Literature DB >> 27313797

The use of a novel in-bed active Leg Exercise Apparatus (LEX) for increasing venous blood flow.

Kenta Tanaka1, Hiroshi Kamada1, Yukiyo Shimizu2, Shizu Aikawa3, Tomofumi Nishino1, Naoyuki Ochiai4, Masataka Sakane1, Masashi Yamazaki1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) and leg deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has increased in recent years in association with aging and an increase in the number of bedridden individuals. We developed an active in-bed leg exercise apparatus labeled the Leg Exercise Apparatus (LEX) for DVT prevention. We compared the effect of leg exercises performed using the LEX to conventional active ankle exercises on increased blood flow. MATERIALS &
METHODS: The subjects were eight healthy adult volunteers [five men and three women, aged 20-34 (mean 27.0) years]. Subjects performed two types of exercise; exercise 1 consisted of leg exercises using the LEX, while exercise 2 consisted of in-bed active plantar flexion/dorsiflexion exercises without the device. Measurements were taken 1, 5, 10, 20, and 30 minutes after exercise including common femoral vein blood flow, mean blood flow velocity, maximum blood flow velocity, and vessel diameter using Doppler ultrasound. Statistical procedures included timed measurement data analysis using a linear mixed model. A Bonferroni correction was used for multiple comparisons.
RESULTS: Compared to resting levels, blood flow reached a maximum value 1 minute after exercise for both exercise types, with a significantly greater increase after exercise 1 (1.76-fold increase) compared to exercise 2 (1.44-fold increase) (p = 0.005). There was a significant difference (p = 0.03) between the two exercises for all values from 1 minute to 30 minutes following exercise. There was no significant difference between exercises for peak or mean blood flow velocity. Compared to resting levels, blood vessel diameter reached a maximum value of 1.47-fold greater at 5 minutes post-exercise for exercise 1 and a maximum value of 1.21-fold greater at 1 minute post-exercise for exercise 2.
CONCLUSIONS: Exercise using the LEX increased lower leg venous blood flow and vessel diameter. We propose that the LEX may serve as a new DVT prevention tool.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood flow; exercise; venous thrombosis

Year:  2016        PMID: 27313797      PMCID: PMC4910027          DOI: 10.2185/jrm.2906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rural Med        ISSN: 1880-487X


Introduction

The incidence of lower limb deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) has increased in recent years in association with aging and an increase in the number of bedridden individuals[1]). In various DVT/PE prevention guidelines, including those for perioperative management, the recommended physical prevention methods include wearing compression stockings, using an intermittent pneumatic compression device, and encouraging mobility. Prophylactic administration of antithrombotic drugs is also recommended[2],[3],[4]). Many physical prevention methods are effective because they improve blood flow in the legs which is otherwise stagnant during bed rest[5],[6],[7],[8]). However, mobility is difficult for bedridden individuals, and long-term bed rest in particular is a risk factor for DVT. Many reports show an increase in femoral vein blood flow associated with active ankle exercises[9], [10]). However, postoperative patients are poorly motivated to be proactive in performing active ankle exercises, and in many cases effective exercise is not possible. Consequently, we have worked independently to create an active in-bed leg exercise apparatus, which we have labeled the Leg Exercise Apparatus (LEX), in order to enhance the blood flow-increasing effect of active ankle exercises in bedridden individuals. The LEX is a device that aims to increase leg blood flow by performance of a pedaling motion via directly attached foot pedals[11], [12]). The objective of this study is to compare post exercise blood flow following active in-bed leg exercises using the LEX and conventionally recommended active ankle exercises.

Materials and Methods

LEX

The LEX has a stainless steel base along with left and right arms and pedals. Leather soles were installed on the pedals to prevent slippage (Figure 1). Range of motion of the pedals allows for 30° of dorsiflexion, 60° of plantar flexion, 30° of inversion, and 20° of eversion; moreover, the arms rotate. This allows not only for plantar flexion and dorsiflexion, but also for more complex pedaling exercises that include inversion and eversion. Arch supports were installed inside the soles, making it possible to compress the venous plexuses of the feet during the pedaling exercise (Figures 2 and 3).
Figure 1

The Leg Exercise Apparatus (LEX).

