| Literature DB >> 27314001 |
Abstract
The power spectral density (PSD) of heart rate variability (HRV) contains a power-law relationship that can be obtained by plotting the logarithm of PSD against the logarithm of frequency. The PSD of HRV can be decomposed mathematically into a power-law function and a residual HRV (rHRV) spectrum. Almost all rHRV measures are significantly smaller than their corresponding HRV measures except the normalized high-frequency power (nrHFP). The power-law function can be characterized by the slope and Y-intercept of linear regression. Almost all HRV measures except the normalized low-frequency power have significant correlations with the Y-intercept, while almost all rHRV measures except the total power [residual total power (rTP)] do not. Though some rHRV measures still correlate significantly with the age of the subjects, the rTP, high-frequency power (rHFP), nrHFP, and low-/high-frequency power ratio (rLHR) do not. In conclusion, the clinical significances of rHRV measures might be different from those of traditional HRV measures. The Y-intercept might be a better HRV measure for clinical use because it is independent of almost all rHRV measures. The rTP, rHFP, nrHFP, and rLHR might be more suitable for the study of age-independent autonomic nervous modulation of the subjects.Entities:
Keywords: Y-intercept; decomposition; fractal; heart rate variability; power spectrum; power-law function; slope
Year: 2016 PMID: 27314001 PMCID: PMC4889601 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2016.00016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
General characteristics and the slope and .
| Gender (M/F) | 23/37 |
| Age (years) | 34.9 ± 13.4 |
| Body height (cm) | 164.2 ± 8.6 |
| Body weight (kg) | 60.2 ± 10.2 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 22.2 ± 2.6 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 115.8 ± 14.8 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 72.9 ± 9.4 |
| Pulse pressure (mmHg) | 42.9 ± 10.7 |
| Mean arterial blood pressure (mmHg) | 87.2 ± 10.3 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 76.5 ± 9.9 |
| Slope | 1.34 ± 0.36 |
| 1.39 ± 0.55 |
Figure 1The power spectrum of traditional HRV (A), the linear plot of log(PSD) versus log(Frq) (B), the power-law function between PSD.
Figure 2The comparison of traditional HRV measures with the corresponding rHRV measures. # indicates statistical significance vs. corresponding HRV measure.
Figure 3The dependence of traditional HRV measures and rHRV measures on the slope of linear regression or the exponent of power-law function.
Figure 4The dependence of traditional HRV measures and rHRV measures on the .
Figure 5The dependence of traditional HRV measures and rHRV measures on the age of the subjects.