Literature DB >> 27315127

Response of macrophyte communities to flow regulation in mountain streams.

Silverio Abati1, Maria Rita Minciardi2, Simone Ciadamidaro2, Simone Fattorini3,4, Simona Ceschin5.   

Abstract

River macrophytes are widely used in freshwater ecosystem assessment because of their sensitivity to anthropogenic pressures, even if there are only a few studies that investigated how macrophytes respond to water regime alterations. In this study, we analyzed the effects of dams on river macrophyte communities through a comparison between upstream and downstream sides from 18 dams located in Alps and Apennines. A co-inertia analysis and a Mantel test were applied to assess if the analysis of environmental parameters could be effective in predicting macrophyte community structure. We analyzed morphological and physicochemical inter-site differences and tested the influence of dams on various aspects of community structure (composition, richness, diversity, dominance, coverage) using multivariate randomized block permutation procedure. Plant similarity between sites was evaluated at the level of phylum, and indicator species analysis was performed to identify the taxa most sensitive or tolerant to water regulation. We found that the overall environmental setting overwhelms the dam impact and that the influence of hydrological alteration became apparent when comparing upstream and downstream assemblages at the same dam. In particular, we found that most of taxa had a higher affinity with the downstream side and that in general, stream regulation increases plant richness and coverage, but reduces community evenness. Analyses based on higher taxonomic groups (phyla) demonstrated that this community can be effectively used in bioassessment even at phylum level analysis. In particular, we found that bryophytes, strictly linked with changes in substrate stability, show particular sensitivity to water regulation in mountain streams.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alpine streams; Aquatic plant; Bioassessment; Bryophytes; Dam impact; River flow regulation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27315127     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5420-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   3.307


  6 in total

1.  Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity.

Authors:  Stuart E Bunn; Angela H Arthington
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 2.  Flow controls on lowland river macrophytes: a review.

Authors:  Paul Franklin; Michael Dunbar; Paul Whitehead
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Pseudoreplication is a pseudoproblem.

Authors:  Jeffrey C Schank; Thomas J Koehnle
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity.

Authors:  C J Vörösmarty; P B McIntyre; M O Gessner; D Dudgeon; A Prusevich; P Green; S Glidden; S E Bunn; C A Sullivan; C Reidy Liermann; P M Davies
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Why most published research findings are false.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 11.613

6.  The search for reference conditions for stream vegetation in northern Europe.

Authors:  Annette Baattrup-Pedersen; Gunta Springe; Tenna Riis; Søren E Larsen; Kaj Sand-Jensen; Lars M Kjellerup Larsen
Journal:  Freshw Biol       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 3.809

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  The Hydra regeneration assay reveals ecological risks in running waters: a new proposal to detect environmental teratogenic threats.

Authors:  Lorenzo Traversetti; Floriano Del Grosso; Valentina Malafoglia; Marco Colasanti; Simona Ceschin; Stefano Larsen; Massimiliano Scalici
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Responses of aquatic macrophytes to anthropogenic pressures: comparison between macrophyte metrics and indices.

Authors:  Julio A Camargo
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Aquatic Plant Diversity in Italy: Distribution, Drivers and Strategic Conservation Actions.

Authors:  Rossano Bolpagni; Alex Laini; Chiara Stanzani; Alessandro Chiarucci
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 4.  Aquatic plants and ecotoxicological assessment in freshwater ecosystems: a review.

Authors:  Simona Ceschin; Amii Bellini; Massimiliano Scalici
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 5.190

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.