Figure 2

Sole of the Leg Exercise Apparatus with the arch support pad.

Figure 3

Lateral views of lower limb movement using the Leg Exercise Apparatus. Maximum dorsiflexion (left), maximum plantar flexion (right).

The Leg Exercise Apparatus (LEX). Sole of the Leg Exercise Apparatus with the arch support pad. Lateral views of lower limb movement using the Leg Exercise Apparatus. Maximum dorsiflexion (left), maximum plantar flexion (right). The subjects were eight healthy adult volunteers (five men and three women) aged 20–34 years (mean 27.0 years) (Table 1). All subjects provided written informed consent, and the study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of Tsukuba University Hospital.
Table 1

Characteristics of subjects

SubjectSexAgeHeightWeight
1Male2016760
2Male2417457
3Male2716860
4Male28177110
5Male3218479
6Female2216054
7Female2914850
8Female3415548
The experiment was conducted in a specified room kept at a constant temperature of 25°C with a humidity level of 50–57%. Blood flow was measured using the ultrasonic Doppler method (EUB 7500®, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) using a 5 to 13-MHz linear probe, as used in previous studies[9], [11]). Measurements included blood flow, mean blood flow velocity, maximum blood flow velocity, and vessel diameter of the right common femoral vein. The examination was performed by a single, trained cardiovascular surgeon. There were two different exercise methods. Exercise 1 (Ex-[1]) consisted of leg exercises using the LEX. With the patient in a supine resting position, the examiner supported the legs of each subject and fitted them to the LEX so that the knee joint could extend to 30°. Complex exercises incorporating plantar flexion/dorsiflexion, inversion/eversion, and knee and hip flexion/extension were performed for 1 minute at 30 cycles/minute. Exercise-2 (Ex-[2]) consisted of in-bed active plantar flexion/dorsiflexion exercises without the device. In supine, subjects positioned the hip in slight flexion with the knee in 30° of flexion and performed maximum-effort plantar flexion/dorsiflexion exercises at 30 cycles/minute (Figure 4). A cycle for each ankle was defined as going from maximum dorsiflexion to maximum plantar flexion and back to the starting position, and the pace was controlled using a metronome. Subjects performed the experiment while wearing compression stockings and were trained in both Ex-[1] and [2] in advance until they were able to acclimate to the exercise methods. Subjects were randomly assigned to perform either Ex-[1] or Ex-[2] first.
Figure 4

Exercises using the novel active Leg Exercise Apparatus (upper) and traditional simple active ankle movements (lower).

Exercises using the novel active Leg Exercise Apparatus (upper) and traditional simple active ankle movements (lower). Subjects rested in a supine position for at least 30 minutes, and resting blood flow measurements were obtained after blood flow parameters of the common femoral vein had stabilized. Ex-[1] or [2] was performed immediately after resting blood flow measurements. After completing the 1-minute exercise, measurements were obtained 1, 5, 10, 20, and 30 minutes after exercise. Subjects then took a 90-minute break, and again rested in the supine position for 30 minutes. And resting blood flow measurements were obtained after blood flow parameters of the common femoral vein had stabilized, after which they performed the remaining exercise, and blood flow measurements were repeated in the same manner. For Ex-[1] and [2], post-exercise values for blood flow, peak blood flow velocity, mean blood flow velocity, and blood vessel diameter were divided by the pre-exercise values to calculate the respective ratios of each. Differences between exercises were then tested using these ratios. Statistical analysis included timed measurement data analysis using a linear mixed model, and the Bonferroni correction was used for multiple comparisons (p < 0.05).

