Literature DB >> 18539425

Factors correlating with reexcision after breast-conserving therapy.

M R Bani1, M P Lux, K Heusinger, E Wenkel, A Magener, R Schulz-Wendtland, M W Beckmann, P A Fasching.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate factors affecting the risk for reexcision following breast-conserving surgery. Positive tumor margins are critical for local disease control following surgery for breast cancer. Several factors, including tumor size, multifocality, and an extensive in situ component, may be associated with a higher rate of repeat operations due to positive margins. This study included mammographic density in the analysis.
METHODS: A total of 565 breast cancer patients were considered eligible for breast-conserving therapy after a core biopsy had confirmed malignancy. The patients' mammographic findings were reviewed, and mammographic density was documented in addition to the histopathological features of the lesions. Associations between these factors and the risk for a second operation were analyzed using the chi-squared test, and a model was developed for multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: At least one repeat operation was necessary in 121 patients (21.4%), and mastectomy was ultimately necessary in 54 patients (9.6%). Tumor size, multifocality, and the presence of an in situ component were identified as risk factors. A mammographic density of category 4 was associated with a need for further surgery (OR 3.2; 95% CI, 1.2-11).
CONCLUSIONS: Mammographic density is an additional risk factor for a second operation following breast-conserving procedures, and it may make radiographic and intraoperative localization of the tumor technically difficult. Using mammographic density to define a group of patients with a higher risk of reexcision might allow these patients to benefit from more sophisticated methods of localization and margin assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18539425     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2008.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  29 in total

1.  Automated classification of breast pathology using local measures of broadband reflectance.

Authors:  Ashley M Laughney; Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy; Pilar Beatriz Garcia-Allende; Olga M Conde; Wendy A Wells; Keith D Paulsen; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 2.  Image-guided surgery using invisible near-infrared light: fundamentals of clinical translation.

Authors:  Sylvain Gioux; Hak Soo Choi; John V Frangioni
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.488

3.  Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology versus Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Increases the Quality of Intraoperative Imaging?

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; G Dilbat; M Bani; P A Fasching; M P Lux; E Wenkel; S Schwab; C R Loehberg; S M Jud; C Rauh; C M Bayer; M W Beckmann; M Uder; M Meier-Meitinger
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.915

4.  Topical dual-stain difference imaging for rapid intra-operative tumor identification in fresh specimens.

Authors:  Scott C Davis; Summer L Gibbs; Jason R Gunn; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 3.776

5.  Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus CMOS Technology, Specimen Radiography System (SRS) and Tomosynthesis (DBT) - Which System Can Optimise Surgical Therapy?

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; G Dilbat; M Bani; P A Fasching; K Heusinger; M P Lux; C R Loehberg; B Brehm; M Hammon; M Saake; P Dankerl; S M Jud; C Rauh; C M Bayer; M W Beckmann; M Uder; M Meier-Meitinger
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  Intraoperative Ultrasound in the Treatment of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  H Eggemann; T Ignatov; A Beni; S D Costa; O Ortmann; A Ignatov
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.915

7.  Reoperations after primary breast conserving surgery in women with invasive breast cancer in Catalonia, Spain: a retrospective study.

Authors:  J M Escribà; L Esteban; J Gálvez; M J Pla; A Melià; M Gil-Gil; R Clèries; L Pareja; X Sanz; M Bustins; J M Borrás; J Ribes
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Scatter spectroscopic imaging distinguishes between breast pathologies in tissues relevant to surgical margin assessment.

Authors:  Ashley M Laughney; Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy; Elizabeth J Rizzo; Mary C Schwab; Richard J Barth; Brian W Pogue; Keith D Paulsen; Wendy A Wells
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 9.  The lobar approach to breast ultrasound imaging and surgery.

Authors:  Dominique Amy; Enzo Durante; Tibor Tot
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 1.314

10.  The effect of intraoperative specimen inking on lumpectomy re-excision rates.

Authors:  Mansher Singh; Gayatri Singh; Kevin T Hogan; Kristen A Atkins; Anneke T Schroen
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.