Literature DB >> 27313739

Phase II trial of panitumumab with irinotecan as salvage therapy for patients with advanced or recurrent colorectal cancer (TOPIC study).

Tomohiro Nishi1, Yasuo Hamamoto2, Michitaka Nagase3, Tadamichi Denda4, Kensei Yamaguchi5, Kenji Amagai6, Yoshinori Miyata7, Yasuhiro Yamanaka8, Kai Yanai9, Tsutomu Ishikawa10, Yoshifumi Kuroki11, Hirofumi Fujii9.   

Abstract

Little is known about the clinical impact of salvage panitumumab with irinotecan for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. The present study conducted a single-arm, multicenter phase II trial for mCRC with skin toxicity prevention program. The subjects were mCRC patients with wild-type KRAS, who showed resistance to fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Panitumumab was administered at a dose of 6 mg/kg every 2 weeks by intravenous infusion over 60 min, and irinotecan was administered at a dose of 100-180 mg/m2 every 2 weeks by intravenous infusion over 90 min, depending on the preceding treatment dose. To prevent skin toxicities, a moisturizer was applied and oral antibiotics (100 mg minocycline twice daily) were initiated for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was the response rate (RR) determined by independent reviewers. Secondary endpoints were the disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) time, overall survival (OS) time and adverse events. A total of 35 patients were enrolled between October 2010 and March 2012. The median age was 61 years (range, 41-76 years), with 25 male and 10 female patients. The initial irinotecan dose was 150 mg/m2 in 19 patients and 180 mg/m2 in 1 patient. The remaining patients were treated with ≤120 mg/m2. A central review indicated a partial response in 8 patients (22.9%) and stable disease in 6 patients (17.1%), with an RR of 22.9% (95% confidence interval, 12.1-39.0) and a DCR of 40%. The RR of the patients with standard-dose irinotecan (150 or 180 mg/m2) was 30%, although that of low-dose irinotecan (100-120 mg/m2) was 13%. The median PFS time was 2.7 months, and the median OS time was 6.3 months. A grade 3 or above acne-like rash developed in 25.7% of patients. In conclusion, panitumumab and irinotecan as salvage therapy for mCRC KRAS wild-type patients with skin toxicity prevention exhibits limited efficacy. In particular, the effect of low-dose irinotecan with panitumumab appears to be clinically insignificant. Routine use of skin toxicity prevention is currently under evaluation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  irinotecan; metastatic colorectal cancer; panitumumab

Year:  2016        PMID: 27313739      PMCID: PMC4888220          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.4532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  23 in total

1.  Randomized phase III study of panitumumab with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Marc Peeters; Timothy Jay Price; Andrés Cervantes; Alberto F Sobrero; Michel Ducreux; Yevhen Hotko; Thierry André; Emily Chan; Florian Lordick; Cornelis J A Punt; Andrew H Strickland; Gregory Wilson; Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu; Laslo Roman; Eric Van Cutsem; Valentina Tzekova; Simon Collins; Kelly S Oliner; Alan Rong; Jennifer Gansert
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  E Van Cutsem; A Cervantes; B Nordlinger; D Arnold
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Randomized controlled trial on the skin toxicity of panitumumab in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: HGCSG1001 study; J-STEPP.

Authors:  Yoshimitsu Kobayashi; Yoshito Komatsu; Satoshi Yuki; Hiraku Fukushima; Takahide Sasaki; Ichiro Iwanaga; Minoru Uebayashi; Hiroyuki Okuda; Takaya Kusumi; Takuto Miyagishima; Susumu Sogabe; Miki Tateyama; Kazuteru Hatanaka; Yasushi Tsuji; Michio Nakamura; Jun Konno; Fumiyasu Yamamoto; Manabu Onodera; Kazuhiro Iwai; Yuh Sakata; Riichiro Abe; Koji Oba; Naoya Sakamoto
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.404

