Noelle G Moreau1, Amy Winter Bodkin2, Kristie Bjornson3, Amy Hobbs4, Mallary Soileau5, Kay Lahasky6. 1. N.G. Moreau, PT, PhD, Department of Physical Therapy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1900 Gravier St, 7th Floor, New Orleans, LA 70112 (USA). Nmorea@lsuhsc.edu. 2. A.W. Bodkin, PT, PhD, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado. 3. K. Bjornson, PT, PhD, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, Washington. 4. A. Hobbs, PT, DPT, Department of Physical Therapy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center. 5. M. Soileau, PT, DPT, Department of Physical Therapy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center. 6. K. Lahasky, PT, DPT, Department of Physical Therapy, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Children with cerebral palsy (CP) have decreased gait speeds, which can negatively affect their community participation and quality of life. However, evidence for effective rehabilitation interventions to improve gait speed remains unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of interventions for improving gait speed in ambulatory children with CP. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, ERIC, and PEDro were searched from inception through April 2014. STUDY SELECTION: The selected studies were randomized controlled trials or had experimental designs with a comparison group, included a physical therapy or rehabilitation intervention for children with CP, and reported gait speed as an outcome measure. DATA EXTRACTION: Methodological quality was assessed by PEDro scores. Means, standard deviations, and change scores for gait speed were extracted. General study information and dosing parameters (frequency, duration, intensity, and volume) of the intervention were recorded. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-four studies were included. Three categories of interventions were identified: gait training (n=8), resistance training (n=9), and miscellaneous (n=7). Meta-analysis showed that gait training was effective in increasing gait speed, with a standardized effect size of 0.92 (95% confidence interval=0.19, 1.66; P=.01), whereas resistance training was shown to have a negligible effect (effect size=0.06; 95% confidence interval=-0.12, 0.25; P=.51). Effect sizes from negative to large were reported for studies in the miscellaneous category. LIMITATIONS: Gait speed was the only outcome measure analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Gait training was the most effective intervention in improving gait speed for ambulatory children with CP. Strength training, even if properly dosed, was not shown to be effective in improving gait speed. Velocity training, electromyographic biofeedback training, and whole-body vibration were effective in improving gait speed in individual studies and warrant further investigation.
BACKGROUND:Children with cerebral palsy (CP) have decreased gait speeds, which can negatively affect their community participation and quality of life. However, evidence for effective rehabilitation interventions to improve gait speed remains unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of interventions for improving gait speed in ambulatory children with CP. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL, ERIC, and PEDro were searched from inception through April 2014. STUDY SELECTION: The selected studies were randomized controlled trials or had experimental designs with a comparison group, included a physical therapy or rehabilitation intervention for children with CP, and reported gait speed as an outcome measure. DATA EXTRACTION: Methodological quality was assessed by PEDro scores. Means, standard deviations, and change scores for gait speed were extracted. General study information and dosing parameters (frequency, duration, intensity, and volume) of the intervention were recorded. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty-four studies were included. Three categories of interventions were identified: gait training (n=8), resistance training (n=9), and miscellaneous (n=7). Meta-analysis showed that gait training was effective in increasing gait speed, with a standardized effect size of 0.92 (95% confidence interval=0.19, 1.66; P=.01), whereas resistance training was shown to have a negligible effect (effect size=0.06; 95% confidence interval=-0.12, 0.25; P=.51). Effect sizes from negative to large were reported for studies in the miscellaneous category. LIMITATIONS: Gait speed was the only outcome measure analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Gait training was the most effective intervention in improving gait speed for ambulatory children with CP. Strength training, even if properly dosed, was not shown to be effective in improving gait speed. Velocity training, electromyographic biofeedback training, and whole-body vibration were effective in improving gait speed in individual studies and warrant further investigation.
Authors: Marinis Pirpiris; Philip E Gates; James J McCarthy; Jacques D'Astous; Chester Tylkowksi; James O Sanders; Fred J Dorey; Sheryl Ostendorff; Gilda Robles; Christine Caron; Norman Y Otsuka Journal: J Pediatr Orthop Date: 2006 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.324
Authors: Mariusz Drużbicki; Wojciech Rusek; Slawomir Snela; Joanna Dudek; Magdalena Szczepanik; Ewelina Zak; Jacek Durmala; Anna Czernuszenko; Marcin Bonikowski; Grzegorz Sobota Journal: J Rehabil Med Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.912
Authors: Deborah Cristina Gonçalves Luiz Fernani; Maria Tereza Artero Prado; Talita Dias da Silva; Thais Massetti; Luiz Carlos de Abreu; Fernando Henrique Magalhães; Helen Dawes; Carlos Bandeira de Mello Monteiro Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Giulia Spoto; Greta Amore; Luigi Vetri; Giuseppe Quatrosi; Anna Cafeo; Eloisa Gitto; Antonio Gennaro Nicotera; Gabriella Di Rosa Journal: Front Syst Neurosci Date: 2021-06-10