Results

Blood flow reached a maximum value 1 minute after exercise for both Ex-[1] and [2], at which time blood flow measured 0.65 ± 0.3 L/min and 0.54 ± 0.2 L/min, respectively (Table 2). These values were 1.76 and 1.44 times greater than resting blood flow for Ex-[1] and [2] respectively (F(1, 7) = 16.498, p = 0.005). Moreover, a significant difference was observed between the two exercises for all values 1 minute to 30 minutes after exercise in a two-way linear mixed model (F(1, 77) = 9.138, p = 0.03). No interaction between exercise method and time was observed (Figure 5).
Table 2

Mean (± SD) hemodynamic response to Ex [1] and Ex [2]

timeBlood flow volume (L/min)Vessel diameter (mm)Peak velocity (cm/sec)Mean velocity (cm/sec)




Ex [1]Ex [2]Ex [1]Ex [2]Ex [1]Ex [2]Ex [1]Ex [2]
00.39 ± 0.20.40 ± 0.27.2 ± 2.47.8 ± 3.120.6 ± 7.020.8 ± 7.49.7 ± 5.29.0 ± 4.5
10.65 ± 0.30.54 ± 0.29.5 ± 2.69.3 ± 3.921.9 ± 5.920.7 ± 5.911.4 ± 3.39.9 ± 2.1
50.61 ± 0.20.48 ± 0.110.2 ± 2.79.1 ± 3.820.0 ± 5.218.6 ± 5.510.2 ± 2.99.1 ± 1.5
100.61 ± 0.30.48 ± 0.29.3 ± 2.29.0 ± 4.121.3 ± 5.721.0 ± 7.310.8 ± 3.29.5 ± 3.0
200.53 ± 0.30.53 ± 0.29.1 ± 2.88.9 ± 3.419.5 ± 4.422.7 ± 7.78.9 ± 3.310.2 ± 3.2
300.51 ± 0.20.48 ± 0.28.7 ± 2.98.3 ± 3.620.7 ± 8.323.0 ± 10.010.0 ± 4.411.1 ± 6.5
Figure 5

Blood flow relative to resting levels. Ex-[1]: Exercises using the Leg Exercise Apparatus. Ex-[2]: In-bed active plantar flexion/dorsiflexion exercises without the device. A significant difference was observed between the two exercises for all values 1 minute to 30 minutes after exercise in a two-way linear mixed model (α = 0.05). A significant difference using post-hoc Bonferroni correction was observed at 1 min. ** p < 0.05; GLM, general linear model.

Blood flow relative to resting levels. Ex-[1]: Exercises using the Leg Exercise Apparatus. Ex-[2]: In-bed active plantar flexion/dorsiflexion exercises without the device. A significant difference was observed between the two exercises for all values 1 minute to 30 minutes after exercise in a two-way linear mixed model (α = 0.05). A significant difference using post-hoc Bonferroni correction was observed at 1 min. ** p < 0.05; GLM, general linear model. Maximum blood vessel diameter after Ex-[1] reached 10.2 ± 2.7 mm, 1.47-fold greater than resting values at 5 minutes after exercise, while maximum vessel diameter following Ex-[2] reached 9.3 ± 3.9 mm, 1.21-fold greater than resting values at 1 minute after exercise. Blood vessel diameter for Ex-[1] exceeded that of Ex-[2] at all measured post-exercise time points; the difference between exercise methods was significant from 1 minute to 30 minutes after exercise (F(1, 77) = 17.006, p < 0.001). Again, there was no interaction between exercise method and time (Figure 6).
Figure 6

Blood vessel diameter relative to resting measurements. Ex-[1]: Exercises using the Leg Exercise Apparatus. Ex-[2]: In-bed active plantar flexion/dorsiflexion exercises without the device. A significant difference was observed between the two exercise methods for all values 1 minute to 30 minutes after exercise in a two-way linear mixed model. * (α = 0.05).

