Literature DB >> 22892343

Use of laparoscopy in general surgical operations at academic centers.

Ninh T Nguyen1, Brian Nguyen, Anderson Shih, Brian Smith, Samuel Hohmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopy is commonly being used in many different types of general surgical procedures. The aim of the present study was to examine the use of laparoscopy and perioperative outcomes in 7 general surgical operations commonly performed at U.S. academic medical centers.
METHODS: The clinical data of patients who underwent 1 of the 7 general surgical operations from 2008 to 2012 were obtained from the University HealthSystem Consortium database. The University HealthSystem Consortium database contains data from all major teaching hospitals in the United States. The 7 analyzed operations included only elective, inpatient procedures (except for appendectomy): open and laparoscopic antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux, colectomy for colon cancer or diverticulitis, bariatric surgery for morbid obesity, ventral hernia repair for incisional hernia, appendectomy for acute appendicitis, rectal resection for rectal cancer, and cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis. The outcome measures included the number of procedures, rate of laparoscopy, rate of conversion to laparotomy, and in-hospital mortality.
RESULTS: During the 3.5-year period, 53,958 patients underwent bariatric surgery, 13,918 patients underwent antireflux surgery, 8654 patients underwent appendectomy, 8512 patients underwent cholecystectomy, 29,934 patients underwent colectomy, 17,746 patients underwent ventral hernia repair, and 4729 patients underwent rectal resection. The present rate of laparoscopic use was 94.0% for bariatric surgery, 83.7% for antireflux surgery, 79.2% for appendectomy, 77.1% for cholecystectomy, 52.4% for colectomy, 28.1% for ventral hernia repair, and 18.3% for rectal resection. In-hospital mortality was greatest for colorectal resection (.38%-.58%). In-hospital mortality for bariatric surgery (.06%) was comparable to that for appendectomy (.01%), cholecystectomy (.27%), antireflux surgery (.15%), and ventral hernia repair (.20%). The rate of laparoscopic conversion to open surgery was lowest for bariatric surgery (.89%) and greatest for rectal resection (16.4%).
CONCLUSION: Within the context of academic centers and elective, inpatient procedures, bariatric surgery had the greatest use of laparoscopy and the lowest rate of laparoscopic conversion to open surgery. The mortality for laparoscopic bariatric surgery is now comparable to that of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, ventral hernia repair, appendectomy, and antireflux surgery.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22892343     DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2012.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis        ISSN: 1550-7289            Impact factor:   4.734


  14 in total

1.  Profiling hospitals on bariatric surgery quality: which outcomes are most reliable?

Authors:  Robert W Krell; Jonathan F Finks; Wayne J English; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Utilization and outcome of laparoscopic versus robotic general and bariatric surgical procedures at Academic Medical Centers.

Authors:  James Villamere; Alana Gebhart; Stephen Vu; Ninh T Nguyen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Laparoscopic revolution in bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Magnus Sundbom
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Robotic approaches may offer benefit in colorectal procedures, more controversial in other areas: a review of 168,248 cases.

Authors:  Maria S Altieri; Jie Yang; Dana A Telem; Jiawen Zhu; Caitlin Halbert; Mark Talamini; Aurora D Pryor
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Bariatric Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations.

Authors:  A Thorell; A D MacCormick; S Awad; N Reynolds; D Roulin; N Demartines; M Vignaud; A Alvarez; P M Singh; D N Lobo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Predicting opportunities to increase utilization of laparoscopy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Jiejing Qiu; Anthony J Senagore
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Impact of care coaching on hospital length of stay, readmission rates, postdischarge phone calls, and patient satisfaction after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Anahita Jalilvand; Andrew Suzo; Melissa Hornor; Kristina Layton; Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul; Luke Macadam; Dean Mikami; Bradley Needleman; Sabrena Noria
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 4.734

Review 8.  The emerging role for robotics in cholecystectomy: the dawn of a new era?

Authors:  Jessica A Zaman; Tejender Paul Singh
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 9.  Obesity and liver transplantation.

Authors:  Subhashini Ayloo; John Armstrong; Scott Hurton; Michele Molinari
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2015-09-24

10.  Patient, Hospital, and Geographic Disparities in Laparoscopic Surgery Use Among Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Patients With Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Kendra L Ratnapradipa; Min Lian; Donna B Jeffe; Nicholas O Davidson; Jan M Eberth; Sandi L Pruitt; Mario Schootman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.585

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.