Literature DB >> 27313064

Interim estimates of the effectiveness of influenza vaccination against influenza-associated hospitalization in children in Hong Kong, 2015-16.

Benjamin J Cowling1, Mike Y W Kwan2, Joshua S C Wong2, Shuo Feng1, Chi-Wai Leung2, Eunice L Y Chan3, Kwok-Hung Chan4, Tak-Keung Ng5, Wing-Kin To6, Malik J S Peiris1,7, Susan S Chiu3.   

Abstract

From 1 September 2015 through 31 January 2016, we enrolled 2068 children 6 months to 17 years of age admitted to hospital with a febrile acute respiratory infection in our test-negative study. Information on receipt of 2015-16 northern hemisphere inactivated influenza vaccination was elicited from parents or legal guardians. Using conditional logistic regression adjusting for age and matching on calendar time, we estimated influenza vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization with influenza A or B to be 79.2% (95% confidence interval: 42.0%-92.4%). Annual influenza vaccination should be more widely used in children in Hong Kong.
© 2016 The Authors. Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  effectiveness; hospitalization; influenza; interim; pediatrics; vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27313064      PMCID: PMC5155726          DOI: 10.1111/irv.12399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses        ISSN: 1750-2640            Impact factor:   4.380


Introduction

Influenza viruses circulate each year, causing a considerable burden to public health. Children typically face the greatest risk of influenza virus infection among all age groups in a population,1 and young children have high rates of hospitalizations associated with influenza.2, 3 Influenza vaccination is the most effective measure to prevent infection and recommended by the World Health Organization for many high‐risk groups including young children from 6 to 59 months of age.4 In Hong Kong, a subtropical city on the south coast of China, all children between 6 months and 6 years of age and children 6 years of age or above with an underlying condition associated with an increased risk for influenza complications are recommended to receive influenza vaccination each year.5 The Hong Kong government provides a subsidy for influenza vaccination for children between 6 months and 6 years of age and older children from low‐income families, while children between 6 months and 17 years of age with an underlying medical condition can receive free influenza vaccination.6 It is informative to evaluate influenza vaccination effectiveness (VE) each season to confirm that vaccination is providing adequate protection, to inform risk communication and to provide evidence for vaccination strategies and other public health measures.7 Timely interim, or mid‐season, estimates of influenza VE can be particularly useful to guide resource allocation or implement additional preventive measures if VE is low.8

Methods

Study design

We used the test‐negative study design, which is a type of case–control design, to estimate influenza VE.6, 7, 9, 10, 11 We enrolled children admitted to Queen Mary Hospital 1 of 2 public hospitals with inpatient paediatric services on Hong Kong Island, and the Princess Margaret Hospital and Yan Chai Hospital network which are 2 of the 3 public hospitals in the West Kowloon district with inpatient paediatric services. The same study protocol was used in each hospital. Children 6 months to 17 years of age admitted to the general wards of these hospitals with a febrile acute respiratory infection, defined as fever measured ≥38°C with any respiratory symptom such as cough, runny nose or sore throat, were eligible for inclusion in this study. Children with risk factors for potentially severe respiratory infections such as prematurity or chronic lung disease were not excluded. Nasopharyngeal aspirates were obtained from all patients and tested for influenza A and B virus by direct immunofluorescence assay (for rapid diagnosis) followed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for seasonal influenza A and B viruses using laboratory methods as previously described.6, 11 Influenza vaccination history within 6 months of hospitalization was elicited from the parents or legal guardians of patients using a standardized questionnaire administered by research personnel. Vaccinated children were those who had received influenza vaccination within the 6 months prior to admission in a regimen and dosage appropriate for age and influenza vaccination history according to the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, with the last dose more than 2 weeks before hospitalization.12 Children who should receive 2 doses of influenza vaccination, but only received 1 dose or were vaccinated within 2 weeks of hospitalization were categorized as unvaccinated. The northern hemisphere formulation of trivalent and quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccines were used during our study period. Analysis was performed by R 3.1.1.

