Literature DB >> 27312712

Antibiotic use during pregnancy: how bad is it?

Amir A Kuperman1,2, Omry Koren3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our microbial companions (the "microbiota") are extremely important for the preservation of human health. Although changes in bacterial communities (dysbiosis) are commonly associated with disease, such changes have also been described in healthy pregnancies, where the microbiome plays an essential role in maternal and child health outcomes, including normal immune and metabolic function in later life. Nevertheless, this new understanding of the importance of the microbiome has not yet influenced contemporary clinical practice regarding antibiotic use during pregnancy. DISCUSSION: Antibiotic treatment during pregnancy is widespread in Western countries, and accounts for 80 % of prescribed medications in pregnancy. However, antibiotic treatment, while at times lifesaving, can also have detrimental consequences. A single course of antibiotics perturbs bacterial communities, with evidence that the microbial ecosystem does not return completely to baseline following treatment. Antibiotics in pregnancy should be used only when indicated, choosing those with the narrowest range possible. Bacteria are essential for normal human development and, while antibiotic treatment during pregnancy has an important role in controlling and preventing infections, it may have undesired effects regarding the maternal and fetoplacental microbiomes. We expect that microbiota manipulation in pregnancy, through the use of probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation, will be the subject of increasing clinical interest.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amniotic fluid; Antibiotics; Fetus; Gut; Immune system; Microbiome; Placenta; Pregnancy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27312712      PMCID: PMC4911692          DOI: 10.1186/s12916-016-0636-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med        ISSN: 1741-7015            Impact factor:   8.775


Background

The human body is home to a variety of microorganisms, termed the microbiota, consisting of up to 100 trillion bacterial cells, most of which reside in the gut. Large sequencing efforts, such as the Human Microbiome Project, have characterized the microbiota of the major sites (gut, mouth, skin, airways, and vagina) of the human body in healthy individuals and demonstrated that different body sites harbor diverse populations of microbes [1]. Our microbial companions are extremely important for the preservation of human health, and a growing number of studies describe how changes in these bacterial communities are linked to disease states such as obesity [2], diabetes [3], atherosclerosis [4], and autoimmune disorders [5], among others. These shifts in community structure are termed dysbiosis. Although dysbiosis is commonly associated with disease, it has also been described in healthy pregnancies in which there is a bidirectional relationship between pregnancy and the microbiome, whereby pregnancy affects the composition of the microbiome and the microbiome plays a role in maternal and child health outcomes [4]. These shifts in microbial composition occur in several sites in the body of the pregnant woman.

Maternal gut and vaginal microbiome changes during normal pregnancy and pregnancy complications

Pregnancy is characterized by profound hormonal, immunological, and metabolic changes aimed at supporting the growth of the fetoplacental unit [6]. Interestingly, a healthy pregnancy also induces dramatic changes in the maternal gut microbiota over the course of gestation, with a great expansion of diversity between individuals, an overall increase in Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria, and reduced diversity within each microbiome. Similarly, the vaginal microbiome in pregnancy is different from that of non-pregnant women, with lesser diversity and richness, and with a dominance of Lactobacillus species, Clostridiales, Bacteroidales, and Actinomycetales [7]. When transferred to germ-free mice, third trimester microbiota induced greater adiposity and low-grade inflammation compared to first trimester microbiota [4], and it was recently suggested that alteration of the gut microbiota during pregnancy may also induce complications of pregnancy such as excessive maternal weight gain [8]. Maternal pregnancy complications significantly influence the bacterial composition and diversity of the stool microbiota of premature infants, with these changes persisting during the first year after birth [9]. Antibiotic usage during pregnancy undoubtedly affects the bacterial environment of the mother and of the fetus.

Bacteria of the fetoplacental unit – more fact than fiction?

