Literature DB >> 27318182

Shoulder dystocia: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).

Loïc Sentilhes1, Marie-Victoire Sénat2, Anne-Isabelle Boulogne3, Catherine Deneux-Tharaux4, Florent Fuchs2, Guillaume Legendre5, Camille Le Ray6, Emmanuel Lopez7, Thomas Schmitz8, Véronique Lejeune-Saada9.   

Abstract

Shoulder dystocia (SD) is defined as a vaginal delivery in cephalic presentation that requires additional obstetric maneuvers to deliver the fetus after the head has delivered and gentle traction has failed. It complicates 0.5-1% of vaginal deliveries. Risks of brachial plexus birth injury (level of evidence [LE]3), clavicle and humeral fracture (LE3), perinatal asphyxia (LE2), hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (LE3) and perinatal mortality (LE2) increase with SD. Its main risk factors are previous SD and macrosomia, but both are poorly predictive; 50-70% of SD cases occur in their absence, and most deliveries when they are present do not result in SD. No study has proven that the correction of these risk factors (except gestational diabetes) would reduce the risk of SD. Physical activity is recommended before and during pregnancy to reduce the occurrence of some risk factors for SD (Grade C). In obese women, physical activity should be coupled with dietary measures to reduce fetal macrosomia and weight gain during pregnancy (Grade A). Women with gestational diabetes require diabetes care (diabetic diet, glucose monitoring, insulin if needed) (Grade A) because it reduces the risk of macrosomia and SD (LE1). Only two measures are proposed for avoiding SD and its complications. First, induction of labor is recommended in cases of impending macrosomia if the cervix is favorable at a gestational age of 39 weeks or more (professional consensus). Second, cesarean delivery is recommended before labor in three situations and during labor in one: (i) estimated fetal weight (EFW) >4500g if associated with maternal diabetes (Grade C), (ii) EFW >5000g in women without diabetes (Grade C), (iii) history of SD associated with severe neonatal or maternal complications (professional consensus), and finally during labor, (iv) in case of fetal macrosomia and failure to progress in the second stage, when the fetal head station is above +2 (Grade C). In cases of SD, it is recommended to avoid the following actions: excessive traction on the fetal head (Grade C), fundal pressure (Grade C), and inverse rotation of the fetal head (professional consensus). The McRoberts maneuver, with or without suprapubic pressure, is recommended first (Grade C). If it fails and the posterior shoulder is engaged, Wood's maneuver should be performed preferentially; if the posterior shoulder is not engaged, it is preferable to attempt to deliver the posterior arm next (professional consensus). It appears necessary to know at least two maneuvers to perform should the McRoberts maneuver fail (professional consensus). A pediatrician should be immediately informed of SD. The initial clinical examination should check for complications, such as brachial plexus injury or clavicle fracture (professional consensus). If no complications are observed, neonatal monitoring need not be modified (professional consensus). The implementation of practical training with simulation for all care providers in the delivery room is associated with a significant reduction in neonatal (LE3) but not maternal (LE3) injury. SD remains an unpredictable obstetric emergency. All physicians and midwives should know and perform obstetric maneuvers if needed, quickly but calmly.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Shoulder dystocia; brachial plexus palsy; cesarean; fetal macrosomia; induction of labor

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27318182     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.05.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  7 in total

1.  Simulation in shoulder dystocia: does it change outcomes?

Authors:  Tana Kim; Rachel I Vogel; Kamalini Das
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2018-03-29

2.  Impact of fetal manipulation on maternal and neonatal severe morbidity during shoulder dystocia management.

Authors:  Bineta Diack; Fabrice Pierre; Bertrand Gachon
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  The association between an oral glucose tolerance test performed at term pregnancy and obstetric outcomes.

Authors:  Oren Barak; Israel Yoles; Tamar Wainstock; Noa Gadassi; Tal Schiller; Edi Vaisbuch
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2021-11-11

Review 4.  The prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elise Farrington; Mairead Connolly; Laura Phung; Alyce N Wilson; Liz Comrie-Thomson; Meghan A Bohren; Caroline S E Homer; Joshua P Vogel
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 5.  Shoulder dystocia: incidence, mechanisms, and management strategies.

Authors:  Savas Menticoglou
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2018-11-09

6.  Axillary traction: An effective method of resolving shoulder dystocia.

Authors:  Lesley Ansell; David Alan Ansell; Judith McAra-Couper; Peter John Larmer; Nicholas Kenneth Gerald Garrett
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.100

7.  Guidelines for the management of pregnant women with obesity: A systematic review.

Authors:  Alexandre Simon; Misty Pratt; Brian Hutton; Becky Skidmore; Romina Fakhraei; Natalie Rybak; Daniel J Corsi; Mark Walker; Maria P Velez; Graeme N Smith; Laura M Gaudet
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 9.213

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.