any form were kept anonymous. The number of individuals insured by Barmer between 2003 and 2012 ranged from 6.8 to 8.7 million. Cumulative data from all Barmer-covered subjects discharged from hospital care between 2003 and 2012 were included in the study.

Query Logic

Based on literature data and own experience and expertise, the authors developed a query logic using seventeen ICD-9 and OPS item combinations to trace iNPH cases (or insured subjects with a high probability of iNPH). Table summarizes the query steps. The number of patients meeting the combinations of criteria of the queries Q1 to Q18 were calculated as follows: Q1 Incidence of Hydrocephalus in Germany To calculate the incidence of manifest hydrocephalic diseases in Germany, the number of patients with shunt implantations within the Barmer insurants population was established by a combination of the ICD code G91* (any hydrocephalus) and the OPS code for shunt implantation (ventriculo-atrial [va] shunt 5-023.00, ventriculo-peritoneal [vp] shunt 5-023.10). The incidence was calculated with the absolute number of events and the total number of insurants belonging to the Barmer health insurance company. Knowing the incidence and number of German inhabitants, we estimated the annual number of va and vp shunt implantations for any cause in Germany. Q2 Incidence of Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus and Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus in Germany The incidence of (i)NPH was estimated by combining the diagnoses NPH (ICD G91.2*) or iNPH (ICD G91.20) with shunt surgery, i.e. vp shunt surgery (OPS 5-023.10) OR va shunt surgery (OPS 5-023.00). Q3, Q4 Complications and revision surgery in patients with NPH The number of patients who underwent revision surgery was queried by the combination of the ICD code for iNPH (G91.20) and the OPS codes for shunt implantation and shunt revision (5-023.00 resp. 5-023.10 AND 5-024*). The query was split into a) va shunts and b) vp shunts. Q4 traced revision operations that were performed in the year following initial shunt surgery, thus representing late complications. Q5, Q6, Q7 Infectious complications in patients with NPH We employed the codes for iNPH (G91.20), shunt implantation (5-023.00 resp. 5-023.10), shunt revisions (5-024.*) and infections (G00.* - G08.*) to derive the number of shunt revisions due to infectious complications. The results were cross-checked using other code combinations (Table ). Q8, Q9 Mechanical complications and over-drainage in patients with NPH Mechanical complications were queried by the OPS for any mechanical dysfunction of hydrocephalus shunt valves (T85.0). To calculate the incidence of patients with over-drainage complications, the ICD code G97.2 was added. Q10, Q11 Diagnostics Q10 determined the frequency of ICP measurement for NPH diagnostics. Q11 targeted the number of patients who underwent surgery after being diagnosed with NPH by ICP measurement. Q12 Prevalence of NPH in Germany The prevalence of NPH independently of a procedure was ascertained by the G91.20 code. Q13, Q14, Q15, Q16 Comorbidity Co-morbidities were evaluated using a combined query for patients who were simultaneously coded with NPH and Alzheimer's disease (Q13) or Parkinson´s disease (Q14). Q15 and Q16 assessed co-morbidity in patients who underwent vp shunt surgery. Q18 Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) Q18 was used to calculate the frequency of ETV procedures for any kind of hydrocephalus.

Statistical Analysis

The prevalence and incidence of iNPH were reported as n/100,000 inhabitants. Since the number of Barmer insurants represent almost one tenth of German population, epidemiological estimates were regarded representative for the entire nation. This study was exploratory, and no inferential statistics were applied. Presuming a Poisson distribution, 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for all rate and ratio estimates. STATA 11.2 software was used for all descriptive analyses.

RESULTS

Incidence

The results of invidual queries are shown in Tables - . Altogether, the annual incidence of hydrocephalus treated by shunt surgery was estimated at 6.94 / 100,000 (Table ). The estimated incidence of iNPH treated by shunt surgery was 1.08 / 100,000 (Table , Fig. ).

Prevalence

According to the Barmer data we estimated total numbers of patients with iNPH in Germany between 8609 and 11363 for the last 5 years of the sample period (2008-2012) (Table , Fig. ).

