Literature DB >> 27323394

Mutation spectrum of TP53 gene predicts clinicopathological features and survival of gastric cancer.

Tomomitsu Tahara1, Tomoyuki Shibata1, Yasuyuki Okamoto2, Jumpei Yamazaki3, Tomohiko Kawamura1, Noriyuki Horiguchi1, Masaaki Okubo1, Naoko Nakano1, Takamitsu Ishizuka1, Mitsuo Nagasaka1, Yoshihito Nakagawa1, Naoki Ohmiya1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: TP53 gene is frequently mutated in gastric cancer (GC), but the relationship with clinicopathological features and prognosis is conflicting. Here, we screened TP53 mutation spectrum of 214 GC patients in relation to their clinicopathological features and prognosis.
RESULTS: TP53 nonsilent mutations were detected in 80 cases (37.4%), being frequently occurred as C:G to T:A single nucleotide transitions at 5'-CpG-3' sites. TP53 mutations occurred more frequently in differentiated histologic type than in undifferentiated type in the early stage (48.6% vs. 7%, P=0.0006), while the mutations correlated with venous invasion among advanced stage (47.7% vs. 20.7%, P=0.04). Subset of GC with TP53 hot spot mutations (R175, G245, R248, R273, R282) presented significantly worse overall survival and recurrence free survival compared to others (both P=0.001).
METHODS: Matched biopsies from GC and adjacent tissues from 214 patients were used for the experiment. All coding regions of TP53 gene (exon2 to exon11) were examined using Sanger sequencing.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that GC with TP53 mutations seems to develop as differentiated histologic type and show aggressive biological behavior such as venous invasion. Moreover, our data emphasizes the importance of discriminating TP53 hot spot mutations (R175, G245, R248, R273, R282) to predict worse overall survival and recurrence free survival of GC patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TP53 mutation; gastric cancer; hotspot mutations; spectrum; survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27323394      PMCID: PMC5173132          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


INTRODUCTION

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide, accounted for approximately 70,000 new cases and 650,000 deaths per year [1, 2]. Despite advances in diagnosis technologies, many patients still have advanced disease at diagnosis and treatment outcomes for such patients are poor [3]. Moreover, GC is heterogeneous in its clinical course and prognosis. However, underlying mechanisms to address this issue has not been fully understood. Concerning the molecular abnormality in GC, several genetic changes in gastric carcinogenesis have been elucidated including oncogenes (KRAS, b-catenin, ERBB2, PIK3CA etc.) [4-7] and tumor-suppressor genes (CDH1, p16, TP53, ARID1A etc.) [8-11]. TP53 is the most studied gene in many cancers and may be possible candidate biomarker for GC. The gene encoding TP53 is located on chromosome 17p and consists of 11 exons and 10 introns. TP53 protein has important cellular functions, including in cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, and DNA repair [12, 13]. Even by advances in new technologies, such as whole exome sequencing, TP53 is confirmed as the most frequently mutated gene in human cancers, with alterations occurring in about half of human cancers [8-11]. Concerning the association between TP53 status and subtypes and prognosis of GC, conflicting results did not conclude the clinical significance of TP53 as a molecular marker [14-17]. We reasoned that conflicting result may be partly due to the limitation of immunohistochemistry assay that may not detect truncating type mutations (frameshift and nonsense mutations) [14], or a lack of discriminations of different types of mutation occurring throughout the coding exons. To resolve these issues, we investigated TP53 mutation spectrum throughout the entire exons in 214 GC cases. We aimed to clarify the association between clinicopathological features and prognosis of GC and TP53 mutation status with an attempt to their change types.

RESULTS

Spectrum of TP53 mutations

We performed Sanger sequencing of TP53 genes in 214 GC tissues and matched normal tissues Representative sequencing chromatograms are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Representative sequencing chromatograms of two cases with TP53 mutations

Below indicates the position at chromosome. Position at codon was indicated in the parentheses (left).