Blood vessel diameter relative to resting measurements. Ex-[1]: Exercises using the Leg Exercise Apparatus. Ex-[2]: In-bed active plantar flexion/dorsiflexion exercises without the device. A significant difference was observed between the two exercise methods for all values 1 minute to 30 minutes after exercise in a two-way linear mixed model. * (α = 0.05). For Ex-[1], peak blood flow velocity reached a maximum value 1 minute after exercise, at 1.10 times the resting peak blood flow velocity. For Ex-[2], peak blood flow velocity reached a maximum value 20 minutes after exercise, at 1.10 times the resting peak blood flow velocity (Figure 7). Mean blood flow velocity reached a maximum value 1 minute after exercise for both Ex-[1] and [2], at 1.36 times and 1.22 times the resting mean blood flow velocity, respectively (Figure 8). There were no significant differences between exercises for peak blood flow velocity or mean blood flow velocity.
Figure 7

Rate of peak blood flow velocity increase relative to resting measurements. Ex-[1]: Exercises using the Leg Exercise Apparatus. Ex-[2]: In-bed active plantar flexion/dorsiflexion exercises without the device. Peak blood flow velocity reached a maximum value 1 minute after exercise for Ex-[1] and 20 minutes after exercise for Ex-[2]. There was no significant difference between exercises.

Figure 8

Time course of changes in mean blood flow velocity relative to resting measurements. Ex-[1]: Exercises using the Leg Exercise Apparatus. Ex-[2]: In-bed active plantar flexion/dorsiflexion exercises without the device. Mean blood flow reached a maximum value 1 minute after exercise for both Ex-[1] and [2]. There was no significant difference between exercises.

Rate of peak blood flow velocity increase relative to resting measurements. Ex-[1]: Exercises using the Leg Exercise Apparatus. Ex-[2]: In-bed active plantar flexion/dorsiflexion exercises without the device. Peak blood flow velocity reached a maximum value 1 minute after exercise for Ex-[1] and 20 minutes after exercise for Ex-[2]. There was no significant difference between exercises. Time course of changes in mean blood flow velocity relative to resting measurements. Ex-[1]: Exercises using the Leg Exercise Apparatus. Ex-[2]: In-bed active plantar flexion/dorsiflexion exercises without the device. Mean blood flow reached a maximum value 1 minute after exercise for both Ex-[1] and [2]. There was no significant difference between exercises.

Discussion

Various DVT prevention guidelines recommend active in-bed plantar flexion/dorsiflexion exercises to prevent DVT. The causes of DVT are not clearly understood. Generally, Virchow’s triad (abnormalities in blood flow, blood constituents, and the vessel wall) is thought to be relevant[13]). To better understand blood flow during active ankle exercises, Sochart et al. assessed blood flow during in-bed active ankle exercise in healthy individuals and found that the mean blood flow velocity of the common femoral vein was 1.38 times greater during exercise than at rest and that the maximum velocity was 1.58 times greater during exercise than at rest[9]). McNally et al. had patients perform one minute of active plantar flexion/dorsiflexion exercises on day 4 following hip replacement surgery and used strain gauge plethysmography to measure the maximum blood flow volume over time. The maximum blood flow was reached 12 minutes after exercise and was 1.22 times greater than at rest[10]). Values from these previous studies are similar to those in the present study for Ex-[2], in which blood flow volume and mean blood flow velocity one minute after exercise were 1.44 times and 1.22 times greater than resting levels, respectively. Thus, the active plantar flexion/dorsiflexion exercises increased blood flow similarly to previous studies. By comparison, blood flow following LEX was 1.76 times greater than at rest, which is significantly different from the blood flow increase that occurred following conventional exercises. Blood flow volume is thought to be related to blood viscosity, which is a risk factor for blood coagulation[14]). Therefore, increased blood flow following LEX could be effective for DVT prevention. In contrast, peak blood flow velocity in both Ex-[1] and [2] had low rates of elevation, peaking at 1.10 times greater than at rest. In the study by Sochart et al.[9]), blood flow velocity was measured during active plantar flexion/dorsiflexion exercises same as Ex-[2], resulting in 1.58 times higher compared to the rest at peak blood flow velocity. Alternatively, in the study by McNally et al.[10]) which measurements were taken after active plantar flexion/dorsiflexion exercises, peak blood flow occurred later rather than immediately after exercise. Peak blood flow velocity was expected to be highest during exercise, but it was not possible to measure blood flow during exercise because of properties of LEX. It’s a limitation of this study. Of note, quantitative differences in the increase in blood flow volume was significant but maximum mean blood flow velocity was not significant; therefore we could not determine the relationship between these two parameters and no research has been performed to assess blood vessel diameter. The current study demonstrates greater increases in blood vessel diameter following exercises using LEX than with conventional exercises. Since mean and peak velocity of blood flow did not change following exercise, we concluded that the increase in blood flow was related to blood vessel diameter. Possible mechanisms for the increased blood flow include muscle pumping action[15]) or autonomic nervous system impact on hemodynamics. However, during exercise using the LEX, cardiac pumping ability may also contribute. One limitation of this experiment is that it was conducted in healthy individuals, and it is possible that these exercises might be difficult for bedridden individuals to perform. The feasibility and outcomes of the exercises should also be verified in older individuals.

