Literature DB >> 27325654

eComment. Is flexible band or rigid ring the best choice for functional tricuspid regurgitation?

Christos Tourmousoglou1, Antonis Pitsis1, Nikolaos Nikoloudakis1, Dimitrios Dougenis2.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27325654      PMCID： PMC4986759          DOI： 10.1093/icvts/ivw165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg        ISSN： 1569-9285


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Increased risk of dehiscence after tricuspid valve repair with rigid annuloplasty rings.

Authors:  Bettina Pfannmüller; Torsten Doenst; Katja Eberhardt; Jörg Seeburger; Michael A Borger; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 2.  Is a rigid tricuspid annuloplasty ring superior to a flexible band when correcting secondary tricuspid regurgitation?

Authors:  Tie-Yuan Zhu; Jian-Gang Wang; Xu Meng
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-08-20

3.  Flexible band versus rigid ring annuloplasty for functional tricuspid regurgitation: two different patterns of right heart reverse remodelling.

Authors:  Giuseppe Gatti; Luca Dell'Angela; Marco Morosin; Luca Maschietto; Bruno Pinamonti; Bernardo Benussi; Gabriella Forti; Gian Luigi Nicolosi; Gianfranco Sinagra; Aniello Pappalardo
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-03-18

4.  Flexible band versus rigid ring annuloplasty for functional tricuspid regurgitation.

Authors:  Hironori Izutani; Teruya Nakamura; Kanji Kawachi
Journal:  Heart Int       Date:  2010-12-31
  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  eReply to eComment: Is flexible band or rigid ring the best choice for functional tricuspid regurgitation?

Authors:  Giuseppe Gatti
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.