Representative sequencing chromatograms of two cases with TP53 mutations

Below indicates the position at chromosome. Position at codon was indicated in the parentheses (left). We found 80 cases (37.4%) with TP53 nonsilent mutations. One tumor had 3 mutations, 3 had 2 mutations, and 76 had a single mutation, for a total of 85 mutations in this cohort. Mostly, these mutations were predicted to either truncate the protein through base substitutions, resulting in a stop codon (nonsense, 13 mutations) or a frame shift (16 mutations), multiple nucleotide polymorphism (1 mutation) or to damage the protein as predicted by SIFT analysis (52 out of 55 missense mutations) (Figure 2, Supplementary Table 2). These mutations were distributed across exon4 to exon10, but majority were in the DNA binding domain of central core region (Figure 3). Concerning the spectrum and nucleotide contexts of the substitution mutations, most frequent alterations were C:G to T:A transitions (54.4%), predominantly occurred at 5′-CpG-3′dinucleotide sites (47.1%, Table 1).
Figure 2

Summary of TP53 mutations in 214 GC cases

F/S, frame shift; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; MNP multiple nucleotide polymorphism;

Figure 3

Mutation spectrum of TP53 in 214 GC cases

Individual exons are represented as numbered boxes. TAD, Trans activation domain; RRR, Proline-rich region; NLS, nuclear localization signal sequence; OD, Tetramerization domain; NES, nuclear export signal sequence; RD, Regulatory domain;

Table 1

Spectrum of TP53 single base substitutions

Variablesn (%)
Total number of substitutions68
Substitutions at C:G base pairs
C:G → T:A37 (54.4)
C:G → G:C3 (4.4)
C:G → A:T8 (11.7)
Substitutions at T:A base pairs
T:A → C:G9 (13.2)
T:A → G:C3 (4.4)
T:A → A:T6 (8.8)
Substitutions at specific dinucleotides$
5′-CpG-3′32 (47.1)
5′-TpC-3′12 (17.6)

Base substitutions in coding sequences resulting in nonsynonymous changes are included (see Figure 2).

Includes substitutions at the C or G of the 5′-CpG-3′ dinucleotide, the C of the 5′-TpC-3′ dinucleotide, or the G of the 5′-GpA-3′ dinucleotide.

Summary of TP53 mutations in 214 GC cases

F/S, frame shift; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; MNP multiple nucleotide polymorphism;

Mutation spectrum of TP53 in 214 GC cases

Individual exons are represented as numbered boxes. TAD, Trans activation domain; RRR, Proline-rich region; NLS, nuclear localization signal sequence; OD, Tetramerization domain; NES, nuclear export signal sequence; RD, Regulatory domain; Base substitutions in coding sequences resulting in nonsynonymous changes are included (see Figure 2). Includes substitutions at the C or G of the 5′-CpG-3′ dinucleotide, the C of the 5′-TpC-3′ dinucleotide, or the G of the 5′-GpA-3′ dinucleotide.

Association between TP53 mutations and clinicopathological subtypes of GC

We investigated whether TP53 mutation positivity is associated with any clinicopathological subtypes of GC. Age, gender, location, H. pylori status, staging, histology, venous and lymphatic invasion, lymph node, liver, peritoneal and other distant metastasis were included for this analysis. Although we did not find any association between TP53 mutation positivity and age, gender, location, H. pylori status and staging (Table 2), TP53 mutation was more frequent in differentiated histologic type, compared to undifferentiated type (44.0% vs. 26.9%, P=0.01). Notably, this association was more striking among early stage GC (T1, 48.6% vs. 7%, P=0.0006) but not in advanced stage (T2<, 35.0% vs. 36.4%, P>0.1) (Table 3). We also found that in advanced stage GC (T2<), TP53 mutation was more frequent in cases having venous invasion (47.7% vs. 20.7%, P=0.04). A similar trend was also found in cases having more severe lymph node metastasis (N0~1 vs. N2~, 31.3% vs. 47.1%, P<0.1) (Table 4).
Table 2

