Literature DB >> 35519828

Simulation in shoulder dystocia: does it change outcomes?

Tana Kim1,2, Rachel I Vogel2, Kamalini Das1,2.   

Abstract

Background: Shoulder dystocia is an obstetrical emergency that requires immediate and appropriate provider response to decrease neonatal morbidity. Objective: To determine whether institution of shoulder dystocia simulation training improves maternal and neonatal outcomes at delivery. Study design: This retrospective cohort study compared maternal and neonatal outcomes before (1 September 2008-31 December 2009) and after (1 January 2010-31 December 2014) a mandatory shoulder dystocia simulation curriculum was instituted. Χ2 and Fisher's exact tests along with multivariate logistic regression models were conducted to adjust for potential confounding.
Results: Of 8930 vaginal deliveries that met eligibility criteria over the 6-year period, 299 (3.3%) deliveries were complicated by a shoulder dystocia. The adjusted frequency of shoulder dystocia was approximately two times higher after training implementation (1.9% vs 3.8%; adjusted OR=1.80 (1.23 to 2.65), p=0.003). Neonatal outcomes such as brachial plexus injury (5.0% vs 7.7%; p=0.75), clavicle fracture (5.0% vs 4.6%; p=1.00) and humerus fracture (0.0% vs 1.9%; p=1.00) were not statistically different after training. Additionally, no significant differences in episiotomy (5.0% vs 4.6%; p=1.00), postpartum haemorrhage (10.0% vs 12.4%; p=0.80) and severe perineal laceration (10.0% vs 6.6%; p=0.50) were observed. Conclusions: The overall frequency of shoulder dystocia reportedly doubled after training despite stable operative vaginal delivery and caesarean delivery rates. No significant improvements were seen in maternal or neonatal outcomes after simulation training. As shoulder dystocias are rare events, simulation training may not necessarily improve neonatal outcomes, but it may increase overall provider awareness and intervention. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  mannequin; maternal outcomes; neonatal outcomes; shoulder dystocia; simulation training

Year:  2018        PMID: 35519828      PMCID: PMC8936819          DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-000280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn        ISSN: 2056-6697


  19 in total

1.  ACOG practice bulletin clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 40, November 2002.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Improving resident competency in the management of shoulder dystocia with simulation training.

Authors:  Shad Deering; Sarah Poggi; Christian Macedonia; Robert Gherman; Andrew J Satin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  The incidence and severity of shoulder dystocia correlates with a sonographic measurement of asymmetry in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  B F Cohen; S Penning; D Ansley; M Porto; T Garite
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Prevention of brachial plexus injury-12 years of shoulder dystocia training: an interrupted time-series study.

Authors:  J F Crofts; E Lenguerrand; G L Bentham; S Tawfik; H A Claireaux; D Odd; R Fox; T J Draycott
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Neonatal morbidity associated with shoulder dystocia maneuvers.

Authors:  Janine E Spain; Heather A Frey; Methodius G Tuuli; Ryan Colvin; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Critical analysis of risk factors for shoulder dystocia.

Authors:  Avishai Tsur; Ruslan Sergienko; Arnon Wiznitzer; Alexander Zlotnik; Eyal Sheiner
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Training for shoulder dystocia: a trial of simulation using low-fidelity and high-fidelity mannequins.

Authors:  Joanna F Crofts; Christine Bartlett; Denise Ellis; Linda P Hunt; Robert Fox; Timothy J Draycott
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Improving neonatal outcome through practical shoulder dystocia training.

Authors:  Timothy J Draycott; Joanna F Crofts; Jonathan P Ash; Louise V Wilson; Elaine Yard; Thabani Sibanda; Andrew Whitelaw
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Using simulation training to improve shoulder dystocia documentation.

Authors:  Dena Goffman; Hye Heo; Cynthia Chazotte; Irwin R Merkatz; Peter S Bernstein
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  An objective definition of shoulder dystocia: prolonged head-to-body delivery intervals and/or the use of ancillary obstetric maneuvers.

Authors:  C Y Spong; M Beall; D Rodrigues; M G Ross
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 7.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.