Literature DB >> 22032214

Long-term outcome poststroke: predictors of activity limitation and participation restriction.

Vered Gadidi1, Michal Katz-Leurer, Eli Carmeli, Natan M Bornstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe long-term activity limitation, participation restriction, and patients' overall perception of recovery among stroke patients 4 years poststroke, and to evaluate the association between the factors. In addition, the study investigated those factors present at the time of stroke onset, which could predict the level of activity limitation and participation restriction at 4 years poststroke.
DESIGN: Prospective, 4-year follow-up study.
SETTING: Subjects' homes, via telephone. PARTICIPANTS: All first ever stroke patients (N=139) admitted to the Sheba Medical Center in Israel between February and March 2004 were followed and reassessed for activity and participation restrictions.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Barthel index (BI) (activity limitation, BI<95) and Frenchay Activities Index (FAI) (participation restriction, FAI<30). Perception of recovery was assessed by 2 simple questions.
RESULTS: At 4 years poststroke, 9 patients (6.4%) were lost to follow-up, 71 (54.1%) patients had survived; 42.3% with activity limitation, 28.2% were classified as restricted in participation, and 78.1% felt they had not completely recovered. Age at stroke onset and disability in the acute phase were the most significant predictors of activity limitation at 4 years poststroke. None of the demographic characteristics or baseline clinical features predicted participation restriction. A positive association (ρ=0.6) was noted between activity limitation and participation restriction 4 years poststroke.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to describe long-term outcomes poststroke in Israel. Activity limitation and participation restriction remain highly prevalent up to 4 years after stroke. The potential influence of additional factors (psychosocial, cognitive, and environmental) as predictors of participation restriction should be topics for future investigation.
Copyright © 2011 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22032214     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  25 in total

1.  How does context influence arm use after stroke? A qualitative content analysis among rural community-dwelling stroke survivors.

Authors:  Vasanthan Rajagopalan; Manikandan Natarajan; Johnson Alex; John M Solomon
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Increased Energy Cost of Mobility in Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  Monica C Serra; Margarita S Treuth; Charlene E Hafer-Macko; Alice S Ryan
Journal:  J Gerontol Geriatr Res       Date:  2016-10-22

3.  Validating accelerometry as a measure of physical activity and energy expenditure in chronic stroke.

Authors:  Monica C Serra; Elizabeth Balraj; Beth L DiSanzo; Frederick M Ivey; Charlene E Hafer-Macko; Margarita S Treuth; Alice S Ryan
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 2.119

4.  The effect of motor relearning on balance, mobility and performance of activities of daily living among post-stroke patients: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Amer Ghrouz; Ester Marco; Elena Muñoz-Redondo; Roser Boza; Cindry Ramirez-Fuentes; Esther Duarte
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2022-02-11

5.  Automatic Identification of Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Exercise Type and Dose Using Body-Worn Sensors and Machine Learning: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Noah Balestra; Gaurav Sharma; Linda M Riek; Ania Busza
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2021-07-02

6.  Rhythmic arm cycling training improves walking and neurophysiological integrity in chronic stroke: the arms can give legs a helping hand in rehabilitation.

Authors:  Chelsea Kaupp; Gregory E P Pearcey; Taryn Klarner; Yao Sun; Hilary Cullen; Trevor S Barss; E Paul Zehr
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Gains Across WHO Dimensions of Function After Robot-Based Therapy in Stroke Subjects.

Authors:  Jennifer Wu; Lucy Dodakian; Jill See; Erin Burke Quinlan; Lisa Meng; Jeby Abraham; Ellen C Wong; Vu Le; Alison McKenzie; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Necessary and sufficient causes of participation post-stroke: practical and philosophical perspectives.

Authors:  Nancy E Mayo; David Bronstein; Susan C Scott; Lois E Finch; Sydney Miller
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Effect of Dextroamphetamine on Poststroke Motor Recovery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Larry B Goldstein; Laura Lennihan; Meheroz J Rabadi; David C Good; Michael J Reding; Alexander W Dromerick; Gregory P Samsa; John Pura
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 18.302

10.  The Effectiveness of Additional Core Stability Exercises in Improving Dynamic Sitting Balance, Gait and Functional Rehabilitation for Subacute Stroke Patients (CORE-Trial): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Rosa Cabanas-Valdés; Lídia Boix-Sala; Montserrat Grau-Pellicer; Juan Antonio Guzmán-Bernal; Fernanda Maria Caballero-Gómez; Gerard Urrútia
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.