Conclusions

Exercise using the LEX increased lower leg venous blood flow and blood vessel diameter. These findings support LEX use as a DVT prevention tool.
  14 in total

Review 1.  Peripheral vascular disease and Virchow's triad for thrombogenesis.

Authors:  A Makin; S H Silverman; G Y H Lip
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2002-04

2.  Prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Yngve Falck-Ytter; Charles W Francis; Norman A Johanson; Catherine Curley; Ola E Dahl; Sam Schulman; Thomas L Ortel; Stephen G Pauker; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  The efficacy of a new portable sequential compression device (SCD Express) in preventing venous stasis.

Authors:  Stavros K Kakkos; Maura Griffin; George Geroulakos; Andrew N Nicolaides
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  The effect of active movement of the foot on venous blood flow after total hip replacement.

Authors:  M A McNally; E A Cooke; R A Mollan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Circulatory responses to voluntary and electrically induced muscle contractions in humans.

Authors:  B F Miller; K G Gruben; B J Morgan
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2000-01

6.  The efficacy of the new SCD response compression system in the prevention of venous stasis.

Authors:  S K Kakkos; G Szendro; M Griffin; S S Daskalopoulou; A N Nicolaides
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  The relationship of foot and ankle movements to venous return in the lower limb.

Authors:  D H Sochart; K Hardinge
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-07

Review 8.  [Thromboprophylaxis of venous thromboembolism].

Authors:  Takao Kobayashi
Journal:  Nihon Rinsho       Date:  2014-07

9.  A novel apparatus for active leg exercise improves venous flow in the lower extremity.

Authors:  Yukiyo Shimizu; Hiroshi Kamada; Masataka Sakane; Shizu Aikawa; Hirotaka Mutsuzaki; Kenta Tanaka; Hajime Mishima; Naoyuki Ochiai; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 1.637

10.  The geko™ electro-stimulation device for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: a NICE medical technology guidance.

Authors:  Jennifer A Summers; James Clinch; Muralikrishnan Radhakrishnan; Andy Healy; Viktoria McMillan; Elizabeth Morris; Tiago Rua; Mercy Ofuya; Yanzhong Wang; Paul W Dimmock; Cornelius Lewis; Janet L Peacock; Stephen F Keevil
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.561

View more
  2 in total

1.  Analysis of risk factors for deep venous thrombosis in patients with gynecological malignant tumor: A clinical study.

Authors:  Qun Li; Yinling Xue; Yuan Peng; Lin Li
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.088

2.  Feasibility and Safety of a Novel Leg Exercise Apparatus for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis after Total Joint Arthroplasty of the Lower Extremities-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Kenta Tanaka; Yukiyo Shimizu; Hiroshi Kamada; Shizu Aikawa; Hajime Mishima; Akihiro Kanamori; Tomofumi Nishino; Masataka Sakane; Naoyuki Ochiai; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2021-11-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.