Literature DB >> 21798563

Increased risk of dehiscence after tricuspid valve repair with rigid annuloplasty rings.

Bettina Pfannmüller1, Torsten Doenst, Katja Eberhardt, Jörg Seeburger, Michael A Borger, Friedrich W Mohr.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Surgical management of tricuspid valve regurgitation mainly consists of tricuspid valve annuloplasty, usually performed with implantation of a rigid ring or a flexible band.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis on 820 patients who underwent tricuspid valve repair between March 2002 and July 2009 with either a flexible Cosgrove-Edwards band (n = 415; Edwards Lifesciences LLC, Irvine, Calif) or a rigid Carpentier-Edwards Classic annuloplasty ring (n = 405; Edwards Lifesciences). Mean patient age was 69.2 ± 9.5 years, 54.1% were female, and average logistic EuroSCORE was 13.3% ± 12.5%. Concomitant procedures were performed in 94.6% of patients (mitral valve surgery, 80.6%; aortic valve surgery, 28.2%; coronary artery bypass grafting, 24.5%; atrial fibrillation ablation, 44.5%). One fifth of the operations were reoperative procedures. Follow-up was 94% complete, with mean duration of 21.0 ± 19.0 months.
RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was 10.1% (Cosgrove-Edwards, 11.9%; Carpentier-Edwards, 8.4%), and 5-year survival was 62.4% (Carpentier-Edwards, 64.7%; Cosgrove-Edwards, 60.3%). Postoperative echocardiography showed significant improvement in tricuspid valve function, with reduction in tricuspid regurgitation grade from 2.3 ± 0.7 to 0.7 ± 0.7, and no differences between groups. Use of a Carpentier-Edwards ring, however, was associated with significantly higher risk of dehiscence (Carpentier-Edwards, 8.7%; Cosgrove-Edwards, 0.9%; P < .001), almost exclusively at the septal leaflet portion of the annulus. Multivariate analysis identified annuloplasty type as independently predicting ring dehiscence (odds ratio, 10.7; 95% confidence interval, 3.2-36.5; P < .001). Patients with annuloplasty dehiscence had more residual tricuspid regurgitation on predischarge echocardiography than did patients without dehiscence (1.4 ± 0.63 vs 0.7 ± 0.6; P < .001). Ten patients underwent reoperation for recurrent tricuspid regurgitation, 4 with ring dehiscence. Five-year freedom from reoperation was 95.3% (Cosgrove-Edwards, 97.7%; Carpentier-Edwards, 92.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: Although both rigid and flexible systems provide acceptable early tricuspid valve repair results, use of a rigid ring increases risk of subsequent ring dehiscence.
Copyright © 2012 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21798563     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.06.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  20 in total

Review 1.  Tricuspid regurgitation: pathophysiology and management.

Authors:  Rashmi Thapa; Buddhadeb Dawn; Jayant Nath
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Flexible band versus rigid ring annuloplasty for tricuspid regurgitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nelson Wang; Steven Phan; David H Tian; Tristan D Yan; Kevin Phan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-05

3.  Comparison of outcomes of tricuspid annuloplasty with 3D-rigid versus flexible prosthetic ring for functional tricuspid regurgitation secondary to rheumatic mitral valve disease.

Authors:  Haiping Wang; Xiancheng Liu; Xin Wang; Zhenqian Lv; Xiaojun Liu; Ping Xu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  [Tricuspid valve regurgitation : Indications and operative techniques].

Authors:  R Lange; N Piazza; T Günther
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.443

5.  eComment. Is flexible band or rigid ring the best choice for functional tricuspid regurgitation?

Authors:  Christos Tourmousoglou; Antonis Pitsis; Nikolaos Nikoloudakis; Dimitrios Dougenis
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-07

Review 6.  Minimally invasive, beating heart tricuspid valve surgery in a redo case.

Authors:  Martin Misfeld; Piroze Davierwala; Jörgen Banusch; Jörg Ender; Friedrich-Wilhelm Mohr; Bettina Pfannmüller
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-05

7.  Force Required to Cinch the Tricuspid Annulus: An Ex-Vivo Study.

Authors:  Amy Adkins; Jesus Aleman; Lori Boies; Edward Sako; Shamik Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2015-09

8.  Suture dehiscence and collagen content in the human mitral and tricuspid annuli.

Authors:  Immanuel David Madukauwa-David; Eric L Pierce; Fatiesa Sulejmani; Joshua Pataky; Wei Sun; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2018-10-04

Review 9.  Is a rigid tricuspid annuloplasty ring superior to a flexible band when correcting secondary tricuspid regurgitation?

Authors:  Tie-Yuan Zhu; Jian-Gang Wang; Xu Meng
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-08-20

10.  Concomitant tricuspid valve repair in patients with minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.

Authors:  Bettina Pfannmüller; Piroze Davierwala; Gregor Hirnle; Michael A Borger; Martin Misfeld; Jens Garbade; Joerg Seeburger; Friedrich W Mohr
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.