| Literature DB >> 27313797 |
Kenta Tanaka1, Hiroshi Kamada1, Yukiyo Shimizu2, Shizu Aikawa3, Tomofumi Nishino1, Naoyuki Ochiai4, Masataka Sakane1, Masashi Yamazaki1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) and leg deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has increased in recent years in association with aging and an increase in the number of bedridden individuals. We developed an active in-bed leg exercise apparatus labeled the Leg Exercise Apparatus (LEX) for DVT prevention. We compared the effect of leg exercises performed using the LEX to conventional active ankle exercises on increased blood flow. MATERIALS &Entities:
Keywords: blood flow; exercise; venous thrombosis
Year: 2016 PMID: 27313797 PMCID: PMC4910027 DOI: 10.2185/jrm.2906
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Rural Med ISSN: 1880-487X
Figure 1The Leg Exercise Apparatus (LEX).
Figure 2Sole of the Leg Exercise Apparatus with the arch support pad.
Figure 3Lateral views of lower limb movement using the Leg Exercise Apparatus. Maximum dorsiflexion (left), maximum plantar flexion (right).
Characteristics of subjects
| Subject | Sex | Age | Height | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Male | 20 | 167 | 60 |
| 2 | Male | 24 | 174 | 57 |
| 3 | Male | 27 | 168 | 60 |
| 4 | Male | 28 | 177 | 110 |
| 5 | Male | 32 | 184 | 79 |
| 6 | Female | 22 | 160 | 54 |
| 7 | Female | 29 | 148 | 50 |
| 8 | Female | 34 | 155 | 48 |
Figure 4Exercises using the novel active Leg Exercise Apparatus (upper) and traditional simple active ankle movements (lower).
Mean (± SD) hemodynamic response to Ex [1] and Ex [2]
| time | Blood flow volume (L/min) | Vessel diameter (mm) | Peak velocity (cm/sec) | Mean velocity (cm/sec) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ex [1] | Ex [2] | Ex [1] | Ex [2] | Ex [1] | Ex [2] | Ex [1] | Ex [2] | ||||
| 0 | 0.39 ± 0.2 | 0.40 ± 0.2 | 7.2 ± 2.4 | 7.8 ± 3.1 | 20.6 ± 7.0 | 20.8 ± 7.4 | 9.7 ± 5.2 | 9.0 ± 4.5 | |||
| 1 | 0.65 ± 0.3 | 0.54 ± 0.2 | 9.5 ± 2.6 | 9.3 ± 3.9 | 21.9 ± 5.9 | 20.7 ± 5.9 | 11.4 ± 3.3 | 9.9 ± 2.1 | |||
| 5 | 0.61 ± 0.2 | 0.48 ± 0.1 | 10.2 ± 2.7 | 9.1 ± 3.8 | 20.0 ± 5.2 | 18.6 ± 5.5 | 10.2 ± 2.9 | 9.1 ± 1.5 | |||
| 10 | 0.61 ± 0.3 | 0.48 ± 0.2 | 9.3 ± 2.2 | 9.0 ± 4.1 | 21.3 ± 5.7 | 21.0 ± 7.3 | 10.8 ± 3.2 | 9.5 ± 3.0 | |||
| 20 | 0.53 ± 0.3 | 0.53 ± 0.2 | 9.1 ± 2.8 | 8.9 ± 3.4 | 19.5 ± 4.4 | 22.7 ± 7.7 | 8.9 ± 3.3 | 10.2 ± 3.2 | |||
| 30 | 0.51 ± 0.2 | 0.48 ± 0.2 | 8.7 ± 2.9 | 8.3 ± 3.6 | 20.7 ± 8.3 | 23.0 ± 10.0 | 10.0 ± 4.4 | 11.1 ± 6.5 | |||
Figure 5Blood flow relative to resting levels. Ex-[1]: Exercises using the Leg Exercise Apparatus. Ex-[2]: In-bed active plantar flexion/dorsiflexion exercises without the device. A significant difference was observed between the two exercises for all values 1 minute to 30 minutes after exercise in a two-way linear mixed model (α = 0.05). A significant difference using post-hoc Bonferroni correction was observed at 1 min. ** p < 0.05; GLM, general linear model.
Figure 6Blood vessel diameter relative to resting measurements. Ex-[1]: Exercises using the Leg Exercise Apparatus. Ex-[2]: In-bed active plantar flexion/dorsiflexion exercises without the device. A significant difference was observed between the two exercise methods for all values 1 minute to 30 minutes after exercise in a two-way linear mixed model. * (α = 0.05).
Figure 7Rate of peak blood flow velocity increase relative to resting measurements. Ex-[1]: Exercises using the Leg Exercise Apparatus. Ex-[2]: In-bed active plantar flexion/dorsiflexion exercises without the device. Peak blood flow velocity reached a maximum value 1 minute after exercise for Ex-[1] and 20 minutes after exercise for Ex-[2]. There was no significant difference between exercises.
Figure 8Time course of changes in mean blood flow velocity relative to resting measurements. Ex-[1]: Exercises using the Leg Exercise Apparatus. Ex-[2]: In-bed active plantar flexion/dorsiflexion exercises without the device. Mean blood flow reached a maximum value 1 minute after exercise for both Ex-[1] and [2]. There was no significant difference between exercises.