We are rapidly progressing towards understanding the role of bacteria in novel target organs traditionally considered “sterile”, including the central nervous system [10], blood [11], the lower airways [12], the sub-epidermis [13], and the fetoplacental unit [14]. ‘The fetus lies in a sterile environment’ declared the French pediatrician Henry Tissier of the Pasteur Institute in 1900 [15]; since then, the placenta was traditionally believed to form a sterile barrier between the colonized maternal urogenital tract and the fetus. However, recent studies have challenged this assumption. The first demonstration of bacteria in the placenta in the modern scientific literature was published in 1982 by Kovalovszki et al. [16]. Subsequent publications have described the placental microbiome, using culture-dependent and -independent methods, and suggested its relative similarity to the oral microbiome, with bacteria such as Prevotella tannerae and Neisseria being present in the placenta [14] (Fig. 1). Specific components of the placental microbiome have been linked to particular pregnancy complications (Table 1, Fig. 2). Several mechanisms of amniotic fluid colonization have been proposed, including the translocation of vaginal bacteria [17] via the bloodstream or from the oral cavity [18]. Other possible routes include hematogenous spread or bacterial migration from the lower gastrointestinal tract to the lower genitourinary tract (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

The fetoplacental microbiome of healthy pregnancy and its origins. Bacteria and their genes have been isolated from human placentas, amniotic fluid, fetal membranes, and fetal gastrointestinal tract in healthy, normal pregnancies. These bacteria have three main routes of entry: the oro-fetoplacental route, the gastrointestinal-fetoplacental route, and the genitourinary-fetoplacental route. Examples of specific bacteria are indicated

Table 1

Summary of studies providing evidence for bacteria in the human fetoplacental unit in both complicated and uncomplicated pregnancies (✓marks published evidence)

Pregnancy stateMethodPlacentaAmniotic fluidFetal membranesReference
Normal pregnancyMicroscopy[26, 3740]
Bacterial cultures[16, 37, 39, 4150]
Culture independent methods[14, 26, 37, 38, 41, 43, 45, 5062]
Premature rupture of membranes and preterm laborMicroscopy[41, 61]
Bacterial cultures[16, 20, 39, 44, 50, 52, 57, 6369]
Culture independent methods[14, 16, 19, 20, 39, 42, 46, 50, 52, 53, 61, 70]
Intrauterine growth restrictionBacterial cultures[71]
Culture independent methods[45, 72]
Pre-eclampsiaBacterial cultures[46, 72, 73]
Culture independent methods[49, 51, 58, 62, 72, 73]
Fig. 2

The fetoplacental microbiome in various pregnancy complications involving the placenta. Examples of specific disease-associated species are shown. a Bacteria are found in the placenta (Streptococcus avermitilis), fetal membranes (Fusobacterium nucleatum), and amniotic fluid (Ureaplasma parvum) in cases of premature labor and premature rupture of membranes. b Bacteria are present in amniotic fluid (Mycoplasma hominis) in small-for-gestational-age (intrauterine growth restriction) fetuses. c Bacteria are present in the placenta (Gardnerella vaginalis) and amniotic fluid (Sneathia/Leptotrichia spp) in cases of preeclampsia. A pregnant woman is illustrated, exhibiting headache, edema, and petechia