Ethical approval

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong and that of the Kowloon West Cluster Research Ethics Committee which waived the need for written consent as viral investigation was a routine diagnostic test carried out as part of routine care, any patient information was delinked from individual patient identification to maintain patient confidentiality and participation by responding to the questionnaire was voluntary and indicative of consent.

Statistical analysis

Following the analytic approach used in previous years,6, 11 we used conditional logistic regression models for influenza status versus vaccination status, adjusting for age and age squared, and matching on calendar time. We matched for calendar time because influenza vaccine coverage changes over time during prolonged periods of influenza activity in Hong Kong.6, 11 VE was estimated as one minus the adjusted conditional odds ratio, multiplied by 100%. Statistical analyses were performed in R version 3.1.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Results

We enrolled 2068 children from 1 September 2015 through 31 January 2016. A small number of children with unknown vaccination history (n = 8) or unknown laboratory results (n = 11) were excluded, leaving data on 2049 children for inclusion in analyses. Of the 2049 children, 59 (2.9%) tested positive for influenza A(H1N1), 15 (0.7%) tested positive for influenza A(H3N2), 49 (2.4%) tested positive for influenza B and the remainder tested negative for influenza. The characteristics of enrolled patients are shown in Table 1. Patients testing negative for influenza were enrolled at fairly constant rates throughout the period, while most patients testing positive for influenza were enrolled in January 2016, with the early part of the influenza season being dominated by A(H1N1) (Fig. 1).
Table 1

Comparison of cases testing positive for influenza A and B and test‐negative cases in Hong Kong, 2015–16

CharacteristicTest‐positive for influenza A or B(n = 123)N (%)Test‐negative for influenza A and B(n = 1926) N (%) P‐valuea
Age group
6 mo–2 y40 (32.5%)980 (50.9%)<0.01
3–5 y39 (31.7%)570 (29.6%)
6–17 y44 (35.8%)376 (19.5%)
Male77 (62.6%)1068 (55.5%)0.15
Receipt of TIV/QIVb in the preceding 6 mo4/123 (3.3%)279/1926 (14.5%)<0.01
Breakdown of overall vaccination coverage by age
6 mo–2 y0/40 (0%)87/980 (8.9%)0.09
3–5 y1/39 (2.6%)135/570 (23.7%)<0.01
6–17 y3/44 (6.8%)57/346 (15.2%)0.21
Breakdown of vaccines received by vaccine type:
Vaccine type: TIVb 3/4 (75.0%)127/279 (45.5%)0.34
Vaccine type: QIVb 0/4 (0%)65/279 (23.3%)0.58
Vaccine type: unknown1/4 (25.0%)87/279 (31.2%)1.00

P‐values estimated by chi‐squared tests and Fisher's exact test.

TIV, trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine, QIV, quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine.

Figure 1

Enrolment of children from 1 September 2015 through 31 January 2016 in Hong Kong, classified by laboratory testing result for influenza by type/subtype

Comparison of cases testing positive for influenza A and B and test‐negative cases in Hong Kong, 2015–16 P‐values estimated by chi‐squared tests and Fisher's exact test. TIV, trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine, QIV, quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine. Enrolment of children from 1 September 2015 through 31 January 2016 in Hong Kong, classified by laboratory testing result for influenza by type/subtype We estimated influenza VE to be 79.0% (95% confidence interval, CI: 42.0, 92.4) against any influenza, 82.8% (95% CI: 28.4, 95.9) against influenza A and 73.0% (95% CI: −12.8, 93.5) against influenza B among children aged 6 months to 17 years. Age‐specific estimates of VE overall and by influenza type are shown in Fig. 2. We did not have sufficient data to estimate VE against influenza A subtypes.
Figure 2

Interim estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness against influenza viruses overall and by influenza type and age group in Hong Kong, 2015–16. Vaccination effectiveness estimates of 100% with wide confidence intervals are from subgroups in which there were no vaccinated children in the test‐positive group and are shown in grey

Interim estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness against influenza viruses overall and by influenza type and age group in Hong Kong, 2015–16. Vaccination effectiveness estimates of 100% with wide confidence intervals are from subgroups in which there were no vaccinated children in the test‐positive group and are shown in grey

