Literature DB >> 27324385

Predictors of inguinodynia, recurrence, and metachronous hernias after inguinal herniorrhaphy in veteran patients.

Sergio Huerta1, Prachi M Patel2, Ali A Mokdad3, Jonathan Chang4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present single-institution, single-surgeon experience interrogated morbidity as well as predictors of inguinodynia, recurrence, and metachronous hernias in 953 consecutive inguinal herniorrhaphies between 2005 and 2015.
METHODS: Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed from patient medical records at the VA North Texas Health Care System.
RESULTS: Ninety-nine percent of our patients were male, 73% Caucasian, 60.4 ± 1.4 years old, body mass index = 26.7 ± 4.2 kg/m(2). Overall morbidity was 11.9%. The most common complication was urinary retention (2.3%). Inguinodynia and recurrence occurred at a rate of 1.5% and .8%, respectively. If a patient had a hernia repair, he had a 12% chance of needing a contralateral repair within 7.6 years. Younger age (odds ratio [OR], .96; 95% confidence interval [CI], .91 to 1.0), current history of smoking (OR, 5.3; 95% CI, 1.3 to 22.3), and a previous contralateral hernia repair (OR, 5.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 25.0) were independent predictors of inguinodynia. A direct hernia was associated with recurrence (45% vs 100%; P = .02). Current smoking was an independent predictor of recurrence (OR, 5.4; 95% CI 1.0 to 29.3). Age (55- to 75-year old; OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.9), age (>75-year old; OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.1 to 6.1), an indirect hernia repair (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2 to 3.1), a pantaloon hernia repair (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0 to 3.8), and current consumption of alcohol (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.5) were independent predictors of a metachronous hernia.
CONCLUSIONS: The following study presents several factors predictive of outcomes in patients with inguinal hernias that might be useful in preventing complications and providing informed consent to this patient population. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bassini; Chronic inguinal pain; Femoral hernia; Lichtenstein; Mesh; Urinary retention

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27324385     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.01.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  7 in total

1.  Comment to: Should we perform elective inguinal hernia repair in the elderly? Wu J. J. et al.

Authors:  V Jain; M Sultany; S Huerta
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Surgical trends of groin hernia repairs performed for recurrence in medicare patients.

Authors:  B L Murphy; J Zhang; D S Ubl; E B Habermann; D R Farley; K Paley
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair is not superior to open.

Authors:  S Huerta
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Factors predicting chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair: a regression analysis of randomized trial comparing three different meshes with three fixation methods (FinnMesh Study).

Authors:  M Matikainen; E Aro; J Vironen; J Kössi; T Hulmi; S Silvasti; I Ilves; M Hertsi; K Mustonen; H Paajanen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  A case report of a de Garengeot hernia in a nonagenarian veteran.

Authors:  Luis R Taveras; Sergio Huerta
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2017-11-03

Review 6.  Risk factors for perioperative complications in inguinal hernia repair - a systematic review.

Authors:  Dirk Weyhe; Navid Tabriz; Bianca Sahlmann; Verena-Nicole Uslar
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2017-02-25

7.  A case report of a groin pseudocyst following inguinal hernia repair and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Juan Favela; Sergio Huerta
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2018-07-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.