The fetoplacental microbiome of healthy pregnancy and its origins. Bacteria and their genes have been isolated from human placentas, amniotic fluid, fetal membranes, and fetal gastrointestinal tract in healthy, normal pregnancies. These bacteria have three main routes of entry: the oro-fetoplacental route, the gastrointestinal-fetoplacental route, and the genitourinary-fetoplacental route. Examples of specific bacteria are indicated Summary of studies providing evidence for bacteria in the human fetoplacental unit in both complicated and uncomplicated pregnancies (✓marks published evidence) The fetoplacental microbiome in various pregnancy complications involving the placenta. Examples of specific disease-associated species are shown. a Bacteria are found in the placenta (Streptococcus avermitilis), fetal membranes (Fusobacterium nucleatum), and amniotic fluid (Ureaplasma parvum) in cases of premature labor and premature rupture of membranes. b Bacteria are present in amniotic fluid (Mycoplasma hominis) in small-for-gestational-age (intrauterine growth restriction) fetuses. c Bacteria are present in the placenta (Gardnerella vaginalis) and amniotic fluid (Sneathia/Leptotrichia spp) in cases of preeclampsia. A pregnant woman is illustrated, exhibiting headache, edema, and petechia The fetal membranes consist of the amniotic membrane, which contains the amniotic fluid, and the chorion, which is in proximity with the decidua parietalis. It has been shown that certain bacteria may be present in fetal membranes without leading to an inflammatory response [16]; Galask et al. [19] demonstrated that bacteria can traverse intact fetal membranes. Other bacteria resident in the fetal membranes are thought to play a role in amniotic inflammation, and thus in the initiation of labor [20]. Some of the studies described above demonstrated very low levels of bacterial DNA in the fetoplacental components. As detection methods become more sensitive, even more rigorous precautions must be taken against contamination when screening for bacterial colonization [21]. Nevertheless, despite the possibility of sample contamination, the physiological and beneficial presence of bacteria in the placenta is gaining widespread acceptance.

Antibiotic use in pregnancy - an opinion

Perhaps the most clinically relevant aspect of the pregnancy microbiome is antibiotic treatment during pregnancy. Antibiotics account for 80 % of all prescribed medication in pregnancy [22], yet surprisingly, few published human studies have carefully evaluated the direct effects of antibiotics during pregnancy on either the maternal or fetal microbiome, or evaluated long-term sequelae of such antibiotic use. Thus, there may be a reason for caution in prescribing antibiotics during pregnancy. In pregnant NOD mice, antibiotic treatment caused alteration of gut microbiota and immunological changes in the intestine of the offspring [23]. In pregnant women, it was demonstrated that antibiotic administration during pregnancy leads to alterations in the vaginal microbiome prior to birth, with long-term effects on the early microbial colonization of the newborn [24] and an association with childhood obesity [25]. There are several components to this issue. Antibiotic treatment of infectious diseases is one of the greatest advances of modern medicine. Accordingly, antibiotics are widely prescribed during pregnancy as the most important modality for treating and preventing infections. It is estimated that one in five pregnant women in Europe is prescribed at least one antibiotic during pregnancy; in the United States, the rate is double [26]. Nevertheless, prescription of antibiotics should be carefully considered on an individual basis, weighing its benefits versus drawbacks for both the fetus and the mother. It has been shown that administration of certain antibiotics is linked to a significantly higher rate of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis, although antibiotic treatment is also associated with a reduced rate of lung complications and major cerebral abnormalities, relative to non-antibiotic treated controls [27]. A more recent study published in 2008 demonstrated that the prescription of antibiotics for women in spontaneous preterm labor with intact membranes was associated with an increased risk of cerebral palsy and functional impairment among their children at 7 years of age [28]. As discussed above, the healthy microbiome is important for maintaining a normal pregnancy and, therefore, it has been suggested that we may be using too many antibiotics during pregnancy [29]. A large systematic review concluded that antibiotics during the second and third trimester do not reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes and morbidity [30]. In addition, even a short course of antibiotics perturbs bacterial communities in human hosts [30]. In one study, it was shown that, within 30 days following cessation of antibiotic treatment, fecal microbiota reached an average similarity of 88 % to baseline, with the level rising to 89 % within 60 days [31]; however, the microbiota did not completely return to baseline over the timescale studied. Thus, antibiotics cause an immediate perturbation of the ecosystem, followed by incomplete recovery of the gut microbiome. The response to a given antibiotic is individualized, and may be influenced by prior exposure to the same drug. Accordingly, even a short course of antibiotics may sometimes have a long lasting residual effect on the microbiome, with possible metabolic or immune consequences. The use of antibiotics during pregnancy has also been associated with increased risk of asthma in early childhood [32-34], increased risk of childhood epilepsy, and increased risk of childhood obesity [25]. Of course, the argument could be made that the primary maternal infection was the cause for the increased risk of these conditions, rather than the treatment itself. Nevertheless, we suggest that antibiotics in pregnancy may affect the bacterial ecosystem of the mother as well as that of the fetus, and therefore that their use should be carefully considered based on what is known, and what remains unknown, regarding their effects. Recent studies have demonstrated that priming of the immune system and microbiota-driven immune changes begin in utero and are not – as traditionally believed – induced postnatally by the newborn’s microbiota [35]. These new insights suggest that the maternal microbiota during pregnancy actually drives early postnatal innate immune development [36]. It is becoming clearer that the maternal microbiota, in concert with maternal antibodies, are important in preparing the fetus for host-microbial symbiosis later in life. The mechanisms of this phenomenon are now being explored and involve microbial molecular transfer (without any live bacteria). In addition, maternal antibodies have a dual effect, promoting pathogen neutralization whilst simultaneously enhancing microbial molecular transfer. Gomez de Aguero et al. [36] recently showed that pups of mothers transiently colonized during pregnancy have a greater capacity to avoid inflammation in response to bacterial molecules and penetration of intestinal microbes. Thus, the maternal microbiota plays a role in shaping the postnatal immune system and interferences with maternal microbiota during pregnancy may hinder the natural process of prenatal immune priming. We believe that the issue of antibiotics during pregnancy is one of the greatest challenges of human microbiome research and certainly deserves increased focus in the form of observational and interventional studies to unravel the role of these drugs in human development.