Revision Surgery

We found a mean incidence of 0.19 / 100,000 of shunt revision surgery within one year after the initial shunt implantation (Table ). This corresponds to the incidence of early shunt complications. Given the incidence of shunt implantations due to NPH of 1.73 / 100,000, this means a 10% revision rate in the first year. The reasons for these revisions also include mechanical and infectious complications.

Complications

Among the annual mean number of 129 NPH patients in the Barmer population undergoing surgery, the mean number of infectious complications according to different definitions ranged from 0 to 1 per year (Table ). Also, the frequency of reported over-drainage events was extremely low, suggesting some underreporting. It is likely that shunt infections and mechanical complications were frequently not coded correctly since only the general OPS code for shunt revision is relevant for reimbursement under German Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) conditions (Tables , ).

Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy (ETV)

The mean annual number of ETV procedures for all types of hydrocephalus ranged from 51 to 487 during the 10-year observational period (Fig. ).

DISCUSSION

This study is the first nationwide, population-based investigation on the epidemiology of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) in Germany. It is based on a representative sample of 7.5 million patients covered by the Barmer health insurance company. The incidence of iNPH calculated in this study resembled to that reported in ten previous investigations. These studies included between 233 and 4.6 million subjects and suggested annual incidence rates between 1.09 and 5.5 / 100,000. The key problem in estimating the incidence of iNPH on a population-based level is the lack of accepted and accurate diagnostic test criteria, introducing misclassification bias. The aggregated sample employed in this analysis comprised 1) patients meeting clinical criteria, 2) patients who underwent invasive diagnostics, 3) patients who underwent shunt surgery, 4) patients who became shunt responders after surgery and 4) patients with unspecific coding (e.g., G91.9 for NPH rather than G91.2 for iNPH). The cohort investigated here resembles a population that may have included a large number of false positives and may have excluded false negatives. Different definitions of iNPH are a likely source for the variation in incidence rates as shown in different studies (Table ). The low incidence of infectious and mechanical complications observed in this study differs markedly from literature estimates which range from 3 to 12% (4;14-17). We recently found over-drainage rates of 30% with conventional programmable valves in a randomised multicentre study (6). Available prevalence data were often derived from selected populations such as inhabitants of nursing homes and are therefore not comparable to the present results. Also, the risk of selection bias may be higher in smaller populations, we could not substantiate a correlation between the reported prevalence data and the population size of the studies (Table ). So, the prevalence reported by the different authors seems to be not very stable. Our findings suggest a 10times higher rate of ETV in all hydrocephalus cases compared to iNPH. This is in contrast to another recent population-based study on 12,845 and 652 (20:1) discharges after ETV and VPS recorded between 2007 and 2010 (18).

CONCLUSION

Based on the analysis of ca. 7.5 million insurants of the Barmer health insurance we estimated an incidence of iNPH for Germany of 1.08 / 100,000 / year.
Table 1

Translation of the epidemiological questions into a query logic of operations of ICD and OPS codes.

