Zhize Yuan1, Haiqing Li1, Quan Qi1, Wenhui Gong1, Cheng Qian2, Rong Dong2, Yi Zang3, Jia Li3,4, Mi Zhou1, Junfeng Cai1, Zhe Wang1, Anqing Chen1, Xiaofeng Ye1, Qiang Zhao1. 1. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Ruijin Er Road 197, Shanghai, 200025, P.R. China. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Ruijin Er Road 197, Shanghai, 200025, P.R. China. 3. State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, P.R. China. 4. East China Normal University, Institutes for Advanced Interdisciplinary Research, North Zhongshan Road Campus: 3663 N. Zhongshan Rd., Shanghai 200062, P.R. China.
Abstract
Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) has recently emerged as a risk predictor in patients with cardiovascular diseases. We therefore aimed to investigate the role of GDF-15 in the occurrence of cardiac injury during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). 55 consecutive patients with coronary artery diseases were recruited in this prospective, observational study. All patients were operated for OPCAB surgery. Serial blood samples were collected preoperatively, 12 hours and 36 hours after surgery. GDF-15, together with C-reactive protein, cardiac troponin I, creatine kinase MB and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide levels in plasma were measured at each time-point. GDF-15 levels increased significantly at 12 hours after surgery, attaining nearly 2.5 times the baseline levels (p < 0.001). Postoperative GDF-15 levels correlated positively with cTnI (p = 0.003) and EuroSCORE II (p = 0.013). According to the ROC curves, postoperative plasma GDF-15 was found to be the best biomarker to predict perioperative cardiac injury, compared with cTnI, CK-MB and EuroSCORE II. Circulating GDF-15 is a promising novel biomarker for identifying perioperative myocardial injury in patients undergoing OPCAB.
Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) has recently emerged as a risk predictor in patients with cardiovascular diseases. We therefore aimed to investigate the role of GDF-15 in the occurrence of cardiac injury during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB). 55 consecutive patients with coronary artery diseases were recruited in this prospective, observational study. All patients were operated for OPCAB surgery. Serial blood samples were collected preoperatively, 12 hours and 36 hours after surgery. GDF-15, together with C-reactive protein, cardiac troponin I, creatine kinase MB and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide levels in plasma were measured at each time-point. GDF-15 levels increased significantly at 12 hours after surgery, attaining nearly 2.5 times the baseline levels (p < 0.001). Postoperative GDF-15 levels correlated positively with cTnI (p = 0.003) and EuroSCORE II (p = 0.013). According to the ROC curves, postoperative plasma GDF-15 was found to be the best biomarker to predict perioperative cardiac injury, compared with cTnI, CK-MB and EuroSCORE II. Circulating GDF-15 is a promising novel biomarker for identifying perioperative myocardial injury in patients undergoing OPCAB.
Myocardial injury and dysfunction are common and severe complications occurring during the post-operative period in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, and are associated with adverse outcomes such as longer length of hospital stay and higher mortality1234. Moreover, clinical studies have shown that myocardial injury may be associated with higher risk of developing heart failure in the long term567. There are multiple proposed mechanisms thought to be responsible for post-operative cardiac injury including, but not limited to, calcium overload, oxygen free radical formation, neutrophil-mediated myocardial and endothelial injury, progressive decline in microvascular flow to the reperfused myocardium. The main causes are cardiac ischemia due to hypothermia, reduced blood flow, hypotension in operation procedure, atheroembolism, and inflammatory response, which may contribute to ischemia-reperfusion injuries8. These factors are interconnected in the pathophysiology of post-operative myocardial injury. Early detection of perioperative clinical biomarkers may aid us in the timely diagnosis and management of myocardial injury.Various biological and hemodynamic markers have been measured to estimate the pre-and post-operative risk of developing complications9. In clinical practice, serum cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and creatine kinase MB (CK-MB) has traditionally been used for the assessment of myocardial injury after cardiac surgery1011. A sharply rise in serum cTnI and CK-MB has been regarded as a sign of acute myocardial infarction (AMI)12. In spite of its widespread use, serum CK-MB and cTnI remains a