Literature DB >> 31503161

Antibiotic Use Without Indication During Delivery Hospitalizations in the United States.

Maria Andrikopoulou1, Yongmei Huang, Cassandra R Duffy, Conrad N Stern-Ascher, Jason D Wright, Dena Goffman, Mary E DʼAlton, Alexander M Friedman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze trends in unindicated antibiotic use during vaginal delivery hospitalization.
METHODS: This study used an administrative database to analyze antibiotic use during delivery hospitalizations from January 2006 to March 2015. Women were classified by mode of delivery and whether they had an evidence-based indication for antibiotics. Indications for antibiotics included preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM), cesarean delivery, group B streptococcus (GBS) colonization, chorioamnionitis, endometritis, urinary tract infections, and other infections. The Cochran-Armitage test was used to assess trends of antibiotic administration. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses for antibiotic receipt including demographic, hospital, and obstetric and medical factors were performed with unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs as measures of association.
RESULTS: A total of 5,536,756 delivery hospitalizations, including 2,872,286 vaginal deliveries without an indication for antibiotics, were analyzed. The most common indication for antibiotics was cesarean delivery (33.6% of the entire cohort), followed by GBS colonization (15.8%), chorioamnionitis (1.7%), preterm PROM (1.6%), endometritis (1.2%), urinary tract infections (0.6%), and other infections (total less than 0.5%). The proportion of women receiving unindicated antibiotics decreased 44.4%, from 38.1% in 2006 to 21.2% in 2015. Adjusted risk for receipt of unindicated antibiotics was lower in 2015 vs 2006 (adjusted RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.55-0.57).
CONCLUSION: Use of antibiotics during vaginal delivery hospitalizations without an indication for antibiotic use declined significantly based on an analysis of a large administrative data set.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31503161      PMCID: PMC6768706          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  30 in total

1.  Antibiotic resistance patterns of group B streptococci in late third-trimester rectovaginal cultures.

Authors:  M L Bland; S T Vermillion; D E Soper; M Austin
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Hazards of widespread use of erythromycin for preterm prelabour rupture of membranes.

Authors:  Susern Tan; R Holliman; A R Bedford Russell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease--revised guidelines from CDC, 2010.

Authors:  Jennifer R Verani; Lesley McGee; Stephanie J Schrag
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2010-11-19

4.  An enhanced method for identifying obstetric deliveries: implications for estimating maternal morbidity.

Authors:  Elena V Kuklina; Maura K Whiteman; Susan D Hillis; Denise J Jamieson; Susan F Meikle; Samuel F Posner; Polly A Marchbanks
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-08-10

5.  Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and the association with postoperative infections.

Authors:  Jonah J Stulberg; Conor P Delaney; Duncan V Neuhauser; David C Aron; Pingfu Fu; Siran M Koroukian
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Antibiotic use in pregnancy and drug-resistant infant sepsis.

Authors:  B M Mercer; T L Carr; D D Beazley; D T Crouse; B M Sibai
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Evaluation of universal antenatal screening for group B streptococcus.

Authors:  Melissa K Van Dyke; Christina R Phares; Ruth Lynfield; Ann R Thomas; Kathryn E Arnold; Allen S Craig; Janet Mohle-Boetani; Ken Gershman; William Schaffner; Susan Petit; Shelley M Zansky; Craig A Morin; Nancy L Spina; Kathryn Wymore; Lee H Harrison; Kathleen A Shutt; Joseph Bareta; Sandra N Bulens; Elizabeth R Zell; Anne Schuchat; Stephanie J Schrag
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section.

Authors:  Fiona M Smaill; Gillian Ml Gyte
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

Review 9.  Preterm premature rupture of the membranes.

Authors:  Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of postpartum perineal wound complications: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Neena Duggal; Celia Mercado; Kay Daniels; Alexandra Bujor; Aaron B Caughey; Yasser Y El-Sayed
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  2 in total

1.  Overuse of antibiotics in maternity and neonatal wards, a descriptive report from public hospitals in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Authors:  Mwaka A Kakolwa; Susannah L Woodd; Alexander M Aiken; Fatuma Manzi; Giorgia Gon; Wendy J Graham; Abdunoor M Kabanywanyi
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 4.887

2.  Pattern of Antibiotic Use in the Perinatal Period in a Public University Hospital in Romania.

Authors:  Viviana Hodoșan; Cristian Marius Daina; Dana Carmen Zaha; Petru Cotrău; Adriana Vladu; Carmen Pantiș; Florica Ramona Dorobanțu; Marcel Negrău; Adriana Maghiar; Lucia Georgeta Daina
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 2.948

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.