No.Epidemiological QuestionQuery logic using a logic operation of German-ICD-9 codes and German OPS codes
Q1How many patients with any type of hydrocephalus underwent surgery in that year?a) G91* AND 5-023.00; b) G91* AND 5-023.10
Q2How many patients with (idiopathic) normal pressure hydrocephalus underwent surgery in that year?a) G91.2* AND (5-023.00 OR  5-023.10) b) G91.20 AND (5-023.00 OR  5-023.10)
Q3How many patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus underwent revision surgery in that year?a) G91.2* AND 5-023.00 AND 5-024* b) G91.2* AND 5-023.10 AND 5-024*
Q4How many patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus underwent revision surgery in that year, but had undergone shunt implantation in another, earlier year?G91.2* AND 5-024* NOT (5-023.00 OR 5-023.10)
Q5How many patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus underwent revision surgery in that year due to infectious complications?a) G91.2* AND 5-023.00 AND 5-024* AND (G00* OR G01* OR G02* OR G03* OR G04* OR G05* OR G06* OR G07* OR G08*) b) G91.2* AND 5-023.10 AND 5-024* AND (G00* OR G01* OR G02* OR G03* OR G04* OR G05* OR G06* OR G07* OR G08*)
Q6cross-check: How many patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus underwent revision surgery within that year due to infectious complications?a) G91.2* AND 5-023.00 AND 5-024* AND T85.72 b) G91.2* AND 5-023.10 AND 5-024* AND T85.72
Q72nd cross-check: How many patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus underwent revision surgery within that year due to infectious complications?a) G91.2* AND 5-023.00 AND 5-024* AND G04.9 b) G91.2* AND 5-023.10 AND 5-024* AND G04.9
Q8How many patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus underwent revision surgery in that year due to mechanical complications?a) G91.2* AND 5-023.00 AND 5-024* AND T85.0 b) G91.2* AND 5-023.10 AND 5-024* AND T85.0
Q9How many NPH patients underwent surgery due to over-drainage complications?a) G91.2* AND 5-023.00 AND 5-024* AND T85.0 AND G97.2 b) G91.2* AND 5-023.10 AND 5-024* AND T85.0 AND G97.2
Q10How many patients with iNPH underwent ICP measurement within a diagnostic pathway?5-029.10 AND G91.20
Q11How many patients with iNPH underwent ICP measurement within a diagnostic pathway and underwent surgery?5-029.10 AND c AND 5-023.10
Q12How many patients with iNPH were coded?G91.20
Q13How many patients were coded with iNPH and Parkinson's disease?G91.20 AND G20*
Q14How many patients were coded with iNPH and Alzheimer's disease?G91.20 AND G30*
Q15How many patients with iNPH and Parkinson's disease underwent vp shunt surgery?G91.20 AND G20* AND 5-023.10
Q16How many patients with iNPH and Alzheimer's disease underwent vp shunt surgery?G91.20 AND G30* AND 5-023.10
Q17How many patients hydrocephalus underwent endoscopic IIIrd venrticulostomy?G91* AND 5-022.20
Table 2

Absolute numbers of va and vp shunts implanted for any indication a) in the insurants of the BARMER GEK health insurance company; b) estimation of total numbers of va and vp shunt operations for Germany; c) calculated incidence of va and vp shunt operations due to any indication per 100.000 inhabitants per year for Germany.

Yeara) BARMER GEK health insuranceb) Estimation for Germany c) Incidence (per 100.000 inhabitants per year in Germany) with 95% confidence intervals
insurants (total)va shunt (Q1a)vp shunt (Q1b)Total inhabitants Germanyva shuntvp shuntva shuntvp shunt
20037,478,6032830080,493,00030132290.37 (0.25; 0.54)4.01 (3.57; 4.49)
20047,259,6093339881,844,00037244870.45 (0.32; 0.64)5.48 (4.96; 6.05)
20057,096,1655047481,752,00057654610.70 (0.52; 0.93)6.68 (6.09; 7.31)
20066,961,9883548781,802,00041157220.50 (0.35; 0.7)7.00 (6.39; 7.64)
20076,883,8153052982,002,00035763020.44 (0.29; 0.62)7.68 (7.04; 8.37)
20086,809,2922053782,218,00024164840.29 (0.18; 0.45)7.89 (7.23; 8.58)
20096,780,3702355582,315,00027967380.34 (0.22; 0.51)8.19 (7.52; 8.9)
20108,531,7382154282,438,00020352370.25 (0.15; 0.38)6.35 (5.83; 6.91)
20118,615,6872649082,501,00024946920.30 (0.2; 0.44)5.69 (5.19; 6.21)
20128,658,1073455682,532,00032453000.39 (0.27; 0.55)6.42 (5.9; 6.98)
Table 3

Total numbers of Barmer patients who underwent shunt surgery for NPH resp. iNPH, calculated incidence and estimated total number for Germany.