TP53 mutation status and subtypes of GC

Variables n (%)TP53 wild typeTP53 mutated
Age (mean +/− SEM)64.4+/−1.066.4+/−1.4
Gender
Female n (%)46 (67.6)22 (32.4)
Male n (%)88 (60.3)58 (39.7)
Location
Cardia n (%)7 (70.0)3 (30.0)
Upper n (%)19 (65.5)10 (34.5)
Middle n (%)70 (64.8)38 (35.2)
Lower n (%)38 (56.7)29 (43.3)
H. pylori status
Negative n (%)19 (65.5)10 (34.5)
Positive n (%)115 (62.2)70 (37.8)
Stage
I n (%)70 (66.0)36 (34.0)
II n (%)20 (64.5)11 (35.5)
III n (%)21 (58.3)15 (41.7)
IV n (%)22 (55.0)18 (45.0)
Depth
T1 n (%)62 (63.3)36 (36.7)
T2 n (%)16 (66.7)8 (33.3)
T3 n (%)8 (80.0)2 (20.0)
T4 n (%)48 (58.5)34 (41.5)

Stage was determined for 213 cases

Table 3

TP53 mutation status and histologic subtypes of GC

Variables n (%)TP53 wild typeTP53 mutated
Total number of patients134 (62.6)80 (37.4)
All subjects (n=214)#
Differentiated n (%)61 (56.0)48 (44.0)
Un differentiated n (%)68 (73.1)25 (26.9)
Mixed n (%)5 (41.7)7 (58.3)
Early stage (T1, n=98)$
Differentiated n (%)35 (51.5)33 (48.5)
Un differentiated n (%)26 (92.9)2 (7.1)
Mixed n (%)1 (50.0)1 (50.0)
Advanced stage (T2~4, n=116)
Differentiated n (%)26 (65.0)14 (35.0)
Un differentiated n (%)42 (63.6)24 (36.4)
Mixed n (%)4 (40.0)6 (60.0)

P=0.01;

P=0.0006;

Table 4

TP53 mutation status and lymphatic and venal invasion, and metastasis in advanced GC

TP53 wild typeTP53 mutated
Lymphatic invasion
Negative4 (80.0)1 (20.0)
Positive42 (61.8)26 (38.2)
Venous invasion#
Negative23 (79.3)6 (20.7)
Positive23 (52.3)21 (47.7)
Lymphnode metastasis$
N0~144 (68.8)20 (31.3)
N2~27 (52.9)24 (47.1)
Peritoneal dissemination
Negative56 (65.9)29 (34.1)
Positive15 (50.0)15 (50.0)
Liver metastasis
Negative66 (61.1)42 (38.9)
Positive5 (71.4)2 (28.6)
Other distant metastasis
Negative66 (61.7)41 (38.3)
Positive5 (62.5)3 (37.5)

Lymphatic and venous invasion was determined for 73 cases

Metastasis was determined for 115 cases

P=0.04;

P<0.10;

Stage was determined for 213 cases P=0.01; P=0.0006; Lymphatic and venous invasion was determined for 73 cases Metastasis was determined for 115 cases P=0.04; P<0.10;

Association between TP53 hot spot mutations and clinicopathological subtypes of GC

Next we aimed to investigate whether TP53 mutation is associated with survival and relapse of GC patients. 210 cases were evaluated for this analysis. We did not find any significant association between overall survival and recurrence free survival among cases with or without TP53 mutation (data not shown). However, focusing on TP53 mutation hot spots within the central core (R175, G245, R248, R273, R282), which is reported to be mutated across various cancers. We found that the cases having mutation in this hot spots (6.2%, n=13) presented significantly worse overall survival and recurrence free survival compared to others (both P values =0.001, Figure 4). To confirm this result, we next conducted multivariate survival analysis using Cox's regression model to see whether the TP53 hotspot mutations would be associated with worse overall survival as an independent factor. Age, gender, histology, depth, lymph node metastasis, peritoneal dissemination, liver or other distant metastasis, staging and TP53 hotspot mutations were included for this analysis. The result demonstrated that TP53 hotspot mutations was associated with worse overall survival as an independent factor (hazard ratio=3.57, 95% confidence interval= 1.44-8.86, P=0.006, Table 5).
Figure 4

Association between TP53 mutation and overall survival (left) and recurrence free survival (right) in GC patients

Statistical analysis was performed by the Log rank test.

