Nawar Hanna1, Maxine Sun1, Christian P Meyer1, Paul L Nguyen1, Sumanta K Pal1, Steven L Chang1, Guillermo de Velasco1, Quoc-Dien Trinh1, Toni K Choueiri2. 1. Nawar Hanna, Maxine Sun, Christian P. Meyer, Paul L. Nguyen, Steven L. Chang, Guillermo de Velasco, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Toni K. Choueiri, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; and Sumanta K. Pal, City of Hope, Duarte, CA. 2. Nawar Hanna, Maxine Sun, Christian P. Meyer, Paul L. Nguyen, Steven L. Chang, Guillermo de Velasco, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Toni K. Choueiri, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; and Sumanta K. Pal, City of Hope, Duarte, CA. toni_choueiri@dfci.harvard.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has become unclear since the introduction of targeted therapies (TT). We sought to evaluate contemporary utilization rates of CN and to examine the survival benefit of CN compared with non-CN patients treated with TT. METHODS: We used the National Cancer Data Base to identify patients with clinical mRCC treated with TT between 2006 and 2013. The intervention of interest was CN. Multivariable logistic regression predicting receipt of CN was performed. Overall survival (OS) was examined using Cox regression models and incremental survival analyses were performed. Sensitivity analyses using propensity scores were conducted. RESULTS: Of 15,390 patients treated with TT, 5,374 (35%) underwent CN between 2006 and 2013. Patients who were younger, privately insured, treated at an academic center, and had lower tumor stage and cN0 disease were more likely to undergo CN. The median OS of CN versus non-CN patients was 17.1 (95% CI, 16.3 to 18.0 months) versus 7.7 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 7.9 months; P < .001). In sensitivity analyses using propensity scores adjustment in addition to other available covariates, CN patients had a lower risk of any death (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.50; P < .001). The survival benefit of CN was +0.7 and +3.6 months in patients who survived ≤ 6 and ≤ 24 months, respectively, versus no CN. CONCLUSION: CN is performed in three of 10 patients with mRCC who are receiving TT. Several patient and sociodemographic characteristics were associated with receipt of CN. When feasible, CN may offer an OS benefit when combined with TT.
PURPOSE: The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has become unclear since the introduction of targeted therapies (TT). We sought to evaluate contemporary utilization rates of CN and to examine the survival benefit of CN compared with non-CN patients treated with TT. METHODS: We used the National Cancer Data Base to identify patients with clinical mRCC treated with TT between 2006 and 2013. The intervention of interest was CN. Multivariable logistic regression predicting receipt of CN was performed. Overall survival (OS) was examined using Cox regression models and incremental survival analyses were performed. Sensitivity analyses using propensity scores were conducted. RESULTS: Of 15,390 patients treated with TT, 5,374 (35%) underwent CN between 2006 and 2013. Patients who were younger, privately insured, treated at an academic center, and had lower tumor stage and cN0 disease were more likely to undergo CN. The median OS of CN versus non-CN patients was 17.1 (95% CI, 16.3 to 18.0 months) versus 7.7 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 7.9 months; P < .001). In sensitivity analyses using propensity scores adjustment in addition to other available covariates, CN patients had a lower risk of any death (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.50; P < .001). The survival benefit of CN was +0.7 and +3.6 months in patients who survived ≤ 6 and ≤ 24 months, respectively, versus no CN. CONCLUSION: CN is performed in three of 10 patients with mRCC who are receiving TT. Several patient and sociodemographic characteristics were associated with receipt of CN. When feasible, CN may offer an OS benefit when combined with TT.
Authors: R C Flanigan; S E Salmon; B A Blumenstein; S I Bearman; V Roy; P C McGrath; J R Caton; N Munshi; E D Crawford Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2001-12-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Toni K Choueiri; Wanling Xie; Christian Kollmannsberger; Scott North; Jennifer J Knox; J Geoffrey Lampard; David F McDermott; Brian I Rini; Daniel Y C Heng Journal: J Urol Date: 2010-11-12 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Stephen H Culp; Nizar M Tannir; E Jason Abel; Vitaly Margulis; Pheroze Tamboli; Surena F Matin; Christopher G Wood Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Michael R Abern; Emelian Scosyrev; Matvey Tsivian; Edward M Messing; Thomas J Polascik; Arkadiusz Z Dudek Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Daniel Y C Heng; J Connor Wells; Brian I Rini; Benoit Beuselinck; Jae-Lyun Lee; Jennifer J Knox; Georg A Bjarnason; Sumanta Kumar Pal; Christian K Kollmannsberger; Takeshi Yuasa; Sandy Srinivas; Frede Donskov; Aristotelis Bamias; Lori A Wood; D Scott Ernst; Neeraj Agarwal; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Sun Young Rha; Jenny J Kim; Toni K Choueiri Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-06-13 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Daniel Y C Heng; Wanling Xie; Meredith M Regan; Mark A Warren; Ali Reza Golshayan; Chakshu Sahi; Bernhard J Eigl; J Dean Ruether; Tina Cheng; Scott North; Peter Venner; Jennifer J Knox; Kim N Chi; Christian Kollmannsberger; David F McDermott; William K Oh; Michael B Atkins; Ronald M Bukowski; Brian I Rini; Toni K Choueiri Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-10-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Simon L Conti; I-Chun Thomas; Judith C Hagedorn; Benjamin I Chung; Glenn M Chertow; Todd H Wagner; James D Brooks; Sandy Srinivas; John T Leppert Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-05-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Shankar Siva; Gargi Kothari; Alexander Muacevic; Alexander V Louie; Ben J Slotman; Bin S Teh; Simon S Lo Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Ross J Mason; Lori Wood; Anil Kapoor; Naveen Basappa; George Bjarnason; Stephen A Boorjian; Rodney H Breau; Ilias Cagiannos; Michael A S Jewett; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Wassim Kassouf; Christian Kollmannsberger; Aly-Khan A Lalani; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Luke T Lavallée; Stephen Pautler; Nicholas Power; Patrick Richard; Alan So; Simon Tanguay; Ricardo A Rendon Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Giuseppe Rosiello; Sophie Knipper; Carlotta Palumbo; Cristina Dzyuba-Negrean; Angela Pecoraro; Elio Mazzone; Francesco A Mistretta; Zhe Tian; Umberto Capitanio; Francesco Montorsi; Shahrokh F Shariat; Fred Saad; Alberto Briganti; Pierre I Karakiewicz Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2019-08-29 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: James J Hsieh; Mark P Purdue; Sabina Signoretti; Charles Swanton; Laurence Albiges; Manuela Schmidinger; Daniel Y Heng; James Larkin; Vincenzo Ficarra Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Oscar Rodriguez Faba; Sabine D Brookman-May; Estefania Linares; Alberto Breda; Francesca Pisano; José Daniel Subiela; Francesco Sanguedolce; Maurizio Brausi; Joan Palou Journal: World J Urol Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Tobias Klatte; Kate Fife; Sarah J Welsh; Manavi Sachdeva; James N Armitage; Tevita 'Aho; Antony C Riddick; Athena Matakidou; Tim Eisen; Grant D Stewart Journal: World J Urol Date: 2017-12-18 Impact factor: 4.226