YearNPHiNPH
nBARMERincidence nGermanynBARMERincidence nGermany
2003640,8668900,000
2004700,96789310,43349
20051151,621325640,90737
20061412,031657861,241010
20071412,0516801011,471203
20081211,781461781,15942
20091672,4620271091,611323
20101631,9115751171,371131
20111441,6713791101,281053
20121651,9115731181,361125
mean1291,731416811,08887
Table 4

Patients with NPH undergoing revision surgery within the year of implantation, reported for Q3a) va and Q3b) vp shunts and patients with NPH undergoing revision surgery in another year than in the year of implantation independent of the shunt type (Q4).

Year How many patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus underwent revision surgery in that year? How many patients with NPH underwent revision surgery in that year but had undergone shunt implantation in another, earlier year?
Q3a (va shunts) Q3b (vp shunts) Q4 (va + vp shunts)
nBARMER incidence nGermany nBARMER incidence nGermany nBARMER incidence nGermany
2003 0 0,00 0 6 0,08 65 9 0,12 97
2004 0 0,00 0 4 0,06 45 11 0,15 124
2005 3 0,04 35 16 0,23 184 17 0,24 196
2006 4 0,06 47 19 0,27 223 16 0,23 188
2007 1 0,01 12 11 0,16 131 30 0,44 357
2008 1 0,01 12 17 0,25 205 25 0,37 302
2009 1 0,01 12 15 0,22 182 27 0,40 328
2010 1 0,01 10 20 0,23 193 24 0,28 232
2011 1 0,01 10 18 0,21 172 31 0,36 297
2012 1 0,01 10 15 0,17 143 21 0,24 200
mean 1 0,02 15 14 0,19 154 21 0,28 232
Table 5

Shunt revision due to infectious complications. nB number of patients within the BARMER population, inc. incidence, nG estimated number of patients in Germany.

Q5a Q5b Q6a Q6b Q7a Q7b
Year nB inc. nG nB inc. nG nB inc. nG nB inc. nG nB inc. nG nB inc. nG
2003 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0
2004 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0
2005 0 0,00 0 1 0,01 12 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0
2006 2 0,03 23 1 0,01 12 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0 1 0,01 12 0 0,00 0
2007 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0
2008 0 0,00 0 1 0,01 12 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0
2009 1 0,01 12 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0 1 0,01 12 0 0,00 0
2010 0 0,00 0 3 0,04 29 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0
2011 1 0,01 10 1 0,01 10 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0
2012 0 0,00 0 2 0,02 19 0 0,00 0 1 0,01 12 0 0,00 0 1 0,01 12
mean 0,4 0,01 5 0,9 0,01 9 0 0,00 0 0,1 0,00 1 0,2 0,00 2 0,1 0,00 1
Table 6

Frequencies of mechanical complications in NPH patients as coded for the Barmer population.

Q8a Q8b Q9a Q9b
Year nB inc. nG nB inc. nG nB inc. nG nB inc. nG
2003 0 0,00 0 3 0,04 32 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0
2004 0 0,00 0 1 0,01 11 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0
2005 2 0,03 23 5 0,07 58 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0
2006 1 0,01 12 10 0,14 117 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0
2007 0 0,00 0 5 0,07 60 0 0,00 0 1 0,01 12
2008 0 0,00 0 8 0,12 97 0 0,00 0 1 0,01 12
2009 0 0,00 0 5 0,07 61 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0
2010 1 0,01 10 10 0,12 97 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0
2011 0 0,00 0 8 0,09 77 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0
2012 1 0,01 10 7 0,08 67 0 0,00 0 0 0,00 0
mean 0,5 0,01 5 6,2 0,08 68 0 0,00 0 0,2 0,00 2
Table 7

Prevalence of NPH.

Year Insurants (total) Inhabitants Germany nBARMER Prevalence (95% CI's) nGermany
2003 7.478.603 80.493.000 0 0,00% 0
2004 7.259.609 81.844.000 368 0,01% 4148
2005 7.096.165 81.752.000 477 0,01% 5495
2006 6.961.988 81.802.000 569 0,01% 6685
2007 6.883.815 82.002.000 703 0,01% 8374
2008 6.809.292 82.218.000 733 0,01% 8851
2009 6.780.370 82.315.000 936 0,01% 11363
2010 8.531.738 82.438.000 961 0,01% 9286
2011 8.615.687 82.501.000 899 0,01% 8609
2012 8.658.107 82.532.000 1000 0,01% 9532
Table 8

Frequency of co-morbidities (Alzheimer's disease Q13 and Parkinson´s disease Q14) coded together with NPH and frequency of these co-morbidities among shunted patients (Q15, Q16).

