Literature DB >> 27312898

Bioassays with terrestrial and aquatic species as monitoring tools of hydrocarbon degradation.

Jaume Bori1, Bettina Vallès2, Lina Ortega3, Maria Carme Riva2.   

Abstract

In this study chemical analyses and ecotoxicity tests were applied for the assessment of a heavily hydrocarbon-contaminated soil prior and after the application of a remediation procedure that consisted in the stimulation of soil autochthonous populations of hydrocarbon degraders in static-ventilated biopiles. Terrestrial bioassays were applied in mixtures of test soils and artificial control soil and studied the survival and reproduction of Eisenia fetida and the avoidance response of E. fetida and Folsomia candida. Effects on aquatic organisms were studied by means of acute tests with Vibrio fischeri, Raphidocelis subcapitata, and Daphnia magna performed on aqueous elutriates from test soils. The bioremediation procedure led to a significant reduction in the concentration of hydrocarbons (from 34264 to 3074 mg kg(-1), i.e., 91 % decrease) and toxicity although bioassays were not able to report a percentage decrease of toxicity as high as the percentage reduction. Sublethal tests proved the most sensitive terrestrial bioassays and avoidance tests with earthworms and springtails showed potential as monitoring tools of hydrocarbon remediation due to their high sensitivity and short duration. The concentrations of hydrocarbons in water extracts from test soils were 130 and 100 μg L(-1) before and after remediation, respectively. Similarly to terrestrial tests, most aquatic bioassays detected a significant reduction in toxicity, which was almost negligible at the end of the treatment. D. magna survival was the most affected by soil elutriates although toxicity to the crustacean was associated to the salinity of the samples rather than to the concentration of hydrocarbons. Ecotoxicity tests with aqueous soil elutriates proved less relevant in the assessment of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils due to the low hydrosolubility of hydrocarbons and the influence of the physicochemical parameters of the aquatic medium.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aqueous extracts; Ecotoxicology; Hydrocarbon degradation; Remediation; Soil contamination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27312898     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-7097-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  19 in total

1.  The use of acute and chronic bioassays to determine the ecological risk and bioremediation efficiency of oil-polluted soils.

Authors:  C A van Gestel; J J van der Waarde; J G Derksen; E E van der Hoek; M F Veul; S Bouwens; B Rusch; R Kronenburg; G N Stokman
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 2.  Recommendations of the 3rd International Workshop on Earthworm Ecotoxicology, Aarhus, Denmark, August 2001.

Authors:  C A M Van Gestel; Jason M Weeks
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.291

3.  Toxicity assessment for petroleum-contaminated soil using terrestrial invertebrates and plant bioassays.

Authors:  Olfa Hentati; Radhia Lachhab; Mariem Ayadi; Mohamed Ksibi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  An Alternative Approach to Assess the Habitat Selection of Folsomia candida in Contaminated Soils.

Authors:  Jaume Bori; Maria Carme Riva
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  Comparing median lethal concentration values using confidence interval overlap or ratio tests.

Authors:  Matthew W Wheeler; Robert M Park; A John Bailer
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 6.  Bioremediation approaches for organic pollutants: a critical perspective.

Authors:  Mallavarapu Megharaj; Balasubramanian Ramakrishnan; Kadiyala Venkateswarlu; Nambrattil Sethunathan; Ravi Naidu
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 9.621

7.  Ecotoxicological monitoring of remediation in a coke oven soil.

Authors:  E Mendonça; A Picado
Journal:  Environ Toxicol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.119

8.  Geochemistry and environmental threats of soils surrounding an abandoned mercury mine.

Authors:  Jaume Bori; Bettina Vallès; Andrés Navarro; Maria Carme Riva
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Ecotoxicity monitoring of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil during bioremediation: a case study.

Authors:  Tomás Hubálek; Simona Vosáhlová; Vít Matejů; Nora Kovácová; Cenek Novotný
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Influence of the bioaccessible fraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on the ecotoxicity of historically contaminated soils.

Authors:  Monika Čvančarová; Zdena Křesinová; Tomáš Cajthaml
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 10.588

View more
  1 in total

1.  Soil and Freshwater Bioassays to Assess Ecotoxicological Impact on Soils Affected by Mining Activities in the Iberian Pyrite Belt.

Authors:  Óscar Andreu-Sánchez; Mari Luz García-Lorenzo; José María Esbrí; Ramón Sánchez-Donoso; Mario Iglesias-Martínez; Xabier Arroyo; Elena Crespo-Feo; Nuria Ruiz-Costa; Luis Roca-Pérez; Pedro Castiñeiras
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-06-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.