flawed diagnostic potential for myocardial injury. Among other disadvantages, serum CK-MB level is a function not only of myocardial injury, but also production mainly by skeletal muscle cells. Because of this point, conditions that affect muscle mass (such as strenuous exercise, age, gender, race) may influence the level and the degree of increase in serum CK-MB13. In addition, a rise in serum cTnI occurs relatively late in the course of postoperative myocardial injury14, which makes early diagnosis and intervention difficult when relied upon cTnI as the main diagnostic method.Growth-differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) was found to be a new stress-responsive member of the transforming growth factor-β superfamily that was known as macrophage inhibitory cytokine-115. Cardiomyocytes weakly express this cytokine under physiological conditions16. In response to inflammation as well as oxidative stress and ischemia reperfusion (I/R), expression levels of GDF-15 rise significantly17. This biomarker thus seems particularly relevant in the setting of cardiac surgery procedure, in which most of these mechanisms are involved. Several multicenter clinical trials showed that GDF-15 can be regarded as a reliable biomarker of cardiovascular disease and chronic heart failure and is of independent prognostic value in predicting coronary artery disease (CAD), acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and heart failure (HF)918192021.Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) is part of the procedural armamentarium of a growing proportion of cardiac surgeons worldwide, especially in Asia. Studies comparing high-risk patient between OPCAB vs on-pump CABG have proved better outcome with OPCAB patients2223. In a study with large population of patients undergoing cardiac surgery, it has been shown that the addition of pre-operative plasma level of GDF-15 to the EuroSCORE and other cardiovascular risk markers such as NT-proBNP or hsTNT dramatically improves the prognostic value for post-operative mortality and morbidity mortality2. However, no thoroughly analyzed data exist regarding the potential interest of role and impact of GDF-15 in the occurrence of myocardial injury during OPCAB. The aim of the present study was to evaluate plasma levels of GDF-15 and their diagnostic validity in patients with CAD undergoing OPCAB procedure, and to assess its relations to biochemical baseline variables and clinical cardiac dysfunction.
Results
Basic clinical characteristics of patients
The preoperative clinical and laboratory information of the 55 patients enrolled in the study are listed in Table 1. The Mean age was 66.5 ± 9.1 years and males constituted 80% of the total subjects. Factors, such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia and smoking were 72.7%, 40.0%, 34.5% and 38.2% respectively. CRP were 0.49(0.16–1.26) mg/L (range 0.10–7.86 mg/L), creatinines were 88.3 ± 28.7 mmol/L (range 55.0–250.0 mmol/L), cTnI were 0.01(0.01–1.78) ng/mL, and NT-proBNP levels were 488.7 ± 532.4 ng/mL (range 5.0–2036.0 ng/l). All patients received off-pump cardiac surgery. The majority of patients (n = 39) underwent at least three bypass grafts. Preoperative LVEF (%) was 63.3 ± 7.1 and the mean EuroSCORE II was 2.2. During their hospital stay, 5(3.6%) participants developed Perioperative myocardial infarction (PMI). All of the patients were still alive on 31st July 2015.
Table 1
Demographic and Perioperative Characteristics of Enrolled Patients.
Baseline parameter
n(%), median (interquartile range), mean ± SD
P value
Clinical data
Age, years
66.5 ± 9.1
P = 0.005
Male Gender
44 (80.0)
P = 0.073
Body mass index, kg/m2
23.1 ± 2.4
P = 0.025
Systemic hypertension
40(72.7)
P = 0.037
Diabetes mellitus
22(40)
P = 0.006
hyperlipidemia
19(34.5)
P = 0.410
Smoking
21(38.2)
P = 0.940
CCS
2(2–3)
P = 0.591
NYHA
2(2–3)
P = 0.458
Prior myocardial infarction
10(18.2)
P = 0.134
Preoperative LVEF (%)
63.3 ± 7.1
P = 0.229
EuroSCOREII
2.2 ± 0.8
P = 0.004
Previous treatments
Aspirin
53(96.4)
Beta blockers
43(78.2)
Statins
40(72.7)
ACE inhibitors
39(70.9)
Preoperative Biological data
Serum creatinine, mmol/L
88.3 ± 28.7
P = 0.007
Haemoglobin
130.0 ± 14.3
P = 0.005
NT-proBNP, ng/L
488.7 ± 532.4
P = 0.022
Troponin I, ng/ml
0.01(0.01–0.07)
P = 0.012
Creatine kinase MB, U/l
1.7 ± 1.4
P = 0.372
CRP, mg/L
0.49(0.16–1.26)
P = 0.040
BMI, body mass index; OPCAB, off-pump coronary artery bypass; CCS, Canadian classification score for angina grade; NYHA, New York Heart Association grade for heart failure; ACE, angiotensinconverting enzyme; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; EuroSCOREII, European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II; ICU, intensive care unit; CAD, Coronary artery disease; CRP, C reactive protein.
