Literature DB >> 27315070

[Cardiac hemodynamics during shock : Management in daily clinical routine].

A Kersten1.   

Abstract

In caring for critically ill patients, a sophisticated approach to treating hemodynamic instability in acute circulatory failure is a major concern of modern critical care. Depending on the form of shock-distributive, cardiogenic, hypovolemic or obstructive, with the possibility of overlapping forms of shock-preload, afterload, cardiac output, and contractility are altered in various ways. Modern critical care uses hemodynamic monitoring and bedside echocardiography in addition to clinical evaluation to treat the underlying cause and sequelae of shock. Fluid therapy taking volume responsiveness and need for volume into account, vasopressor therapy taking microcirculatory derangement into account, and therapy using inotropes, sometimes in combination with vasodilators are the cornerstones of critical care treatment in this regard. Preload, afterload, cardiac output, and contractility must thereby be evaluated and treated in a patient- and situation-specific manner.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac contractility; Cardiac output; Critical care; Critical care outcomes; Ventricular function

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27315070     DOI: 10.1007/s00063-016-0168-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed        ISSN: 2193-6218            Impact factor:   0.840


  34 in total

1.  Current approach to the haemodynamic management of septic shock patients in European intensive care units: a cross-sectional, self-reported questionnaire-based survey.

Authors:  Christian Torgersen; Martin W Dünser; Christian A Schmittinger; Ville Pettilä; Esko Ruokonen; Volker Wenzel; Stephan M Jakob; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Passive leg raising for predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xavier Monnet; Paul Marik; Jean-Louis Teboul
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Proposed reclassification of shock states with special reference to distributive defects.

Authors:  M H Weil; H Shubin
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Does dopamine administration in shock influence outcome? Results of the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients (SOAP) Study.

Authors:  Yasser Sakr; Konrad Reinhart; Jean-Louis Vincent; Charles L Sprung; Rui Moreno; V Marco Ranieri; Daniel De Backer; Didier Payen
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Patrick Biston; Jacques Devriendt; Christian Madl; Didier Chochrad; Cesar Aldecoa; Alexandre Brasseur; Pierre Defrance; Philippe Gottignies; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  What is a fluid challenge?

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; Anthony K Parsons; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.687

7.  Arterial blood pressure during early sepsis and outcome.

Authors:  Martin W Dünser; Jukka Takala; Hanno Ulmer; Viktoria D Mayr; Günter Luckner; Stefan Jochberger; Fritz Daudel; Philipp Lepper; Walter R Hasibeder; Stephan M Jakob
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Experimental and clinical studies on lactate and pyruvate as indicators of the severity of acute circulatory failure (shock).

Authors:  M H Weil; A A Afifi
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1970-06       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  James A Russell; Keith R Walley; Joel Singer; Anthony C Gordon; Paul C Hébert; D James Cooper; Cheryl L Holmes; Sangeeta Mehta; John T Granton; Michelle M Storms; Deborah J Cook; Jeffrey J Presneill; Dieter Ayers
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  A positive fluid balance is associated with a worse outcome in patients with acute renal failure.

Authors:  Didier Payen; Anne Cornélie de Pont; Yasser Sakr; Claudia Spies; Konrad Reinhart; Jean Louis Vincent
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.