Literature DB >> 27328725

Effects of a minimalist shoe on running economy and 5-km running performance.

Joel T Fuller1, Dominic Thewlis1, Margarita D Tsiros1, Nicholas A T Brown2, Jonathan D Buckley1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if minimalist shoes improve time trial performance of trained distance runners and if changes in running economy, shoe mass, stride length, stride rate and footfall pattern were related to any difference in performance. Twenty-six trained runners performed three 6-min sub-maximal treadmill runs at 11, 13 and 15 km·h(-1) in minimalist and conventional shoes while running economy, stride length, stride rate and footfall pattern were assessed. They then performed a 5-km time trial. In the minimalist shoe, runners completed the trial in less time (effect size 0.20 ± 0.12), were more economical during sub-maximal running (effect size 0.33 ± 0.14) and decreased stride length (effect size 0.22 ± 0.10) and increased stride rate (effect size 0.22 ± 0.11). All but one runner ran with a rearfoot footfall in the minimalist shoe. Improvements in time trial performance were associated with improvements in running economy at 15 km·h(-1) (r = 0.58), with 79% of the improved economy accounted for by reduced shoe mass (P < 0.05). The results suggest that running in minimalist shoes improves running economy and 5-km running performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Footwear; footstrike; oxygen uptake

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27328725     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1136071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  6 in total

1.  Step time asymmetry increases metabolic energy expenditure during running.

Authors:  Owen N Beck; Eric N Azua; Alena M Grabowski
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Influence of Shoe Mass on Performance and Running Economy in Trained Runners.

Authors:  Víctor Rodrigo-Carranza; Fernando González-Mohíno; Jordan Santos-Concejero; Jose Maria González-Ravé
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Somatosensory Perception of Running Shoe Mass may be influenced by Extended Wearing Time or Inclusion of a Personal Reference Shoe, Depending on Testing Method.

Authors:  James G Saxton; Benjamin R Mardis; Christopher L Kliethermes; David S Senchina
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2020-02-01

4.  What are the Benefits and Risks Associated with Changing Foot Strike Pattern During Running? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Injury, Running Economy, and Biomechanics.

Authors:  Laura M Anderson; Daniel R Bonanno; Harvi F Hart; Christian J Barton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  The effect of footwear on mechanical behaviour of the human ankle plantar-flexors in forefoot runners.

Authors:  Jason Bonacci; Wayne Spratford; Claire Kenneally-Dabrowski; Danielle Trowell; Adrian Lai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Adding carbon fiber to shoe soles may not improve running economy: a muscle-level explanation.

Authors:  Owen N Beck; Pawel R Golyski; Gregory S Sawicki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.