Literature DB >> 27330070

An update to the HIV-TRePS system: the development and evaluation of new global and local computational models to predict HIV treatment outcomes, with or without a genotype.

Andrew D Revell1, Dechao Wang2, Robin Wood3, Carl Morrow3, Hugo Tempelman4, Raph L Hamers5, Peter Reiss6, Ard I van Sighem7, Mark Nelson8, Julio S G Montaner9, H Clifford Lane10, Brendan A Larder2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Optimizing antiretroviral drug combination on an individual basis in resource-limited settings is challenging because of the limited availability of drugs and genotypic resistance testing. Here, we describe our latest computational models to predict treatment responses, with or without a genotype, and compare the potential utility of global and local models as a treatment tool for South Africa.
METHODS: Global random forest models were trained to predict the probability of virological response to therapy following virological failure using 29 574 treatment change episodes (TCEs) without a genotype, 3179 of which were from South Africa and were used to develop local models. In addition, 15 130 TCEs including genotypes were used to develop another set of models. The 'no-genotype' models were tested with an independent global test set (n = 1700) plus a subset from South Africa (n = 222). The genotype models were tested with 750 independent cases.
RESULTS: The global no-genotype models achieved area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.82 and 0.79 with the global and South African tests sets, respectively, and the South African models achieved AUCs of 0.70 and 0.79. The genotype models achieved an AUC of 0.84. The global no-genotype models identified more alternative, locally available regimens that were predicted to be effective for cases that failed their new regimen in the South African clinics than the local models. Both sets of models were significantly more accurate predictors of outcomes than genotyping with rules-based interpretation.
CONCLUSIONS: These latest global models predict treatment responses accurately even without a genotype, out-performed the local South African models and have the potential to help optimize therapy, particularly in resource-limited settings.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27330070      PMCID: PMC5031919          DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkw217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  13 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of the potential utility of computational modeling as an HIV treatment selection tool by physicians with considerable HIV experience.

Authors:  Brendan A Larder; Andrew Revell; Joann M Mican; Brian K Agan; Marianne Harris; Carlo Torti; Ilaria Izzo; Julia A Metcalf; Migdalia Rivera-Goba; Vincent C Marconi; Dechao Wang; Daniel Coe; Brian Gazzard; Julio Montaner; H Clifford Lane
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.078

2.  The development of artificial neural networks to predict virological response to combination HIV therapy.

Authors:  Brendan Larder; Dechao Wang; Andrew Revell; Julio Montaner; Richard Harrigan; Frank De Wolf; Joep Lange; Scott Wegner; Lidia Ruiz; Maria Jésus Pérez-Elías; Sean Emery; Jose Gatell; Antonella D'Arminio Monforte; Carlo Torti; Maurizio Zazzi; Clifford Lane
Journal:  Antivir Ther       Date:  2007

3.  British HIV Association guidelines for the treatment of HIV-1-positive adults with antiretroviral therapy 2012 (Updated November 2013. All changed text is cast in yellow highlight.).

Authors:  Ian Williams; Duncan Churchill; Jane Anderson; Marta Boffito; Mark Bower; Gus Cairns; Kate Cwynarski; Simon Edwards; Sarah Fidler; Martin Fisher; Andrew Freedman; Anna Maria Geretti; Yvonne Gilleece; Rob Horne; Margaret Johnson; Saye Khoo; Clifford Leen; Neal Marshall; Mark Nelson; Chloe Orkin; Nicholas Paton; Andrew Phillips; Frank Post; Anton Pozniak; Caroline Sabin; Roy Trevelion; Andrew Ustianowski; John Walsh; Laura Waters; Edmund Wilkins; Alan Winston; Mike Youle
Journal:  HIV Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.180

4.  A comparison of three computational modelling methods for the prediction of virological response to combination HIV therapy.

Authors:  Dechao Wang; Brendan Larder; Andrew Revell; Julio Montaner; Richard Harrigan; Frank De Wolf; Joep Lange; Scott Wegner; Lidia Ruiz; María Jésus Pérez-Elías; Sean Emery; Jose Gatell; Antonella D'Arminio Monforte; Carlo Torti; Maurizio Zazzi; Clifford Lane
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 5.326

5.  Quantifying HIV for monitoring antiretroviral therapy in resource-poor settings.

Authors:  Wendy S Stevens; Lesley E Scott; Suzanne M Crowe
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Computational models can predict response to HIV therapy without a genotype and may reduce treatment failure in different resource-limited settings.

Authors:  A D Revell; D Wang; R Wood; C Morrow; H Tempelman; R L Hamers; G Alvarez-Uria; A Streinu-Cercel; L Ene; A M J Wensing; F DeWolf; M Nelson; J S Montaner; H C Lane; B A Larder
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  2014 Update of the drug resistance mutations in HIV-1.

Authors:  Annemarie M Wensing; Vincent Calvez; Huldrych F Günthard; Victoria A Johnson; Roger Paredes; Deenan Pillay; Robert W Shafer; Douglas D Richman
Journal:  Top Antivir Med       Date:  2014 Jun-Jul

8.  Virological monitoring and resistance to first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy in adults infected with HIV-1 treated under WHO guidelines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ravindra K Gupta; Andrew Hill; Anthony W Sawyer; Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri; Viktor von Wyl; Sabine Yerly; Viviane Dias Lima; Huldrych F Günthard; Charles Gilks; Deenan Pillay
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 25.071

9.  An update to the HIV-TRePS system: the development of new computational models that do not require a genotype to predict HIV treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Andrew D Revell; Dechao Wang; Robin Wood; Carl Morrow; Hugo Tempelman; Raph Hamers; Gerardo Alvarez-Uria; Adrian Streinu-Cercel; Luminita Ene; Annemarie Wensing; Peter Reiss; Ard I van Sighem; Mark Nelson; Sean Emery; Julio S G Montaner; H Clifford Lane; Brendan A Larder
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Antiretroviral treatment of adult HIV infection: 2014 recommendations of the International Antiviral Society-USA Panel.

Authors:  Huldrych F Günthard; Judith A Aberg; Joseph J Eron; Jennifer F Hoy; Amalio Telenti; Constance A Benson; David M Burger; Pedro Cahn; Joel E Gallant; Marshall J Glesby; Peter Reiss; Michael S Saag; David L Thomas; Donna M Jacobsen; Paul A Volberding
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014 Jul 23-30       Impact factor: 157.335

View more
  2 in total

1.  2018 update to the HIV-TRePS system: the development of new computational models to predict HIV treatment outcomes, with or without a genotype, with enhanced usability for low-income settings.

Authors:  Andrew D Revell; Dechao Wang; Maria-Jesus Perez-Elias; Robin Wood; Dolphina Cogill; Hugo Tempelman; Raph L Hamers; Peter Reiss; Ard I van Sighem; Catherine A Rehm; Anton Pozniak; Julio S G Montaner; H Clifford Lane; Brendan A Larder
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  A comparative study of logistic regression based machine learning techniques for prediction of early virological suppression in antiretroviral initiating HIV patients.

Authors:  Kuteesa R Bisaso; Susan A Karungi; Agnes Kiragga; Jackson K Mukonzo; Barbara Castelnuovo
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.796

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.