Table 5

Multivariate survival analysis using Cox's regression model for adjustment of clinicopathological factors TP53 hotspot mutations

VariablesHR (95%CI)P
Age1.02 (1.00-1.05)0.05
Gender (male)1.74 (0.88-3.16)0.11
H. pylori positive0.81 (0.32-2.08)0.66
Location (cardia)3.61 (1.22-10.65)0.02
Histology (un differentiated type)1.11 (0.57-2.17)0.11
Depth2.12 (1.08-4.13)0.03
Lymph node metastasis1.69 (0.72-3.95)0.23
Peritoneal dissemination2.86 (0.81-10.1)0.1
Liver metastasis1.92 (0.36-10.37)0.45
Other distant metastasis1.45 (0.45-4.65)0.53
Staging1.77 (0.64-4.84)0.27
TP53 hotspot mutations3.57 (1.44-8.86)0.006

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval;

Association between TP53 mutation and overall survival (left) and recurrence free survival (right) in GC patients

Statistical analysis was performed by the Log rank test. HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; We also tried to investigate the association between TP53 hotspot mutations and recurrences of GC including liver, peritoneal, lymph node and others. In advanced GC (T2<), this analysis showed that the cases that have TP53 hotspot mutations presented significantly higher liver or other recurrences compared to others (P<0.05, 0.02, respectively) (Table 6).
Table 6

Association between TP53 mutation in hot spots and recurrence in advanced GC

VariablesTP53 hot spot mutationsOthers
(n=11)(n=105)
Over all recurrences n (%)7 (63.6)47 (44.7)
Liver recurrences n (%)#3 (27.3)8 (7.6)
Peritoneal recurrences n (%)3 (27.3)32 (30.5)
Lymph node recurrences n (%)1 (9.1)6 (5.7)
Other recurrences n (%)$3 (27.3)6 (5.7)

P<0.05;

P=0.02;

P<0.05; P=0.02; We also evaluated whether the change types (nonsense, missense or frame shift), nucleotide contexts of the substitution mutations, and locations (exons, 5′-CpG-3′ sites 5′-TpC-3′) of TP53 mutations would be associated with prognosis of GC. But association were all negative except for the mutations in the hot spots (data not shown).

