Literature DB >> 27320222

Impact of care coaching on hospital length of stay, readmission rates, postdischarge phone calls, and patient satisfaction after bariatric surgery.

Anahita Jalilvand1, Andrew Suzo1, Melissa Hornor1, Kristina Layton1, Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul1, Luke Macadam1, Dean Mikami1, Bradley Needleman1, Sabrena Noria2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is well established as an effective means of treating obesity; however, 30-day readmission rates remain high. The Bariatric Care Coaching Program was developed in response to a perceived need for better communication with patients upon discharge from hospital and prior to being seen at their first postoperative visit. The lack of communication was apparent from the number of patient phone calls to clinic and readmissions to hospital.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the care coaching program on hospital length of stay (LOS), readmission rates, patient phone calls, and patient satisfaction.
SETTING: The study was conducted at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.
METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on patients who had primary bariatric surgery from July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2015. The control group included patients who underwent surgery from July 1, 2013 to June 30, 2014, before development of the program, and the experimental group was composed of patients who received care coaching from July 1, 2014 to June 30, 2015. Demographics, postoperative complications, LOS, clinic phone calls, and hospital readmissions, prior to the first postoperative visit, were collected from medical records. Patient satisfaction scores were collected from the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey [HCAHPS]. Differences between study groups were assessed and P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: There were 261 and 264 patients in the care-coach and control groups, respectively. The care-coached group had fewer patients with intractable nausea/vomiting (P = .0164) and a shorter mean LOS (P = .032). Subgroup analysis indicated that the difference in LOS was evident for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (P = .002). There was no difference in readmission rates (P = .841) or phone calls to clinic (P = .407). HCAHPS scores demonstrated an improvement in patients' perception of communication regarding medications (59th versus 27th percentile), discharge information (98th versus 93rd percentile), and likelihood of recommending the hospital (85th versus 74th percentile).
CONCLUSION: The Bariatric Care Coaching Program is an important new adjunct in the care of our bariatric inpatients. It has had the greatest impact on postoperative nausea/vomiting, LOS for sleeve gastrectomy, and patient satisfaction. Further studies are needed to evaluate how to use this program to reduce readmission rates and phone calls to the clinic.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27320222      PMCID: PMC4996747          DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.02.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  12 in total

1.  Use of laparoscopy in general surgical operations at academic centers.

Authors:  Ninh T Nguyen; Brian Nguyen; Anderson Shih; Brian Smith; Samuel Hohmann
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 4.734

2.  One-year readmission rates at a high volume bariatric surgery center: laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, laparoscopic gastric bypass, and vertical banded gastroplasty-Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  John Saunders; Garth H Ballantyne; Scott Belsley; Daniel J Stephens; Amit Trivedi; Douglas R Ewing; Vincent A Iannace; Rafael F Capella; Annette Wasileweski; Steven Moran; Hans J Schmidt
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Predictors of Hospital Readmission after Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Christa R Abraham; Christopher R Werter; Ashar Ata; Yusef M Hazimeh; Ujas S Shah; Avinash Bhakta; Marcel Tafen; Paul T Singh; Todd D Beyer; Steven C Stain
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  The relationship between duration of stay and readmissions in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Alex W Lois; Matthew J Frelich; Natasha A Sahr; Samuel F Hohmann; Tao Wang; Jon C Gould
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Factors related to readmission after major elective surgery.

Authors:  Gregory C Wilson; R Cutler Quillin; Jeffrey M Sutton; Koffi Wima; Joshua J Shaw; Richard S Hoehn; Ian M Paquette; Daniel E Abbott; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Predictors of hospital stay following laparoscopic gastric bypass: analysis of 9,593 patients from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Jonathan Carter; Steven Elliott; Jennifer Kaplan; Matthew Lin; Andrew Posselt; Stanley Rogers
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.734

7.  Length of stay and impact on readmission rates after laparoscopic gastric bypass.

Authors:  Matthew T Baker; Michael D Lara; Christopher J Larson; Pamela J Lambert; Michelle A Mathiason; Shanu N Kothari
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.734

8.  Factors associated with readmission after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery.

Authors:  Brian Hong; Edwin Stanley; Susan Reinhardt; Kristen Panther; Michael J Garren; Jon C Gould
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 4.734

9.  The impact of accreditation on safety and cost of bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Steve Kwon; Bruce Wang; Edwin Wong; Rafael Alfonso-Cristancho; Sean D Sullivan; David R Flum
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 4.734

10.  Risk for hospital readmission following bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Robert B Dorman; Christopher J Miller; Daniel B Leslie; Federico J Serrot; Bridget Slusarek; Henry Buchwald; John E Connett; Sayeed Ikramuddin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Patterns of hospital utilization after elective minimally invasive foregut surgery.

Authors:  Anahita D Jalilvand; Monet McNally; Patricia Belle; Kyle A Perry
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Current Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Valentina Bellini; Marina Valente; Melania Turetti; Paolo Del Rio; Francesco Saturno; Massimo Maffezzoni; Elena Bignami
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.479

3.  Baseline psychiatric diagnoses are associated with early readmissions and long hospital length of stay after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Anahita Jalilvand; Jane Dewire; Andrew Detty; Bradley Needleman; Sabrena Noria
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Impact of post-discharge phone calls on non-urgent hospital returns < 90 days following primary bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Dahlia M Kenawy; Lindsay M Breslin; J C Chen; Muna M Tamimi; Joann K North; Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul; Sabrena F Noria
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 3.453

5.  Streamlining brain tumor surgery care during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case-control study.

Authors:  Regin Jay Mallari; Michael B Avery; Alex Corlin; Amalia Eisenberg; Terese C Hammond; Neil A Martin; Garni Barkhoudarian; Daniel F Kelly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.