Discussion

Influenza vaccination coverage was only 14% in the hospitalized children despite government subsidies for younger children and children at higher risk of complicated infection. Our preliminary estimates of influenza VE for the 2015–16 northern hemisphere influenza vaccine were at the high end of VE against influenza hospitalization compared to estimates in the same age group from previous years in Hong Kong6, 11: VE against overall influenza A or B hospitalization was 61.7% (95% CI: 43.0, 74.2) in 2009–2013 and against influenza B hospitalization was 47.6% (95% CI: 10.0, 69.4) in 2009–2014.. Studies conducted in outpatient settings for all ages reported modest to high early/interim VE estimates: Canada recently reported VE of 64% (95% CI: 44–77) against influenza A(H1N1)13; the I‐MOVE study reported VE of 46.3% (4.9–69.7%) against any influenza14; the United States reported an interim estimate of VE of 59%15; and the United Kingdom reported an interim estimate of 41.5% against any influenza.16 There are some limitations of our study. We estimated VE against hospitalization, and this will differ from VE against infection or medically attended infection if vaccination modifies disease severity.10 In a recent review, estimates of VE against hospitalization were very similar to estimates of VE against medically attended illness, for studies conducted in the same populations, years and age groups.17 Influenza vaccination history of 6 months was self‐reported, and misclassification of vaccination status may have biased estimates of VE.18 Information was not available on potential confounders such as underlying medical conditions. The sample size was large enough to confirm statistically significant overall VE, but not sufficient to provide precise estimates of VE in some age groups. Finally, our interim estimates of VE may differ from the future end‐of‐season estimate, although usually interim estimates are quite similar to final end‐of‐season estimates in test‐negative studies.8, 19, 20 Final estimates for 2015–16 in Hong Kong will be available around the end of 2016. In conclusion, we documented that influenza vaccination was associated with good protection against influenza‐associated hospitalization in children 6 months to 17 years in Hong Kong in this interim analysis. Healthcare providers and parents should be encouraged to increase influenza vaccination coverage in children in Hong Kong.

Potential Conflict of Interests

BJC has received research funding from MedImmune Inc and Sanofi Pasteur, and consulted for Crucell NV. JSMP has received research funding from Crucell NV and serves as an ad hoc consultant for GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi. The authors report no other potential conflict of interests.

Author Contributions

SSC conceived the study. MYWK, JSCW and ELYC collected data. BJC, SF and ELYC analysed the data. All authors interpreted the data. BJC wrote the first draft and all authors contributed to review and revision and have seen and approved the final version.
  18 in total

1.  Influenza vaccine effectiveness by test-negative design - Comparison of inpatient and outpatient settings.

Authors:  Shuo Feng; Benjamin J Cowling; Sheena G Sullivan
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 2.  Concordance of interim and final estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness: a systematic review.

Authors:  Vivian K Leung; Benjamin J Cowling; Shuo Feng; Sheena G Sullivan
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2016-04-21

3.  Interim estimates of 2015/16 vaccine effectiveness against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, Canada, February 2016.

Authors:  Catharine Chambers; Danuta M Skowronski; Suzana Sabaiduc; Anne Luise Winter; James A Dickinson; Gaston De Serres; Jonathan B Gubbay; Steven J Drews; Christine Martineau; Alireza Eshaghi; Mel Krajden; Nathalie Bastien; Yan Li
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2016

4.  Influenza vaccine effectiveness in Wisconsin during the 2007-08 season: comparison of interim and final results.

Authors:  Edward A Belongia; Burney A Kieke; James G Donahue; Laura A Coleman; Stephanie A Irving; Jennifer K Meece; Mary Vandermause; Stephen Lindstrom; Paul Gargiullo; David K Shay
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Tecumseh study of illness. XIII. Influenza infection and disease, 1976-1981.

Authors:  A S Monto; J S Koopman; I M Longini
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Interim influenza vaccine effectiveness: A good proxy for final estimates in Spain in the seasons 2010-2014.