DISCUSSION

Regarding the spectrum of TP53 mutations in our study, C:G to T:A transitions were predominantly occurred at 5′-CpG-3′dinucleotide sites, which was in line with other study in GC [8, 10, 14]. Not only the TP53 gene, C:G to T:A transitions are known to be most frequent transitions throughout the genomes in GC [8, 10]. C to T transition is induced by nitric oxide [19, 20], a substance known to be induced by H. pylori infections. C:G to T:A transitions are also specifically induced by N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoquanidine and N-nitroso compounds found in foods, substances considered to be carcinogens in GC [21]. These foods are commonly consumed in high risk populations for developing GC including Japanese. Our result confirmed that C:G to T:A transitions are typical mutation spectrum of TP53 in GC, reflecting interaction between H. pylori infection and environmental predisposing factors. There are conflicting results with respect to the prevalence of TP53 mutations as well as their relationship to clinicopathological features in GC [14], which may be partly due to difference of patient constitutions or the method for detection of mutations. Immunohistochemistry assay used in many studies lacks the ability to detect truncating type mutations (frameshift and nonsense mutations). Single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis also misses considerable percentage of mutations [14]. In this study, all coding exons of TP53 gene were screened by the Sanger sequencing. TP53 mutation frequency in our dataset was 37.4%, which was quite similar to that of recent Japanese study using the Digital PCR targeted sequencing coupled with macrodissection [11]. Other strength of our study was to use endoscopic biopsy specimens. Since the mutation detection rate seemed to be reliable even by using tiny biopsy samples, our data suggests the potential usefulness of endoscopic biopsy for the molecular analysis especially in patients with advanced stage who have no information from surgically resected specimens. Among several clinicopathological features, TP53 mutation was more frequent in differentiated histologic type, which is in line with some previous reports [22, 23]. Of note, the correlation was striking among early stage, not observed in advanced stage. The data suggests that majority of TP53 mutated GC are differentiated histologic type in the early stage. It has been reported that progression of differentiated type GC often results in histological change to undifferentiated type [24]. It is therefore possible that considerable portion of TP53 mutated undifferentiated GCs may have originally developed as differentiated type. We also found that TP53 mutation was correlated with venous invasion in advanced GC. A similar trend was also found for more severe lymph node metastasis. This indicates mutation status reflects different biological behavior of GC. TP53 mutation has also been associated with more aggressive phenotypes of other tumor types, such as esophageal and colorectal cancers [25, 26]. Since GC with venous invasion and severe lymph node metastasis often show more aggressive biological behaviors including relapsing even after curative surgery, TP53 mutated GC may need more intensive adjuvant chemotherapy or frequent follow up to prevent relapsing after gastrectomy. We have also shown that subset of GCs with specific TP53 mutations (hot spots within the central core: R175, G245, R248, R273, R282) is associated with worse overall survival and recurrence free survival. The worse prognosis of these mutations was also confirmed as an independent factor using the multivariate survival analysis. The same mutation type was also associated with recurrences of GC. This result emphasizes the importance of discriminating TP53 mutations to divide GC patients for better clinical implementation reflecting biological behavior. Our data suggest that hotspot TP53 mutated GC may need more intensive therapy or careful follow up even after curative resection. Importance of discriminating TP53 change types is also reported in colorectal cancer patients with poor prognosis who have mutations in R175 and G245. Although the prevalence of these mutations are not so high in all GC in our dataset (13/214, 6.2%). Significant worse prognosis of these patients suggests the potential usefulness of these mutations as a molecular marker in GC patients. Since the relationship between TP53 status and response to chemotherapy in GC patients has been conflicting [15-17], whether these mutations can predict response to chemotherapy needs to be evaluated in the larger cohort. We analyzed TP53 mutations in GC tissue, obtained by endoscopic biopsy. It should be noted that the results may not reflect the characteristics of whole part of the tumor considering the tumor heterogeneity. Still, our result showing the association between TP53 hotspot mutations and prognosis of GC would provide considerable information especially in patients who cannot undergo surgery due to the advance diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study population

We enrolled 214 patients with gastric cancer (GC) treated in our hospital from September 2004 to February 2008. These patients consisted of 146 male and 68 females. Median age at diagnosis was 66 years (ranged from 29 to 94 years). All GC was diagnosed histologically. Detailed information about histologic subtypes, anatomic location, macroscopic types, lymph node and other metastasis and peritoneal dissemination was also obtained according to the Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma [18]. Information about treatment of GC was available for 210 patients. 172 patients performed gastrectomy with consideration of surgical indication, while 36 patients were diagnosed as non-resectable and were received chemotherapy. Two patients received best supportive care due to advanced diseases without indication of any curative treatment. Overall survival, defined as the time from gastrectomy, or start of initial administration of chemotherapy to the date of cancer related death was determined for 210 patients. Recurrence free survival, defined as the time from gastrectomy, or start of initial administration of chemotherapy to the date of tumor progression or cancer related death was also determined in the same cases. Patients with no confirmation of progression or cancer related death were censored at the date of the last objective tumor assessment. The Ethics Committee of Fujita Health University School of Medicine approved the protocol and written informed consent was obtained from all of the subjects.

Sample collection, assessment of H. pylori infection

During endoscopy, biopsy specimens were taken from primary GCs and adjacent normal-appearing mucosa. The specimens were immediately frozen and stored at −80°C until use. Genomic DNA was extracted directly from these frozen specimens using the standard protein precipitation method. All DNA samples were obtained before gastrectomy or chemotherapy. Through histological examination of biopsy specimens taken almost same area of the tumor tissue, we confirmed that all biopsies from cancerous tissue contained more than 70% of cancer cells. H. pylori infection status was assessed by histological analysis of both the biopsy specimens from the greater curvature of the gastric antrum and upper corpus using antibodies.