Summary and future directions

One may argue for the importance of antibiotics during pregnancy to prevent or treat bacterial infections. Indeed, antibiotics have an important role in improving and promoting health in pregnant women. Nevertheless, as with other therapeutic modalities, overuse may be counter-productive. The realization that antibiotic use in pregnancy may interfere with the delicate balance between the pregnant woman’s microbiota, which is important for normal fetal development, may gradually decrease the enormous, and possibly excessive, utilization of these drugs during pregnancy. In case of proven maternal infection, narrow spectrum antibiotics should be preferred due to their less extensive effects on the microbiome, taking into account the association of prenatal antibiotics with increased risk of childhood asthma, epilepsy, and obesity. Future studies should focus on maternal microbiome manipulations such as personalized probiotics and fecal microbiota transplantation, and their effect on pregnancy outcome, as well as on the use of specific microbial profiling for diagnosis of pregnancy complications and prediction of long-term outcomes of newborn and maternal health.
  72 in total

1.  Resilience of the dominant human fecal microbiota upon short-course antibiotic challenge.

Authors:  M F De La Cochetière; T Durand; P Lepage; A Bourreille; J P Galmiche; J Doré
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Streptococcus agalactiae in pregnancies complicated by preterm prelabor rupture of membranes.

Authors:  Ivana Musilova; Lenka Pliskova; Radka Kutova; Bo Jacobsson; Pavla Paterova; Marian Kacerovsky
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2015-04-29

Review 3.  Host-microorganism interactions in lung diseases.

Authors:  Benjamin J Marsland; Eva S Gollwitzer
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 53.106

4.  Transmission of an uncultivated Bergeyella strain from the oral cavity to amniotic fluid in a case of preterm birth.

Authors:  Yiping W Han; Akihiko Ikegami; Nabil F Bissada; Melissa Herbst; Raymond W Redline; Graham G Ashmead
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Sex differences in the gut microbiome drive hormone-dependent regulation of autoimmunity.

Authors:  Janet G M Markle; Daniel N Frank; Steven Mortin-Toth; Charles E Robertson; Leah M Feazel; Ulrike Rolle-Kampczyk; Martin von Bergen; Kathy D McCoy; Andrew J Macpherson; Jayne S Danska
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A rapid matrix metalloproteinase-8 bedside test for the detection of intraamniotic inflammation in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes.

Authors:  Kun Woo Kim; Roberto Romero; Hyun Soo Park; Chan-Wook Park; Soon-Sup Shim; Jong Kwan Jun; Bo Hyun Yoon
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  A sonographic short cervix as the only clinical manifestation of intra-amniotic infection.

