Literature DB >> 27317130

Outcomes of elective cryopreserved single or double embryo transfers following failure to conceive after fresh single embryo transfer.

Pedro Augusto Araújo Monteleone1, R J Mirisola2, S P Gonçalves2, Edmund C Baracat2, Paulo C Serafini2.   

Abstract

The main adverse effect of IVF is the high multiple pregnancy rate resulting from the transfer of two or more embryos. The objective was to evaluate pregnancy rates in infertile women with a good prognosis who failed to conceive in a fresh elective single embryo transfer (eSET) and had a second cycle with elective double vitrified-warmed embryo transfer (eDFET) compared with elective single vitrified-warmed embryo transfer (eSFET). A total of 142 intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles using a conventional protocol were evaluated. Good-prognosis patients underwent eSET in a fresh cycle, and those who failed to conceive underwent a second vitrified-warmed embryo transfer: eDFET (n = 102) or eSFET (n = 40). Embryos were transferred and vitrified on day 5 of development. Patients who received eDFET had fewer implantations (30.9%) than eSFET (52.5%; P = 0.004); pregnancy rates were similar (eDFET: 35.3%, eSFET: 42.5%). Patients with the eSFET had one monozygotic twin (5.9%), and 22.2% of eDFET patients had multiple pregnancies. Patients with a good prognosis who failed to conceive in the first fresh eSET did not have an advantage when receiving eDFET in the second cycle, as pregnancy rates were similar; 22.2% of patients in the eDFET group had multiple pregnancies.
Copyright © 2016 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Double embryo transfer; IVF; Infertility; Multiple pregnancies; Single embryo transfer

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27317130     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  5 in total

1.  [Pregnancy and obstetric outcomes of elective single versus double cleavage-stage embryo transfer].

Authors:  Ling Sun; Zhi-Heng Chen; Min-Na Yin; Yu Deng; Jun Liu
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2016-04-20

Review 2.  "One for Sorrow, Two for Joy?": American embryo transfer guideline recommendations, practices, and outcomes for gestational surrogate patients.

Authors:  Pamela M White
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Successful Pregnancies After Adequate Hormonal Replacement in Patients With Combined Pituitary Hormone Deficiencies.

Authors:  Fernanda A Correa; Paulo H M Bianchi; Marcela M Franca; Aline P Otto; Rodrigo J M Rodrigues; Dani Ejzenberg; Paulo C Serafini; Edmundo Chada Baracat; Rossana P V Francisco; Vinicius N Brito; Ivo J P Arnhold; Berenice B Mendonca; Luciani R Carvalho
Journal:  J Endocr Soc       Date:  2017-09-29

4.  Should single embryo transfer be used in patients with any kind of infertility factor? Preliminary outcomes.

Authors:  Pedro Aa Monteleone; Paula Gmf Petersen; Pedro Fm Peregrino; Juliana Miorin; Alecsandra P Gomes; Mariana G Fujii; Hamilton de Martin; Tatiana Cs Bonetti; Sergio P Gonçalves
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2019-08-22

5.  Comparisons of benefits and risks of single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shujuan Ma; Yangqin Peng; Liang Hu; Xiaojuan Wang; Yiquan Xiong; Yi Tang; Jing Tan; Fei Gong
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 5.211

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.