Sanger sequencing

All coding regions of TP53 gene (exon2 to exon11) from GC tissues and matched normal gastric tissues were amplified using PCR reactions. These PCR fragments were sequenced using Sanger Sequencing. PCR and sequence primers are listed in Supplementary Table 1. The sequence chromatograms were visually inspected with DNA Dynamo Sequence Analysis Software (Blue Tractor Software, Llanfair-fachan, Wales, UK). All mutations were confirmed by independent PCR and sequencing reactions. We only consider the nucleotide variation as the mutations, shown in the tumor samples, not in the normal tissues. For non-silent single nucleotide substitutions, SIFT (sorting intolerant from tolerant) analysis was performed to predict whether an amino acid substitution affects protein function.

Statistics

The statistical significance of the differential frequency of TP53 mutations in two groups was determined using two-tailed Fisher's exact test. Overall survival and recurrence free survival, in relation to the TP53 mutations was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Log rank test. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
  24 in total

1.  The prognostic significance of amplification and overexpression of c-met and c-erb B-2 in human gastric carcinomas.

Authors:  M Nakajima; H Sawada; Y Yamada; A Watanabe; M Tatsumi; J Yamashita; M Matsuda; T Sakaguchi; T Hirao; H Nakano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Blinded by the Light: The Growing Complexity of p53.

Authors:  Karen H Vousden; Carol Prives
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Microsatellite instability and p53 mutations in sporadic right and left colon carcinoma: different clinical and molecular implications.

Authors:  M E Lleonart; J García-Foncillas; R Sánchez-Prieto; P Martín; A Moreno; C Salas; S Ramón y Cajal
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Exome sequencing of gastric adenocarcinoma identifies recurrent somatic mutations in cell adhesion and chromatin remodeling genes.

Authors:  Zhi Jiang Zang; Ioana Cutcutache; Song Ling Poon; Shen Li Zhang; John R McPherson; Jiong Tao; Vikneswari Rajasegaran; Hong Lee Heng; Niantao Deng; Anna Gan; Kiat Hon Lim; Choon Kiat Ong; DaChuan Huang; Sze Yung Chin; Iain Beehuat Tan; Cedric Chuan Young Ng; Willie Yu; Yingting Wu; Minghui Lee; Jeanie Wu; Dianne Poh; Wei Keat Wan; Sun Young Rha; Jimmy So; Manuel Salto-Tellez; Khay Guan Yeoh; Wai Keong Wong; Yi-Jun Zhu; P Andrew Futreal; Brendan Pang; Yijun Ruan; Axel M Hillmer; Denis Bertrand; Niranjan Nagarajan; Steve Rozen; Bin Tean Teh; Patrick Tan
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Increased incidence of undifferentiated type of gastric cancer with tumor progression in 912 patients with early gastric cancer and 1245 with advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Y Ikeda; M Mori; T Kamakura; Y Haraguchi; M Saku; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  DNA deaminating ability and genotoxicity of nitric oxide and its progenitors.

Authors:  D A Wink; K S Kasprzak; C M Maragos; R K Elespuru; M Misra; T M Dunams; T A Cebula; W H Koch; A W Andrews; J S Allen
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-11-15       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Chromosomal instability rather than p53 mutation is associated with response to neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Katja Ott; Holger Vogelsang; James Mueller; Karen Becker; Martina Müller; Ulrich Fink; Jörg Rüdiger Siewert; Heinz Höfler; Gisela Keller
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Mutations of PIK3CA in gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Vivian Sze Wing Li; Chi Wai Wong; Tsun Leung Chan; Agnes Sze Wah Chan; Wei Zhao; Kent-Man Chu; Samuel So; Xin Chen; Siu Tsan Yuen; Suet Yi Leung
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  16 in total

1.  Effect of annexin A7 suppression on the apoptosis of gastric cancer cells.

Authors:  Weihua Ye; Yong Li; Liqiao Fan; Qun Zhao; Hufang Yuan; Bibo Tan; Zhidong Zhang
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.396