Authors:  Sonia Hassan; Roberto Romero; Israel Hendler; Ricardo Gomez; Nahla Khalek; Jimmy Espinoza; Jyh Kae Nien; Stanley M Berry; Emmanuel Bujold; Natalia Camacho; Yoram Sorokin
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.901

8.  Isolation of aerobic bacteria from the placenta.

Authors:  L Kovalovszki; Z Villányi; I Pataki; I Veszelowvsky; Z B Nagy
Journal:  Acta Paediatr Acad Sci Hung       Date:  1982

Review 9.  Prophylactic antibiotics for inhibiting preterm labour with intact membranes.

Authors:  Vicki Flenady; Glenda Hawley; Owen M Stock; Sara Kenyon; Nadia Badawi
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-05

10.  A metagenomic approach to characterization of the vaginal microbiome signature in pregnancy.

Authors:  Kjersti Aagaard; Kevin Riehle; Jun Ma; Nicola Segata; Toni-Ann Mistretta; Cristian Coarfa; Sabeen Raza; Sean Rosenbaum; Ignatia Van den Veyver; Aleksandar Milosavljevic; Dirk Gevers; Curtis Huttenhower; Joseph Petrosino; James Versalovic
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Inflammation in Mental Disorders: Is the Microbiota the Missing Link?

Authors:  Sophie Ouabbou; Ying He; Keith Butler; Ming Tsuang
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 2.  The Central Nervous System and the Gut Microbiome.

Authors:  Gil Sharon; Timothy R Sampson; Daniel H Geschwind; Sarkis K Mazmanian
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  The Canadian Preterm Birth Network: a study protocol for improving outcomes for preterm infants and their families.

Authors:  Prakesh S Shah; Sarah D McDonald; Jon Barrett; Anne Synnes; Kate Robson; Jonathan Foster; Jean-Charles Pasquier; K S Joseph; Bruno Piedboeuf; Thierry Lacaze-Masmonteil; Karel O'Brien; Sandesh Shivananda; Nils Chaillet; Petros Pechlivanoglou
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-01-18

Review 4.  Early life interaction between the microbiota and the enteric nervous system.

Authors:  Jaime P P Foong; Lin Y Hung; Sabrina Poon; Tor C Savidge; Joel C Bornstein
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.052

5.  Antibiotic Use Without Indication During Delivery Hospitalizations in the United States.

Authors:  Maria Andrikopoulou; Yongmei Huang; Cassandra R Duffy; Conrad N Stern-Ascher; Jason D Wright; Dena Goffman; Mary E DʼAlton; Alexander M Friedman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Impacts of ceftriaxone exposure during pregnancy on maternal gut and placental microbiota and its influence on maternal and offspring immunity in mice.

Authors:  Ruyue Cheng; Jiawen Guo; Yujie Zhang; Guo Cheng; Wei Qian; ChaoMin Wan; Ming Li; Francesco Marotta; Xi Shen; Fang He
Journal:  Exp Anim       Date:  2020-12-03

Review 7.  A Dormant Microbial Component in the Development of Preeclampsia.

Authors:  Douglas B Kell; Louise C Kenny
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2016-11-29

8.  Antibiotic use amongst pregnant women in a public hospital in KwaZulu-Natal.

Authors:  Sasha Naidoo; Varsha Bangalee; Frasia Oosthuizen
Journal:  Health SA       Date:  2021-05-31

9.  Antibiotic Prescriptions among China Ambulatory Care Visits of Pregnant Women: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Houyu Zhao; Mei Zhang; Jiaming Bian; Siyan Zhan
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19

10.  Developmental intestinal microbiome alterations in canine fading puppy syndrome: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Smadar Tal; Evgenii Tikhonov; Omry Koren; Sharon Kuzi; Itamar Aroch; Lior Hefetz; Sondra Turjeman
Journal:  NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 7.290

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.