Literature DB >> 27327487

Correlation of breast tissue histology and optical signatures to improve margin assessment techniques.

Stephanie Kennedy1, Matthew Caldwell1, Torre Bydlon1, Christine Mulvey1, Jenna Mueller1, Lee Wilke2, William Barry3, Nimmi Ramanujam1, Joseph Geradts4.   

Abstract

Optical spectroscopy is sensitive to morphological composition and has potential applications in intraoperative margin assessment. Here, we evaluate ex vivo breast tissue and corresponding quantified hematoxylin & eosin images to correlate optical scattering signatures to tissue composition stratified by patient characteristics. Adipose sites (213) were characterized by their cell area and density. All other benign and malignant sites (181) were quantified using a grid method to determine composition. The relationships between mean reduced scattering coefficient (〈μs′〉), and % adipose, % collagen, % glands, adipocyte cell area, and adipocyte density were investigated. These relationships were further stratified by age, menopausal status, body mass index (BMI), and breast density. We identified a positive correlation between 〈μs′〉 and % collagen and a negative correlation between 〈μs′〉 and age and BMI. Increased collagen corresponded to increased 〈μs′〉 variability. In postmenopausal women, 〈μs′〉 was similar regardless of fibroglandular content. Contributions from collagen and glands to 〈μs′〉 were independent and equivalent in benign sites; glands showed a stronger positive correlation than collagen to 〈μs′〉 in malignant sites. Our data suggest that scattering could differentiate highly scattering malignant from benign tissues in postmenopausal women. The relationship between scattering and tissue composition will support improved scattering models and technologies to enhance intraoperative optical margin assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27327487      PMCID: PMC4914603          DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.21.6.066014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Opt        ISSN: 1083-3668            Impact factor:   3.170


  27 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and epidemiological issues in mammographic density.

Authors:  Valentina Assi; Jane Warwick; Jack Cuzick; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Computerized determination of adipocyte size.

Authors:  Tom Björnheden; Bozena Jakubowicz; Max Levin; Birgitta Odén; Staffan Edén; Lars Sjöström; Malin Lönn
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2004-01

3.  The association of measured breast tissue characteristics with mammographic density and other risk factors for breast cancer.

Authors:  Tong Li; Limei Sun; Naomi Miller; Trudey Nicklee; Jennifer Woo; Lee Hulse-Smith; Ming-Sound Tsao; Rama Khokha; Lisa Martin; Norman Boyd
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  Optical properties of biological tissues: a review.

Authors:  Steven L Jacques
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Variability in reexcision following breast conservation surgery.

Authors:  Laurence E McCahill; Richard M Single; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Heather S Feigelson; Ted A James; Tom Barney; Jessica M Engel; Adedayo A Onitilo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Noninvasive functional optical spectroscopy of human breast tissue.

Authors:  N Shah; A Cerussi; C Eker; J Espinoza; J Butler; J Fishkin; R Hornung; B Tromberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Diagnosis of breast cancer using fluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy: a Monte-Carlo-model-based approach.

Authors:  Changfang Zhu; Gregory M Palmer; Tara M Breslin; Josephine Harter; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

8.  Factors correlating with reexcision after breast-conserving therapy.

Authors:  M R Bani; M P Lux; K Heusinger; E Wenkel; A Magener; R Schulz-Wendtland; M W Beckmann; P A Fasching
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 4.424

9.  Rapid noninvasive optical imaging of tissue composition in breast tumor margins.

Authors:  Lee G Wilke; J Quincy Brown; Torre M Bydlon; Stephanie A Kennedy; Lisa M Richards; Marlee K Junker; Jennifer Gallagher; William T Barry; Joseph Geradts; Nimmi Ramanujam
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Optical spectral surveillance of breast tissue landscapes for detection of residual disease in breast tumor margins.

Authors:  J Quincy Brown; Torre M Bydlon; Stephanie A Kennedy; Matthew L Caldwell; Jennifer E Gallagher; Marlee Junker; Lee G Wilke; William T Barry; Joseph Geradts; Nimmi Ramanujam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Label-free optical imaging technologies for rapid translation and use during intraoperative surgical and tumor margin assessment.

Authors:  Stephen A Boppart; J Quincy Brown; Camile S Farah; Esther Kho; Laura Marcu; Christobel M Saunders; Henricus J C M Sterenborg
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Towards the use of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for real-time in vivo detection of breast cancer during surgery.

Authors:  Lisanne L de Boer; Torre M Bydlon; Frederieke van Duijnhoven; Marie-Jeanne T F D Vranken Peeters; Claudette E Loo; Gonneke A O Winter-Warnars; Joyce Sanders; Henricus J C M Sterenborg; Benno H W Hendriks; Theo J M Ruers
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.531

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.