Literature DB >> 27329212

Anhedonia and individual differences in orbitofrontal cortex sulcogyral morphology.

Hyden Zhang1, Lauren Harris2, Molly Split2, Vanessa Troiani3, Ingrid R Olson2.   

Abstract

Three types of orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) sulcogyral patterns that have been identified in the population, and the distribution of these three types in clinically diagnosed schizophrenic patients has been found to be distinct from the normal population. Schizophrenia is associated with increased levels of social and physical anhedonia. In this study, we asked whether variation in anhedonia in a neurologically normal population is associated with altered sulcogyral pattern frequency. OFC sulcogyral type was classified and anhedonia was measured in 58 normal young adults, and the relationship between OFC sulcogyral type and anhedonia was explored. In line with other studies conducted in chronic schizophrenia, individuals with higher levels of physical anhedonia demonstrated atypical sulcogyral patterns. Individuals with higher physical anhedonia showed a reduced incidence of Type I OFC and an increased incidence of Type II OFC in the left hemisphere compared to individuals with lower physical anhedonia. These findings support the notion that Type I OFC sulcogyral pattern is protective of anhedonia compared to Type II, even in individuals that are not schizophrenic. Overall, these results support the view that symptoms and neural indices typically associated with neuropsychiatric disorders actually reflect quantitative traits that are continuously distributed throughout the general population. Hum Brain Mapp 37:3873-3881, 2016.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gray matter volume; orbitofrontal cortex; physical anhedonia; sulcogyral pattern

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27329212      PMCID: PMC5494202          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  47 in total

Review 1.  Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  A Bechara; H Damasio; A R Damasio
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  Psychological and neural mechanisms of the affective dimension of pain.

Authors:  D D Price
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-06-09       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Representation of pleasant and aversive taste in the human brain.

Authors:  J O'Doherty; E T Rolls; S Francis; R Bowtell; F McGlone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Abnormalities in orbitofrontal cortex gyrification and mental health outcomes in adolescents born extremely preterm and/or at an extremely low birth weight.

Authors:  Eleni P Ganella; Alice Burnett; Jeanie Cheong; Deanne Thompson; Gehan Roberts; Stephen Wood; Katherine Lee; Julianne Duff; Peter J Anderson; Christos Pantelis; Lex W Doyle; Cali Bartholomeusz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Local morphology predicts functional organization of experienced value signals in the human orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  Yansong Li; Guillaume Sescousse; Céline Amiez; Jean-Claude Dreher
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Dopamine receptor transcript expression in striatum and prefrontal and occipital cortex. Focal abnormalities in orbitofrontal cortex in schizophrenia.

Authors:  J H Meador-Woodruff; V Haroutunian; P Powchik; M Davidson; K L Davis; S J Watson
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1997-12

7.  Predictive neural coding of reward preference involves dissociable responses in human ventral midbrain and ventral striatum.

Authors:  John P O'Doherty; Tony W Buchanan; Ben Seymour; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-01-05       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 8.  What the orbitofrontal cortex does not do.

Authors:  Thomas A Stalnaker; Nisha K Cooch; Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Encoding predictive reward value in human amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  Jay A Gottfried; John O'Doherty; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-08-22       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Architectonic subdivision of the human orbital and medial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Dost Ongür; Amon T Ferry; Joseph L Price
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2003-06-02       Impact factor: 3.215

View more
  8 in total

1.  Assessment of Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS): the dimension of anhedonia in Italian healthy sample.

Authors:  Iolanda Martino; Gabriella Santangelo; Daniela Moschella; Luana Marino; Rocco Servidio; Antonio Augimeri; Angela Costabile; Giovanni Capoderose; Antonio Cerasa
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Examining the reliability and validity of two versions of the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT).

Authors:  Hanno Andreas Ohmann; Niclas Kuper; Jan Wacker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  An evaluation of automated tracing for orbitofrontal cortex sulcogyral pattern typing.

Authors:  William Snyder; Marisa Patti; Vanessa Troiani
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Orbitofrontal sulcogyral morphology is a transdiagnostic indicator of brain dysfunction.

Authors:  Marisa A Patti; Vanessa Troiani
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 4.881

Review 5.  Orbitofrontal Sulcogyral Pattern as a Transdiagnostic Trait Marker of Early Neurodevelopment in the Social Brain.

Authors:  Motoaki Nakamura; Paul G Nestor; Martha E Shenton
Journal:  Clin EEG Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 1.843

Review 6.  In vivo electrophysiological recordings of the effects of antidepressant drugs.

Authors:  Paul J Fitzgerald; Brendon O Watson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Sexual trauma history is associated with reduced orbitofrontal network strength in substance-dependent women.

Authors:  Tasha Poppa; Vita Droutman; Hortensia Amaro; David Black; Inna Arnaudova; John Monterosso
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 4.881

8.  Altered orbitofrontal sulcogyral patterns in gambling disorder: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Yansong Li; Zixiang Wang; Isabelle Boileau; Jean-Claude Dreher; Sofie Gelskov; Alexander Genauck; Juho Joutsa; Valtteri Kaasinen; José C Perales; Nina Romanczuk-Seiferth; Cristian M Ruiz de Lara; Hartwig R Siebner; Ruth J van Holst; Tim van Timmeren; Guillaume Sescousse
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 6.222

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.