Literature DB >> 27318620

Assessing concentrations and health impacts of air quality management strategies: Framework for Rapid Emissions Scenario and Health impact ESTimation (FRESH-EST).

Chad W Milando1, Sheena E Martenies1, Stuart A Batterman2.   

Abstract

In air quality management, reducing emissions from pollutant sources often forms the primary response to attaining air quality standards and guidelines. Despite the broad success of air quality management in the US, challenges remain. As examples: allocating emissions reductions among multiple sources is complex and can require many rounds of negotiation; health impacts associated with emissions, the ultimate driver for the standards, are not explicitly assessed; and long dispersion model run-times, which result from the increasing size and complexity of model inputs, limit the number of scenarios that can be evaluated, thus increasing the likelihood of missing an optimal strategy. A new modeling framework, called the "Framework for Rapid Emissions Scenario and Health impact ESTimation" (FRESH-EST), is presented to respond to these challenges. FRESH-EST estimates concentrations and health impacts of alternative emissions scenarios at the urban scale, providing efficient computations from emissions to health impacts at the Census block or other desired spatial scale. In addition, FRESH-EST can optimize emission reductions to meet specified environmental and health constraints, and a convenient user interface and graphical displays are provided to facilitate scenario evaluation. The new framework is demonstrated in an SO2 non-attainment area in southeast Michigan with two optimization strategies: the first minimizes emission reductions needed to achieve a target concentration; the second minimizes concentrations while holding constant the cumulative emissions across local sources (e.g., an emissions floor). The optimized strategies match outcomes in the proposed SO2 State Implementation Plan without the proposed stack parameter modifications or shutdowns. In addition, the lower health impacts estimated for these strategies suggest that FRESH-EST could be used to identify potentially more desirable pollution control alternatives in air quality management planning.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Air quality management; FRESH-EST; Health impact assessment; Optimization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27318620      PMCID: PMC5609508          DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  14 in total

1.  Air quality control using a minimum pollution-dispatching algorithm.

Authors:  R L Sullivan; D F Hackett
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  1973-11-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 2.  Health effects of fine particulate air pollution: lines that connect.

Authors:  C Arden Pope; Douglas W Dockery
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.235

3.  Ambient air pollution and asthma exacerbations in children: an eight-city analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan S Schildcrout; Lianne Sheppard; Thomas Lumley; James C Slaughter; Jane Q Koenig; Gail G Shapiro
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Application of the US decision support tool for materials and waste management.

Authors:  Susan A Thorneloe; Keith Weitz; Jenna Jambeck
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 7.145

5.  Association of daily asthma emergency department visits and hospital admissions with ambient air pollutants among the pediatric Medicaid population in Detroit: time-series and time-stratified case-crossover analyses with threshold effects.

Authors:  Shi Li; Stuart Batterman; Elizabeth Wasilevich; Robert Wahl; Julie Wirth; Feng-Chiao Su; Bhramar Mukherjee
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 6.498

6.  Optimization of multipollutant air quality management strategies: A case study for five cities in the United States.

Authors:  Kuo-Jen Liao; Xiangting Hou
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.235

7.  Health impact assessment of traffic-related air pollution at the urban project scale: influence of variability and uncertainty.

Authors:  Chidsanuphong Chart-Asa; Jacqueline MacDonald Gibson
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  The recent and future health burden of air pollution apportioned across U.S. sectors.

Authors:  Neal Fann; Charles M Fulcher; Kirk Baker
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Spatial Resolution Requirements for Traffic-Related Air Pollutant Exposure Evaluations.

Authors:  Stuart Batterman; Sarah Chambliss; Vlad Isakov
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 4.798

10.  Survey of Ambient Air Pollution Health Risk Assessment Tools.

Authors:  Susan C Anenberg; Anna Belova; Jørgen Brandt; Neal Fann; Sue Greco; Sarath Guttikunda; Marie-Eve Heroux; Fintan Hurley; Michal Krzyzanowski; Sylvia Medina; Brian Miller; Kiran Pandey; Joachim Roos; Rita Van Dingenen
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 4.000

View more
  2 in total

1.  Air pollutant strategies to reduce adverse health impacts and health inequalities: a quantitative assessment for Detroit, Michigan.

Authors:  Sheena E Martenies; Chad W Milando; Stuart A Batterman
Journal:  Air Qual Atmos Health       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 3.763

2.  Disease and Health Inequalities Attributable to Air Pollutant Exposure in Detroit, Michigan.

Authors:  Sheena E Martenies; Chad W Milando; Guy O Williams; Stuart A Batterman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.