| Literature DB >> 27312699 |
Dionne E Maessen1, Nordin M Hanssen1, Mirjam A Lips2, Jean L Scheijen1, Ko Willems van Dijk2,3,4, Hanno Pijl2,4, Coen D Stehouwer1, Casper G Schalkwijk5.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Dicarbonyl compounds are formed as byproducts of glycolysis and are key mediators of diabetic complications. However, evidence of postprandial α-dicarbonyl formation in humans is lacking, and interventions to reduce α-dicarbonyls have not yet been investigated. Therefore, we investigated postprandial α-dicarbonyl levels in obese women without and with type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, we evaluated whether a diet very low in energy (very low calorie diet [VLCD]) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) reduces α-dicarbonyl stress in obese women with type 2 diabetes.Entities:
Keywords: Advanced glycation endproducts; Obesity; Type 2 diabetes; Weight loss interventions; α-Dicarbonyls
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27312699 PMCID: PMC4969347 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-016-4009-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetologia ISSN: 0012-186X Impact factor: 10.122
Baseline characteristics of the study population
| Characteristic | Lean ( | Obese NGT ( | Obese T2DM ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 49.2 ± 6.2 | 47.7 ± 6.4 | 51.0 ± 7.1 |
| Weight (kg) | 64.4 ± 7.2 | 124.3 ± 11.7*** | 117.2 ± 17.1 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 21.7 ± 1.6 | 43.8 ± 3.2*** | 42.0 ± 5.5 |
| Waist (cm) | 78.0 ± 6.0 | 122.3 ± 9.2*** | 123.2 ± 11.0 |
| Fat mass (%) | 35.5 ± 2.4 | 56.3 ± 2.2*** | 55.7 ± 4.4 |
| HbA1c (mmol/mol) | 31.9 ± 2.5 | 36.1 ± 7.8 | 49.6 ± 12.0††† |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.1 ± 0.2 | 5.5 ± 0.7 | 6.7 ± 1.1††† |
| Triacylglycerols (mmol/l) | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 1.4 ± 0.6 | 1.8 ± 0.7† |
| NEFA (mmol/l) | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.4 | 1.2 ± 0.3 |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/l) | 5.0 ± 0.9 | 4.6 ± 1.0 | 4.4 ± 0.8 |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/l) | 1.7 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.3*** | 1.1 ± 0.3 |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/l) | 2.9 ± 0.9 | 2.9 ± 0.9 | 2.5 ± 0.6 |
| HOMA-IR | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 2.3** | 5.4 ± 3.6† |
Data are presented as means ± SD
Differences between the groups were tested using a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction
**p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 for lean vs obese NGT individuals.
† p < 0.05 and ††† p < 0.001 for obese NGT individuals vs obese individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM)
Fig. 1Baseline plasma levels of α-dicarbonyls and glucose before and during a mixed meal test. Plasma levels during the MMT of (a) MGO, (c) GO, (e) 3-DG and (g) glucose and iAUC, as calculated from the MMT of (b) MGO, (d) GO, (f) 3-DG and (h) glucose. Data are shown as means (SEM). Triangles, lean, n = 12; squares, obese NGT, n = 27; circles, obese type 2 diabetic individuals, n = 27. Differences in postprandial curves during the mixed meal between the groups were tested with repeated-measures two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction. Differences in the iAUCs of MGO, GO, 3-DG and glucose between the groups were tested with one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001 compared with lean individuals and ††† p < 0.001 compared with obese NGT individuals
Fig. 2Plasma levels of α-dicarbonyls and glucose in obese individuals with type 2 diabetes after 3 weeks of a VLCD. Plasma levels during the MMT of (a) MGO, (c) GO, (e) 3-DG and (g) glucose and iAUC, as calculated from the MMT, of (b) MGO, (d) GO, (f) 3-DG and (h) glucose. Data are shown as means (SEM). Black circles, obese type 2 diabetes individuals before the VLCD; open circles, obese type 2 diabetes individuals 3 weeks after the VLCD, n = 12. Differences in fasting levels and the iAUCs of MGO, GO, 3-DG and glucose were tested with paired two-sided samples t tests. *p < 0.05 compared with baseline