Literature DB >> 27323383

Parallel Versus Distributed Data Access for Gigapixel-Resolution Histology Images: Challenges and Opportunities.

Esma Yildirim, David J Foran.   

Abstract

Recent advances in digital pathology technology have led to significant improvements in terms of both the quality and resolution of the resulting images, which now often exceed several gigabytes each. Today, several leading institutions across the country utilize whole-slide imaging (WSI) as part of their routine workflow. WSIs have utility in a wide range of diagnostic and investigative pathology applications. The fact that these images are both large in size (about 30 GB when uncompressed) and are generated in nonstandard proprietary formats has limited wider adoption of these technologies and makes the task of accessing, processing, and analyzing them in high-throughput fashion extremely challenging. The common approach for such data analytic applications is to preprocess the large whole-slide images into smaller size files and store them in a generic format. However, this approach limits the advantages that might be realized if different scalability levels and data unit sizes could be dynamically changed based on the specifications of the task at hand and the architectural limits of the infrastructure (e.g., node memory size). Such strategies also introduce extra processing time to the workflow. To address these challenges, we present, in this paper, novel scalable access methods for parallel file systems and distributed file/object storage systems. Experimental results gathered during the course of our studies show that these methods provide opportunities not realizable using traditional approaches. We demonstrate tangible, scalability, and high-throughput advantages using a Lustre parallel file system and AWS S3 distributed storage system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27323383      PMCID: PMC5154779          DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2016.2580145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform        ISSN: 2168-2194            Impact factor:   5.772


  7 in total

1.  A parallel solution for high resolution histological image analysis.

Authors:  G Bueno; R González; O Déniz; M García-Rojo; J González-García; M M Fernández-Carrobles; N Vállez; J Salido
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Weakly supervised histopathology cancer image segmentation and classification.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Jun-Yan Zhu; Eric I-Chao Chang; Maode Lai; Zhuowen Tu
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis.

Authors:  Caroline A Schneider; Wayne S Rasband; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 28.547

4.  Comparative Performance Analysis of Intel Xeon Phi, GPU, and CPU: A Case Study from Microscopy Image Analysis.

Authors:  George Teodoro; Tahsin Kurc; Jun Kong; Lee Cooper; Joel Saltz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.687

5.  Hadoop-GIS: A High Performance Spatial Data Warehousing System over MapReduce.

Authors:  Ablimit Aji; Fusheng Wang; Hoang Vo; Rubao Lee; Qiaoling Liu; Xiaodong Zhang; Joel Saltz
Journal:  Proceedings VLDB Endowment       Date:  2013-08

6.  Distributed computing in image analysis using open source frameworks and application to image sharpness assessment of histological whole slide images.

Authors:  Norman Zerbe; Peter Hufnagl; Karsten Schlüns
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.644

7.  Content-based histopathology image retrieval using CometCloud.

Authors:  Xin Qi; Daihou Wang; Ivan Rodero; Javier Diaz-Montes; Rebekah H Gensure; Fuyong Xing; Hua Zhong; Lauri Goodell; Manish Parashar; David J Foran; Lin Yang
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.