2.  SOCS3 gene silencing does not occur through methylation and mutations in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Atika Al Saqri; Shika Hanif Malgundkar; Fatima Al Kindi; Ishita Gupta; Mansour Al Moundhri; Yahya Tamimi
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 4.174

3.  Circulating Antibodies against Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) and p53 in EBV-Positive and -Negative Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  M Constanza Camargo; Kyoung-Mee Kim; Keitaro Matsuo; Javier Torres; Linda M Liao; Douglas Morgan; Angelika Michel; Tim Waterboer; Minkyo Song; Margaret L Gulley; Ricardo L Dominguez; Yasushi Yatabe; Sung Kim; Gustavo Cortes-Martinez; Jolanta Lissowska; Jovanny Zabaleta; Michael Pawlita; Charles S Rabkin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Different effects of p53 protein overexpression on the survival of gastric cancer patients according to Lauren histologic classification: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ki Wook Kim; Nayoung Kim; Yonghoon Choi; Won Seok Kim; Hyuk Yoon; Cheol Min Shin; Young Soo Park; Dong Ho Lee; Young Suk Park; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Do Joong Park; Hyung-Ho Kim; Hye Seung Lee; Ji-Won Kim; Jin Won Kim; Keun-Wook Lee; Won Chang; Ji Hoon Park; Yoon Jin Lee; Kyoung Ho Lee; Young Hoon Kim
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Clinical Significance of p53 Protein Expression, Beta-catenin Expression and HER2 Expression for Epstein-Barr Virus-associated Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Dong Won Baek; Byung Woog Kang; Soyoon Hwang; Jong Gwang Kim; An Na Seo; Han Ik Bae; Oh Kyoung Kwon; Seung Soo Lee; Ho Young Chung; Wansik Yu
Journal:  Chonnam Med J       Date:  2017-05-25

6.  Prediction of TP53 mutations by p53 immunohistochemistry and their prognostic significance in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hye Jung Hwang; Soo Kyung Nam; Hyunjin Park; Yujun Park; Jiwon Koh; Hee Young Na; Yoonjin Kwak; Woo Ho Kim; Hye Seung Lee
Journal:  J Pathol Transl Med       Date:  2020-07-01

7.  High Proportion of Potential Candidates for Immunotherapy in a Chilean Cohort of Gastric Cancer Patients: Results of the FORCE1 Study.

Authors:  Miguel Cordova-Delgado; Mauricio P Pinto; Ignacio N Retamal; Matías Muñoz-Medel; María Loreto Bravo; María F Fernández; Betzabé Cisternas; Sebastián Mondaca; César Sanchez; Hector Galindo; Bruno Nervi; Carolina Ibáñez; Francisco Acevedo; Jorge Madrid; José Peña; Erica Koch; Maria José Maturana; Diego Romero; Nathaly de la Jara; Javiera Torres; Manuel Espinoza; Carlos Balmaceda; Yuwei Liao; Zhiguang Li; Matías Freire; Valentina Gárate-Calderón; Javier Cáceres; Gonzalo Sepúlveda-Hermosilla; Rodrigo Lizana; Liliana Ramos; Rocío Artigas; Enrique Norero; Fernando Crovari; Ricardo Armisén; Alejandro H Corvalán; Gareth I Owen; Marcelo Garrido
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 8.  Metabolic reprogramming results in abnormal glycolysis in gastric cancer: a review.

Authors:  Yuanda Liu; Ze Zhang; Junyang Wang; Chao Chen; Xiaohuan Tang; Jiaming Zhu; Jingjing Liu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Establishment of a Prognostic Model for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Related Gene Analysis.

Authors:  Peng Liu; Jinhong Wei; Feiyu Mao; Zechang Xin; Heng Duan; Yan Du; Xiaodong Wang; Zhennan Li; Jianjun Qian; Jie Yao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Landscape of somatic mutations in gastric cancer assessed using next-generation sequencing analysis.

Authors:  Xuan Pan; Xiaozhi Ji; Renmin Zhang; Zhaofei Zhou; Yuejiao Zhong; Wei Peng; Ning Sun; Xinyu Xu; Lei Xia; Pansong Li; Jianwei Lu; Jing Tu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.