| Literature DB >> 27315804 |
Yu Du1, Marcia L Spetch2, Weimin Mou1.
Abstract
Numerous studies have shown that people and other animals readily use horizontal geometry (distance and directional information) to reorient, and these cues sometimes dominate over other cues when reorienting in navigable environments. Our study investigated whether horizontal cues (distance/angle) dominate over vertical cues (wall height) when they are in conflict. Adult participants learned two locations (opposite corners) in either a rectangular room (with distance information) or a rhombus room (with angle information). Both training rooms had 2 opposite high walls as height cues. On each trial, participants were disoriented and then asked to locate the correct corners. In testing, the rooms were modified to provide (a) distance or angle cues only, (b) height cues only, and (c) both height and horizontal cues in conflict. Participants located the correct corners successfully with horizontal (distance/angle) or height cues alone. On conflict tests, participants did not show preference for the horizontal information (distance/angle) over the height cues. The results are discussed in terms of the geometric module theory and the adaptive combination theory.Entities:
Keywords: Adaptive combination theory; Geometric cues; Geometric module; Height; Spatial reorientation
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27315804 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-016-0627-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mem Cognit ISSN: 0090-502X