Monica C Serra1,2, Elizabeth Balraj2, Beth L DiSanzo2, Frederick M Ivey1,3, Charlene E Hafer-Macko4,3, Margarita S Treuth5, Alice S Ryan1,2. 1. a Research Service , Baltimore VA , Baltimore , MD , USA. 2. b Department of Medicine, Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine , University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA. 3. d Department of Neurology , University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA. 4. c GRECC , Baltimore VA , Baltimore , MD , USA. 5. e Department of Kinesiology , University of Maryland Eastern Shore , Princess Anne , MD , USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accelerometers can objectively measure steps taken per day in individuals without gait deficits, but accelerometers also have the ability to estimate frequency, intensity, and duration of physical activity. However, thresholds to distinguish varying levels of activity intensity using the Actical brand accelerometer are standardized only for the general population and may underestimate intensity in stroke. OBJECTIVE: To derive Actical activity count thresholds specific to stroke disability for use in more accurately gauging time spent at differing activity levels. METHODS: Men (n = 18) and women (n = 10) with chronic hemiparetic gait (4 ± 2 years latency, 43% Caucasian, 56% African-American, ages of 47-83 years, BMI 19-48 kg/m2) participated in the study. Actical accelerometers were placed on the non-paretic hip to obtain accelerometry counts during eight activities of varying intensity: (1) watching TV; (2) seated stretching; (3) standing stretching; (4) floor sweeping; (5) stepping in place; (6) over-ground walking; (7) lower speed treadmill walking (1.0 mph at 4% incline); and (8) higher speed treadmill walking (2.0 mph at 4% incline). Simultaneous portable monitoring (Cosmed K4b2) enabled quantification of energy cost for each activity in metabolic equivalents (METs, or oxygen consumption in multiples of resting level). Measurements were obtained for 10 min of standard rest and 5 min during each of the eight activities. RESULTS: Regression analysis yielded the following new stroke-specific Actical minimum thresholds: 125 counts per minute (cpm) for sedentary/light activity, 667 cpm for light/moderate activity, and 1546 cpm for moderate/vigorous activity. CONCLUSION: Our revised cut points better reflect activity levels after stroke and suggest significantly lower thresholds relative to those observed for the general population of healthy individuals. We conclude that the standard, commonly applied Actical thresholds are inappropriate for this unique population.
BACKGROUND: Accelerometers can objectively measure steps taken per day in individuals without gait deficits, but accelerometers also have the ability to estimate frequency, intensity, and duration of physical activity. However, thresholds to distinguish varying levels of activity intensity using the Actical brand accelerometer are standardized only for the general population and may underestimate intensity in stroke. OBJECTIVE: To derive Actical activity count thresholds specific to stroke disability for use in more accurately gauging time spent at differing activity levels. METHODS:Men (n = 18) and women (n = 10) with chronic hemiparetic gait (4 ± 2 years latency, 43% Caucasian, 56% African-American, ages of 47-83 years, BMI 19-48 kg/m2) participated in the study. Actical accelerometers were placed on the non-paretic hip to obtain accelerometry counts during eight activities of varying intensity: (1) watching TV; (2) seated stretching; (3) standing stretching; (4) floor sweeping; (5) stepping in place; (6) over-ground walking; (7) lower speed treadmill walking (1.0 mph at 4% incline); and (8) higher speed treadmill walking (2.0 mph at 4% incline). Simultaneous portable monitoring (Cosmed K4b2) enabled quantification of energy cost for each activity in metabolic equivalents (METs, or oxygen consumption in multiples of resting level). Measurements were obtained for 10 min of standard rest and 5 min during each of the eight activities. RESULTS: Regression analysis yielded the following new stroke-specific Actical minimum thresholds: 125 counts per minute (cpm) for sedentary/light activity, 667 cpm for light/moderate activity, and 1546 cpm for moderate/vigorous activity. CONCLUSION: Our revised cut points better reflect activity levels after stroke and suggest significantly lower thresholds relative to those observed for the general population of healthy individuals. We conclude that the standard, commonly applied Actical thresholds are inappropriate for this unique population.
Authors: Paul D Thompson; David Buchner; Ileana L Pina; Gary J Balady; Mark A Williams; Bess H Marcus; Kathy Berra; Steven N Blair; Fernando Costa; Barry Franklin; Gerald F Fletcher; Neil F Gordon; Russell R Pate; Beatriz L Rodriguez; Antronette K Yancey; Nanette K Wenger Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-06-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Elaina Haeuber; Marianne Shaughnessy; Larry W Forrester; Kim L Coleman; Richard F Macko Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Ershela L Sims; Francis J Keefe; Virginia B Kraus; Farshid Guilak; Robin M Queen; Daniel Schmitt Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Mary E Rosenberger; William L Haskell; Fahd Albinali; Selene Mota; Jason Nawyn; Stephen Intille Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Erica Twardzik; Philippa J Clarke; Lynda L Lisabeth; Susan H Brown; Steven P Hooker; Suzanne E Judd; Natalie Colabianchi Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2022-03-28 Impact factor: 6.604
Authors: Sophie Lawrie; Yun Dong; Dax Steins; Zhidao Xia; Patrick Esser; Shanbin Sun; Fei Li; James D Amor; Christopher James; Hooshang Izadi; Yi Cao; Derick Wade; Nancy Mayo; Helen Dawes Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2018-10-06
Authors: Scott J Strath; Taylor W Rowley; Chi C Cho; Allison Hyngstrom; Ann M Swartz; Kevin G Keenan; Julian Martinez; John W Staudenmayer Journal: J Meas Phys Behav Date: 2021-02-25
Authors: Nathaniel S Makowski; Rudi Kobetic; Kevin M Foglyano; Lisa M Lombardo; Stephen M Selkirk; Gilles Pinault; Ronald J Triolo Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Wouter J Harmsen; Gerard M Ribbers; Majanka H Heijenbrok-Kal; Johannes B J Bussmann; Emiel M Sneekes; Ladbon Khajeh; Fop van Kooten; Sebastian J C M M Neggers; Rita J van den Berg-Emons Journal: J Neuroeng Rehabil Date: 2017-11-23 Impact factor: 4.262