4.  Skin toxicity evaluation protocol with panitumumab (STEPP), a phase II, open-label, randomized trial evaluating the impact of a pre-Emptive Skin treatment regimen on skin toxicities and quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mario E Lacouture; Edith P Mitchell; Bilal Piperdi; Madhavan V Pillai; Heather Shearer; Nicholas Iannotti; Feng Xu; Mohamed Yassine
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Continuation of bevacizumab after first progression in metastatic colorectal cancer (ML18147): a randomised phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Jaafar Bennouna; Javier Sastre; Dirk Arnold; Pia Österlund; Richard Greil; Eric Van Cutsem; Roger von Moos; Jose Maria Viéitez; Olivier Bouché; Christophe Borg; Claus-Christoph Steffens; Vicente Alonso-Orduña; Christoph Schlichting; Irmarie Reyes-Rivera; Belguendouz Bendahmane; Thierry André; Stefan Kubicka
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Panitumumab combined with irinotecan for patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy: a GERCOR efficacy, tolerance, and translational molecular study.

Authors:  T André; H Blons; M Mabro; B Chibaudel; J-B Bachet; C Tournigand; M Bennamoun; P Artru; S Nguyen; C Ebenezer; N Aissat; A Cayre; F Penault-Llorca; P Laurent-Puig; A de Gramont
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Volker Heinemann; Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal; Thomas Decker; Alexander Kiani; Ursula Vehling-Kaiser; Salah-Eddin Al-Batran; Tobias Heintges; Christian Lerchenmüller; Christoph Kahl; Gernot Seipelt; Frank Kullmann; Martina Stauch; Werner Scheithauer; Jörg Hielscher; Michael Scholz; Sebastian Müller; Hartmut Link; Norbert Niederle; Andreas Rost; Heinz-Gert Höffkes; Markus Moehler; Reinhard U Lindig; Dominik P Modest; Lisa Rossius; Thomas Kirchner; Andreas Jung; Sebastian Stintzing
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Derek J Jonker; Chris J O'Callaghan; Christos S Karapetis; John R Zalcberg; Dongsheng Tu; Heather-Jane Au; Scott R Berry; Marianne Krahn; Timothy Price; R John Simes; Niall C Tebbutt; Guy van Hazel; Rafal Wierzbicki; Christiane Langer; Malcolm J Moore
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Herbert Hurwitz; Louis Fehrenbacher; William Novotny; Thomas Cartwright; John Hainsworth; William Heim; Jordan Berlin; Ari Baron; Susan Griffing; Eric Holmgren; Napoleone Ferrara; Gwen Fyfe; Beth Rogers; Robert Ross; Fairooz Kabbinavar
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-06-03       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Oxaliplatin/capecitabine vs oxaliplatin/infusional 5-FU in advanced colorectal cancer: the MRC COIN trial.

Authors:  A Madi; D Fisher; R H Wilson; R A Adams; A M Meade; S L Kenny; L L Nichols; M T Seymour; H Wasan; R Kaplan; T S Maughan
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  The efficacy and safety of panitumumab plus irrinotecan-based chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qiang Chen; Minjing Cheng; Zhuo Wang; Shipeng Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.889

2.  Management of skin toxicities during panitumumab treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Olivier Bouché; Meher Ben Abdelghani; Jean-Luc Labourey; Simon Triby; René-Jean Bensadoun; Thomas Jouary; Gaétan Des Guetz
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  A phase 2 study of panitumumab with irinotecan as salvage therapy in chemorefractory KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Elena Elez; Carles Pericay; Manuel Valladares-Ayerbes; Inmaculada Bando; Maria Jose Safont; Javier Gallego; Cristina Grávalos; Antonio Arrivi; Alfredo Carrato; Verónica Conde; Maria José Ortiz; Carlos López; Beatriz Alonso; Inmaculada Ruiz de Mena; Eduardo Díaz-Rubio; Josep Tabernero; Enrique Aranda
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 4.  Distinguishing Features of Cetuximab and Panitumumab in Colorectal Cancer and Other Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Jesús García-Foncillas; Yu Sunakawa; Dan Aderka; Zev Wainberg; Philippe Ronga; Pauline Witzler; Sebastian Stintzing
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor Panitumumab in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Sander Ketzer; Kirsten Schimmel; Miriam Koopman; Henk-Jan Guchelaar
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 6.447

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.