Q13Q14Q15Q16
YearnBinc.nGnBinc.nGnBinc.nGnBinc.nG
200300,00000,00000,00000,000
200410,011100,00010,011100,000
200540,064610,011240,064610,0112
2006110,1612910,011260,097010,0112
200790,1310710,011270,108310,0112
200850,076010,011240,064810,0112
200990,1310920,032480,129720,0324
201080,097740,053950,064830,0429
201170,086700,00050,064800,000
201260,075710,011050,064810,0110
Table 9

Compilation of all reported epidemiological data concerning the prevalence and incidence of iNPH in the literature [3-13].

AuthorYear of publicationPopulation (n) / settingStudy designEpidemiological data
Lemcke, Stockhammer, Stengl, Rohde, Meier20167.507.537 (±784.241) insurants of the Bamer health insurance company Retrospective query of diagnosis and procedural codingIncidence 2012: 1.36/100.000/year
Jaraj et al.20141238 patients > 70 years between 1986 and 2000 Prospective trial with CT scan and neuropsychological examninationprevalence of probable iNPH in patients between 70-79 years 0.2%, >80 years 5.9%
Muangpaisan et al. 2012233 patients of the outpatient geriatric clinic at Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, ThailandRetrospective query of medical recordsPrevalance 0.9%
Klassen and Ahlskog 2011124,277 inhabitants of Ol- msted County, Minnesota, USARetrospective query of medical recordsIncidence 1.19/100,000/year
Cabral et al. 2011563 cases with neuropathology of dementia illness at autopsy in the Sun Health Research Institute Brain Donation Program database, The Cleo Roberts Center for Clinical Research, Banner-Sun Health Research Institute, Sun City, AZ, USARetrospective query of medical recordsPrevalence 1.6% (of patients with dementia)
Brean, Eide et al. 20094,644,761 inhabitants of Norway (2006)Retrospective query of medical records1.09/100,000/year (> 65 yrs. 30.2⁄00,000/year)
Tanaka et al. 2009567 randomly selected patients out of  1,654 inhabitants of Tajiri, Japan ≥ 65 years (Osaki-Tajiri project)Retrospective query of medical recordsPrevalence of possible iNPH in patients ≥ 65 years 1.4%
Brean and Eide 2008220,000 inhabitants of the south-eastern part of NorwayProspective population based studyIncidence 5.5/100,000/year
Hiraoka et al. 2008170 randomly selected residents over 65 years out of 2516 elderly inhabitants of the town Tajiri (Miyagi, Japan)Retrospective query of medical recordsPrevalence 2.9% patients ≥ 65 yrs.
Marmarou et al. 2007147 patient  in a retrospective chart analysis using the medical records from four nursing homesRetrospective query of medical recordsPrevalence 9 to 14% (depending on the diagnostic criteria) of the inhabitants of the nursing homes
Tisell et al. 2005891 patients who underwent surgery for hydrocephalus in one the six university hospitals in Sweden during 1996-1998 Retrospective query of medical records 1.6/100.000/year (47% of 3.4/100.000/year)
Trenkwalder1995982 participants of a door-to-door survey in the Starnberg community, Bavaria, Germany Prospective population based studyPrevalence 0.41% in patients ≥ 65 yrs.
  13 in total

1.  Prevalence of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus.

Authors:  Daniel Jaraj; Katrin Rabiei; Thomas Marlow; Christer Jensen; Ingmar Skoog; Carsten Wikkelsø
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Prevalence of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus in the elderly population of a Japanese rural community.

Authors:  Kotaro Hiraoka; Kenichi Meguro; Etsuro Mori
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Five-year incidence of surgery for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in Norway.