Authors:  Silvia Jiménez-Jorge; Francisco Pozo; Amparo Larrauri
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Hospitalizations associated with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in the United States, 1993-2008.

Authors:  Hong Zhou; William W Thompson; Cecile G Viboud; Corinne M Ringholz; Po-Yung Cheng; Claudia Steiner; Glen R Abedi; Larry J Anderson; Lynnette Brammer; David K Shay
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  The test-negative design for estimating influenza vaccine effectiveness.

Authors:  Michael L Jackson; Jennifer C Nelson
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Estimation of influenza vaccine effectiveness from routine surveillance data.

Authors:  Heath Kelly; Kylie Carville; Kristina Grant; Peter Jacoby; Thomas Tran; Ian Barr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The case test-negative design for studies of the effectiveness of influenza vaccine in inpatient settings.

Authors:  Ivo M Foppa; Jill M Ferdinands; Sandra S Chaves; Michael J Haber; Sue B Reynolds; Brendan Flannery; Alicia M Fry
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effectiveness of influenza vaccination on influenza-associated hospitalisations over time among children in Hong Kong: a test-negative case-control study.

Authors:  Shuo Feng; Susan S Chiu; Eunice L Y Chan; Mike Y W Kwan; Joshua S C Wong; Chi-Wai Leung; Yiu Chung Lau; Sheena G Sullivan; J S Malik Peiris; Benjamin J Cowling
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 30.700

2.  Effectiveness of Partial and Full Influenza Vaccination Among Children Aged <9 Years in Hong Kong, 2011-2019.

Authors:  Huiying Chua; Susan S Chiu; Eunice L Y Chan; Shuo Feng; Mike Y W Kwan; Joshua S C Wong; J S Malik Peiris; Benjamin J Cowling
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  The Use of Test-negative Controls to Monitor Vaccine Effectiveness: A Systematic Review of Methodology.

Authors:  Huiying Chua; Shuo Feng; Joseph A Lewnard; Sheena G Sullivan; Christopher C Blyth; Marc Lipsitch; Benjamin J Cowling
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Against Influenza A(H3N2) Hospitalizations in Children in Hong Kong in a Prolonged Season, 2016/2017.

Authors:  Susan S Chiu; Mike Y W Kwan; Shuo Feng; Joshua S C Wong; Chi-Wai Leung; Eunice L Y Chan; Kwok-Hung Chan; Tak-Keung Ng; Wing-Kin To; Benjamin J Cowling; J S Malik Peiris
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  School-based surveillance for influenza vaccine effectiveness during 2014-2015 seasons in Hong Kong.

Authors:  Ting F Leung; Renee W Y Chan; Angela Kwok; Wendy C S Ho; Mars K P Tao; Kam L Hon; Frankie W T Cheng; Albert M Li; Paul K S Chan
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.380

6.  Interim estimate of influenza vaccine effectiveness in hospitalised children, Hong Kong, 2017/18.

Authors:  Susan S Chiu; Mike Y W Kwan; Shuo Feng; Joshua S C Wong; Chi-Wai Leung; Eunice L Y Chan; J S Malik Peiris; Benjamin J Cowling
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2018-02

7.  Effectiveness of the quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in Japan during the 2015-2016 season: A test-negative case-control study comparing the results by real time PCR, virus isolation.

Authors:  Irina Chon; Reiko Saito; Akinobu Hibino; Ren Yagami; Clyde Dapat; Takashi Odagiri; Hiroki Kondo; Isamu Sato; Shinji Kimura; Takashi Kawashima; Naoki Kodo; Hironori Masaki; Norichika Asoh; Yoshiko Tsuchihashi; Hassan Zaraket; Yugo Shobugawa
Journal:  Vaccine X       Date:  2019-01-29

Review 8.  Dynamic Propagation and Impact of Pandemic Influenza A (2009 H1N1) in Children: A Detailed Review.

Authors:  Yashwant Kumar Ratre; Naveen Kumar Vishvakarma; L V K S Bhaskar; Henu Kumar Verma
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.343

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.