Anahita Jalilvand1, Andrew Suzo1, Melissa Hornor1, Kristina Layton1, Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul1, Luke Macadam1, Dean Mikami1, Bradley Needleman1, Sabrena Noria2. 1. The Comprehensive Weight Management and Bariatric Surgery Program, Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio. 2. The Comprehensive Weight Management and Bariatric Surgery Program, Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio. Electronic address: Sabrena.Noria@osumc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is well established as an effective means of treating obesity; however, 30-day readmission rates remain high. The Bariatric Care Coaching Program was developed in response to a perceived need for better communication with patients upon discharge from hospital and prior to being seen at their first postoperative visit. The lack of communication was apparent from the number of patient phone calls to clinic and readmissions to hospital. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the care coaching program on hospital length of stay (LOS), readmission rates, patient phone calls, and patient satisfaction. SETTING: The study was conducted at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on patients who had primary bariatric surgery from July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2015. The control group included patients who underwent surgery from July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014, before development of the program, and the experimental group was composed of patients who received care coaching from July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2015. Demographics, postoperative complications, LOS, clinic phone calls, and hospital readmissions, prior to the first postoperative visit, were collected from medical records. Patient satisfaction scores were collected from the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey [HCAHPS]. Differences between study groups were assessed and P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were 261 and 264 patients in the care-coach and control groups, respectively. The care-coached group had fewer patients with intractable nausea/vomiting (P = .0164) and a shorter mean LOS (P = .032). Subgroup analysis indicated that the difference in LOS was evident for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (P = .002). There was no difference in readmission rates (P = .841) or phone calls to clinic (P = .407). HCAHPS scores demonstrated an improvement in patients' perception of communication regarding medications (59th versus 27th percentile), discharge information (98th versus 93rd percentile), and likelihood of recommending the hospital (85th versus 74th percentile). CONCLUSION: The Bariatric Care Coaching Program is an important new adjunct in the care of our bariatric inpatients. It has had the greatest impact on postoperative nausea/vomiting, LOS for sleeve gastrectomy, and patient satisfaction. Further studies are needed to evaluate how to use this program to reduce readmission rates and phone calls to the clinic.
BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is well established as an effective means of treating obesity; however, 30-day readmission rates remain high. The Bariatric Care Coaching Program was developed in response to a perceived need for better communication with patients upon discharge from hospital and prior to being seen at their first postoperative visit. The lack of communication was apparent from the number of patient phone calls to clinic and readmissions to hospital. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the care coaching program on hospital length of stay (LOS), readmission rates, patient phone calls, and patient satisfaction. SETTING: The study was conducted at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on patients who had primary bariatric surgery from July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2015. The control group included patients who underwent surgery from July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014, before development of the program, and the experimental group was composed of patients who received care coaching from July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2015. Demographics, postoperative complications, LOS, clinic phone calls, and hospital readmissions, prior to the first postoperative visit, were collected from medical records. Patient satisfaction scores were collected from the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey [HCAHPS]. Differences between study groups were assessed and P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: There were 261 and 264 patients in the care-coach and control groups, respectively. The care-coached group had fewer patients with intractable nausea/vomiting (P = .0164) and a shorter mean LOS (P = .032). Subgroup analysis indicated that the difference in LOS was evident for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (P = .002). There was no difference in readmission rates (P = .841) or phone calls to clinic (P = .407). HCAHPS scores demonstrated an improvement in patients' perception of communication regarding medications (59th versus 27th percentile), discharge information (98th versus 93rd percentile), and likelihood of recommending the hospital (85th versus 74th percentile). CONCLUSION: The Bariatric Care Coaching Program is an important new adjunct in the care of our bariatric inpatients. It has had the greatest impact on postoperative nausea/vomiting, LOS for sleeve gastrectomy, and patient satisfaction. Further studies are needed to evaluate how to use this program to reduce readmission rates and phone calls to the clinic.
Authors: John Saunders; Garth H Ballantyne; Scott Belsley; Daniel J Stephens; Amit Trivedi; Douglas R Ewing; Vincent A Iannace; Rafael F Capella; Annette Wasileweski; Steven Moran; Hans J Schmidt Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2008-05-02 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Christa R Abraham; Christopher R Werter; Ashar Ata; Yusef M Hazimeh; Ujas S Shah; Avinash Bhakta; Marcel Tafen; Paul T Singh; Todd D Beyer; Steven C Stain Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2015-02-28 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Alex W Lois; Matthew J Frelich; Natasha A Sahr; Samuel F Hohmann; Tao Wang; Jon C Gould Journal: Surgery Date: 2015-05-29 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Gregory C Wilson; R Cutler Quillin; Jeffrey M Sutton; Koffi Wima; Joshua J Shaw; Richard S Hoehn; Ian M Paquette; Daniel E Abbott; Shimul A Shah Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2014-07-27 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Jonathan Carter; Steven Elliott; Jennifer Kaplan; Matthew Lin; Andrew Posselt; Stanley Rogers Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Matthew T Baker; Michael D Lara; Christopher J Larson; Pamela J Lambert; Michelle A Mathiason; Shanu N Kothari Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2006 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Brian Hong; Edwin Stanley; Susan Reinhardt; Kristen Panther; Michael J Garren; Jon C Gould Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Steve Kwon; Bruce Wang; Edwin Wong; Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho; Sean D Sullivan; David R Flum Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2012-12-03 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Robert B Dorman; Christopher J Miller; Daniel B Leslie; Federico J Serrot; Bridget Slusarek; Henry Buchwald; John E Connett; Sayeed Ikramuddin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-03-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Dahlia M Kenawy; Lindsay M Breslin; J C Chen; Muna M Tamimi; Joann K North; Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul; Sabrena F Noria Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2022-09-27 Impact factor: 3.453
Authors: Regin Jay Mallari; Michael B Avery; Alex Corlin; Amalia Eisenberg; Terese C Hammond; Neil A Martin; Garni Barkhoudarian; Daniel F Kelly Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 3.240