Pasquale Bottalico1, Simone Graetzer2, Arianna Astolfi3, Eric J Hunter2. 1. Voice Biomechanics and Acoustics Laboratory, Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. Electronic address: pb@msu.edu. 2. Voice Biomechanics and Acoustics Laboratory, Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. 3. Department of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The relationship between the silence and voicing accumulations of primary school teachers and the teachers' clinical status was examined to determine whether more voicing accumulations and fewer silence accumulations were measured for the vocally unhealthy subjects than for the healthy subjects, which would imply more vocal loading and fewer short-term recovery moments. METHODS: Twenty-six Italian primary school teachers were allocated by clinicians to three groups: (1) with organic voice disorders, (2) with subjectively mild organic alteration or functional voice symptoms, and (3) normal voice quality and physiology. Continuous silence and voicing periods were measured with the APM3200 during the teachers' 4-hour workdays. The accumulations were grouped into seven time intervals, ranging from 0.03-0.9 to 3.16-10 seconds, according to Italian prosody. The effects of group on silence and voicing accumulations were evaluated. RESULTS: Regarding silence accumulations, Group 1 accumulated higher values in intervals between 0.1 and 3.15 seconds than other groups, whereas Groups 2 and 3 did not differ from each other. Voicing accumulations between 0.17 and 3.15 seconds were higher for subjects with a structural disorder. A higher time dose was accumulated by these subjects (40.6%) than other subjects (Group 2, 31.9%; Group 3, 32.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Although previous research has suggested that a rest period of a few seconds may produce some vocal fatigue recovery, these results indicate that periods shorter than 3.16 seconds may not have an observable effect on recovery. The results provide insight into how vocal fatigue and vocal recovery may relate to voice disorders in occupational voice users.
OBJECTIVES: The relationship between the silence and voicing accumulations of primary school teachers and the teachers' clinical status was examined to determine whether more voicing accumulations and fewer silence accumulations were measured for the vocally unhealthy subjects than for the healthy subjects, which would imply more vocal loading and fewer short-term recovery moments. METHODS: Twenty-six Italian primary school teachers were allocated by clinicians to three groups: (1) with organic voice disorders, (2) with subjectively mild organic alteration or functional voice symptoms, and (3) normal voice quality and physiology. Continuous silence and voicing periods were measured with the APM3200 during the teachers' 4-hour workdays. The accumulations were grouped into seven time intervals, ranging from 0.03-0.9 to 3.16-10 seconds, according to Italian prosody. The effects of group on silence and voicing accumulations were evaluated. RESULTS: Regarding silence accumulations, Group 1 accumulated higher values in intervals between 0.1 and 3.15 seconds than other groups, whereas Groups 2 and 3 did not differ from each other. Voicing accumulations between 0.17 and 3.15 seconds were higher for subjects with a structural disorder. A higher time dose was accumulated by these subjects (40.6%) than other subjects (Group 2, 31.9%; Group 3, 32.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Although previous research has suggested that a rest period of a few seconds may produce some vocal fatigue recovery, these results indicate that periods shorter than 3.16 seconds may not have an observable effect on recovery. The results provide insight into how vocal fatigue and vocal recovery may relate to voice disorders in occupational voice users.
Authors: Harold A Cheyne; Helen M Hanson; Ronald P Genereux; Kenneth N Stevens; Robert E Hillman Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: M Sliwinska-Kowalska; E Niebudek-Bogusz; M Fiszer; T Los-Spychalska; P Kotylo; B Sznurowska-Przygocka; M Modrzewska Journal: Folia Phoniatr Logop Date: 2006 Impact factor: 0.849
Authors: Jarrad H Van Stan; Daryush D Mehta; Andrew J Ortiz; James A Burns; Laura E Toles; Katherine L Marks; Mark Vangel; Tiffiny Hron; Steven Zeitels; Robert E Hillman Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2020-01-29 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Katherine L Marks; Jonathan Z Lin; Annie B Fox; Laura E Toles; Daryush D Mehta Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2019-09-13 Impact factor: 2.297
Authors: Thomas H Whittico; Andrew J Ortiz; Katherine L Marks; Laura E Toles; Jarrad H Van Stan; Robert E Hillman; Daryush D Mehta Journal: J Acoust Soc Am Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 1.840