Anna Konermann1, R Al-Malat2, J Skupin2, L Keilig2, C Dirk2, R Karanis2, C Bourauel2, A Jäger3. 1. Department of Orthodontics, University of Bonn, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111, Bonn, Germany. anna.konermann@gmx.de. 2. Endowed Professorship for Oral Medical Technology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. 3. Department of Orthodontics, University of Bonn, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111, Bonn, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Valid measurement systems recording tooth mobility upon displacement within the subtle range of physiological strains are missing. Here, we introduce a novel in vivo measurement device and demonstrate a first clinical application by monitoring tooth mobility changes during retention after fixed multibracket appliance therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tooth mobility was measured in vivo on 21 patients (11 female, 10 male; mean age 16.1 ± 3.1 years) by displacing the upper first incisor 0.2 mm lingually for 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, and 10 s with the novel intraoral device. Measurements were recorded directly after, as much as 2, 7, and 14 days and up to 6 months after appliance debonding. RESULTS: Device performance was precise and valid in clinical use. Data revealed significant interindividual varying tooth mobility, which was very high during the first 2 days after appliance removal. After 1 week, mobility values decreased, but were generally higher upon short loadings compared to long ones. After 3 months, tooth mobility was significantly lower than directly after debonding. Interestingly, males exhibited significantly less mobility than females. CONCLUSIONS: Our work is the first using an in vivo measurement device capable of performing and recording tooth displacements within this delicate range and in such precision. Furthermore, our findings elucidate tooth mobility changes after multibracket treatment, giving important information for retention periods. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Establishment of this novel measurement device in clinical use is an important improvement when approaching the complexity of tooth mobility in vivo regarding different issues like orthodontics, periodontal disease, or bruxism.
OBJECTIVE: Valid measurement systems recording tooth mobility upon displacement within the subtle range of physiological strains are missing. Here, we introduce a novel in vivo measurement device and demonstrate a first clinical application by monitoring tooth mobility changes during retention after fixed multibracket appliance therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tooth mobility was measured in vivo on 21 patients (11 female, 10 male; mean age 16.1 ± 3.1 years) by displacing the upper first incisor 0.2 mm lingually for 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, and 10 s with the novel intraoral device. Measurements were recorded directly after, as much as 2, 7, and 14 days and up to 6 months after appliance debonding. RESULTS: Device performance was precise and valid in clinical use. Data revealed significant interindividual varying tooth mobility, which was very high during the first 2 days after appliance removal. After 1 week, mobility values decreased, but were generally higher upon short loadings compared to long ones. After 3 months, tooth mobility was significantly lower than directly after debonding. Interestingly, males exhibited significantly less mobility than females. CONCLUSIONS: Our work is the first using an in vivo measurement device capable of performing and recording tooth displacements within this delicate range and in such precision. Furthermore, our findings elucidate tooth mobility changes after multibracket treatment, giving important information for retention periods. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Establishment of this novel measurement device in clinical use is an important improvement when approaching the complexity of tooth mobility in vivo regarding different issues like orthodontics, periodontal disease, or bruxism.
Authors: L Keilig; M Drolshagen; K L Tran; I Hasan; S Reimann; J Deschner; K T Brinkmann; R Krause; M Favino; C Bourauel Journal: Ann Anat Date: 2015-09-12 Impact factor: 2.698
Authors: Martin Hartmann; Cornelius Dirk; Susanne Reimann; Ludger Keilig; Anna Konermann; Andreas Jäger; Christoph Bourauel Journal: J Orofac Orthop Date: 2017-01-13 Impact factor: 1.938