Authors:  A Brean; H L Fredø; S Sollid; T Müller; T Sundstrøm; P K Eide
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.209

4.  National and regional incidence of surgery for adult hydrocephalus in Sweden.

Authors:  M Tisell; M Höglund; C Wikkelsø
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.209

5.  Starnberg trial on epidemiology of Parkinsonism and hypertension in the elderly. Prevalence of Parkinson's disease and related disorders assessed by a door-to-door survey of inhabitants older than 65 years.

Authors:  C Trenkwalder; J Schwarz; J Gebhard; D Ruland; P Trenkwalder; H W Hense; W H Oertel
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1995-10

6.  MR imaging of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in health and disease. On the vascular pathogenesis of communicating hydrocephalus and benign intracranial hypertension.

Authors:  D Greitz; J Hannerz; T Rähn; H Bolander; A Ericsson
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 1.990

7.  Cerebrospinal fluid circulation and associated intracranial dynamics. A radiologic investigation using MR imaging and radionuclide cisternography.

Authors:  D Greitz
Journal:  Acta Radiol Suppl       Date:  1993

8.  Prevalence of potentially reversible conditions in dementia and mild cognitive impairment in a geriatric clinic.

Authors:  Weerasak Muangpaisan; Chonachan Petcharat; Varalak Srinonprasert
Journal:  Geriatr Gerontol Int       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 2.730

9.  Prevalence of possible idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus in Japan: the Osaki-Tajiri project.

Authors:  Naofumi Tanaka; Satoshi Yamaguchi; Hiroyasu Ishikawa; Hiroshi Ishii; Kenichi Meguro
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Estimated incidence of normal pressure hydrocephalus and shunt outcome in patients residing in assisted-living and extended-care facilities.

Authors:  Anthony Marmarou; Harold F Young; Gunes A Aygok
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 4.047

View more
  6 in total

1.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus and Cognitive Function Before and After Ventriculoatrial Shunt.

Authors:  Ryota Watahiki; Kenji Onouchi; Toru Machida; Kiyohisa Natsume; Kiyoshi Takagi
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2020-08-28

2.  Nationwide hospital-based survey of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus in Japan: Epidemiological and clinical characteristics.

Authors:  Nagato Kuriyama; Masakazu Miyajima; Madoka Nakajima; Michiko Kurosawa; Wakaba Fukushima; Yoshiyuki Watanabe; Etsuko Ozaki; Yoshio Hirota; Akiko Tamakoshi; Etsuro Mori; Takeo Kato; Takahiko Tokuda; Akinori Urae; Hajime Arai
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 2.708

3.  Shunt Intervention for Possible Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Improves Patient Outcomes: A Nationwide Hospital-Based Survey in Japan.

Authors:  Madoka Nakajima; Masakazu Miyajima; Ikuko Ogino; Chihiro Akiba; Kaito Kawamura; Michiko Kurosawa; Nagato Kuriyama; Yoshiyuki Watanabe; Wakaba Fukushima; Etsuro Mori; Takeo Kato; Hidenori Sugano; Kostadin Karagiozov; Hajime Arai
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Current epidemiology of cerebrospinal fluid shunt surgery in the UK and Ireland (2004-2013).

Authors:  Rocío Fernández-Méndez; Hugh K Richards; Helen M Seeley; John D Pickard; Alexis J Joannides
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Secondary deterioration in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus after ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement: a proposed algorithm of treatment.

Authors:  Pawel Gutowski; Sergej Rot; Michael Fritsch; Ullrich Meier; Leonie Gölz; Johannes Lemcke
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2020-03-04

Review 6.  Diagnosis and treatment for normal pressure hydrocephalus: From biomarkers identification to outcome improvement with combination therapy.

Authors:  Pao-Hui Tseng; Li-Kung Wu; Yi-Cheng Wang; Tsung-Jung Ho; Shinn-Zong Lin; Sheng-Tzung Tsai
Journal:  Tzu Chi Med J       Date:  2021-04-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.