Literature DB >> 2732657

Length-tension relationships of masseter and digastric muscles of miniature swine during ontogeny.

F Anapol1, S W Herring.   

Abstract

At incremental whole muscle lengths, active isometric and passive elastic forces were recorded from the masseter and digastric muscles of anaesthetized miniature pigs (Hanford) weighing 2.0-20.0 kg. Wet muscle mass and maximum tetanic tension values for masseter exceed those for digastric and increase more rapidly with body mass (age). At any body mass, masseter exceeds digastric in the ratio of optimum length (that length at which maximum tetanic tension is produced) to in situ muscle length (that length which corresponds to the jaw in a closed position) and the proportion of passive tension comprising total (passive plus active) tension. Passive elastic tension begins to rise in masseter at lengths as short as 87% of optimum (in younger pigs). In digastric, passive tension is absent until the muscle is stretched to a length slightly longer than optimum in younger pigs but occurs at shorter lengths in older pigs. Contractile properties explain functional differences between masseter and digastric more clearly than they explain ontogenetic changes in either muscle. The behavioural transition from infant suckling to adult mastication of solid food is best characterized by a disproportionate increase in mass (and force) of the masseter, relative to digastric, and increased reliance upon active (rather than passive) tension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2732657     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.143.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  12 in total

1.  Modelling the masticatory biomechanics of a pig.

Authors:  G E J Langenbach; F Zhang; S W Herring; A G Hannam
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Dynamic mechanics in the pig mandibular symphysis.

Authors:  G E J Langenbach; F Zhang; S W Herring; T M G J van Eijden; A G Hannam
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Modeling the biomechanics of swine mastication--an inverse dynamics approach.

Authors:  Ehsan Basafa; Ryan J Murphy; Chad R Gordon; Mehran Armand
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Electromyography of swallowing with fine wire intramuscular electrodes in healthy human: activation sequence of selected hyoid muscles.

Authors:  Haruhi Inokuchi; Marlís González-Fernández; Koichiro Matsuo; Martin B Brodsky; Mitsumasa Yoda; Hiroshige Taniguchi; Hideto Okazaki; Takashi Hiraoka; Jeffrey B Palmer
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Go big or go fish: morphological specializations in carnivorous bats.

Authors:  Sharlene E Santana; Elena Cheung
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Ontogeny of bone strain: the zygomatic arch in pigs.

Authors:  Susan W Herring; Scott C Pedersen; Xiaofeng Huang
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Epaxial muscle fiber architecture favors enhanced excursion and power in the leaper Galago senegalensis.

Authors:  Emranul Huq; Christine E Wall; Andrea B Taylor
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  The morphology of the masticatory apparatus facilitates muscle force production at wide jaw gapes in tree-gouging common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  C M Eng; S R Ward; C J Vinyard; A B Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Bite force is limited by the force-length relationship of skeletal muscle in black carp, Mylopharyngodon piceus.

Authors:  Nicholas J Gidmark; Nicolai Konow; Eric Lopresti; Elizabeth L Brainerd
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Dynamic Musculoskeletal Functional Morphology: Integrating diceCT and XROMM.

Authors:  Courtney P Orsbon; Nicholas J Gidmark; Callum F Ross
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.