Correlation between plasma pre-SURG GDF-15 concentrations and baseline characteristics
Mean GDF-15 levels were 1463.5 ± 800.1 ng/l (range 540.8–4249.7 ng/l). Associations between laboratory parameters and GDF-15 plasma concentrations were tested using Spearman’s correlation rank test. There was a significant correlation between pre-operative (pre-SURG) circulating levels of GDF-15 and the age (r = 0.37; P = 0.005, Fig. 1A), serum creatinine (r = 0.36; P = 0.007, Fig. 1B), CRP (r = 0.39; P = 0.004, Fig. 1C), NT-proBNP levels (r = 0.31, p = 0022, Fig. 1D), EuroSCORE II (r = 0.39; P = 0.004, Fig. 1E), and cTnI (r = 0.34; P = 0.012, Fig. 1F). In contrast, no significant correlation was observed between GDF-15 and LVEF (P = 0.23). Moreover, regarding categorical variables, GDF-15 levels were significantly related to the hypertension (1600.8 ± 830.9 ng/l vs. 1097.6 ± 590.3 ng/l, p = 0.037, Fig. 2A) and diabetes (1668 ± 269.1 ng/l vs. 1379 ± 123.5 ng/l, P = 0.006, Fig. 2B). However, plasma GDF-15 levels were insignificantly in patients with hyperlipemia (1340.4 ± 694.4 ng/l vs. 1528.5 ± 852.7 ng/l, P = 0.41). At enrollment, 12 of 55 patients were in NYHA functional class III or IV heart failure and showed a significantly higher GDF-15 levels (2032.0 ± 1108.0 vs 1305.0 ± 619.0 ng/l, P = 0.002) as compared to those patients in NYHA functional class I and II (Fig. 2C).
Figure 1
The correlation between pre-SURG circulating GDF-15 levels and baseline characteristics.
Plasma GDF-15 was significant correlated with (A) age (r = 0.37; p = 0.005), (B) serum creatinine (r = 0.36; p = 0.007), (C) CRP (r = 0.39; p = 0.004), (D) NT-proBNP levels (r = 0.31, p = 0022), (E) EuroSCOREII (r = 0.39; p = 0.004), (F) cTnI (r = 0.34; p = 0.012).
Figure 2
Association of pre-SURG circulating GDF-15 levels with clinical variables.
GDF-15 levels were significantly related to the (A) hypertension (1600.8 ± 830.9 ng/l vs. 1097.6 ± 590.3 ng/l, p = 0.037) and (B) diabetes (1668 ± 269.1 ng/l vs. 1379 ± 123.5 ng/l, P = 0.006). Patients in NYHA functional class III or IV heart failure showed a significantly higher GDF-15 levels (2032.0 ± 1108.0 vs 1305.0 ± 619.0 ng/l, P = 0.002) as compared to those patients in NYHA functional class I and II (C) (Student’s test).
Correlation between levels of post-SURG GDF-15 and extent of myocardial injury
The postoperative clinical and laboratory information of the patients enrolled in the study are listed in Table 2. The circulating levels of GDF-15, as indicated by the fold change values, were highly elevated at 12 h after surgery in OPCAB patients. Mean post-operative 12 h, 36 h GDF-15 levels were 3293 ± 800.1 ng/l (range 1029.6–6832.9 ng/l) and 1828 ± 897.9 ng/l (range 600.9–4721.0 ng/l) respectively. The 12 h GDF-15 levels were 2.5 fold (P < 0.0001) higher than the pre-SURG control level (Fig. 3A). To further document an association between circulating concentrations of GDF-15 and myocardial injury, time course of simultaneous GDF-15, cTnI and CK-MB plasma levels were assessed (Fig. 3B,C). We correlated cTnI, CK-MB levels with GDF-15 levels. As illustrated in Fig. 4, a significant correlation was observed between the post-SURG 12 h GDF-15 and cTnI (r = 0.40, P = 0.003, Fig. 4A). However, an association statistic between the post-SURG 12 h GDF-15 and CK-MB shows no significant association (r = 0.20, P = 0.151, Fig. 4B). Thus, the release of the cardiac-enriched GDF-15 reflected the extent of myocardial injury as measured by cTnI release into circulation.
Table 2
The postoperative clinical and laboratory information of the patient.
Postoperative parameter
n(%), median (interquartile range), mean ± SD
P value
Distal coronary anastomose (no./patient)
3 (2–4)
P = 0.302
Haemoglobin
111.8 ± 16.6
P = 0.175
Troponin I, ng/ml
1.0 ± 1.1
P = 0.001
Creatine kinase MB, U/l
11.3 ± 12.7
P = 0.151
Postoperative LVEF (%)
63.3 ± 7.1
P = 0.146
In-hospital stay after surgery (days)
8.1 ± 2.9
P = 0.408
ICU stay (days)
2.2 ± 0.7
P = 0.018
Postoperative atrial fibrillation
7(12.7)
P = 0.090
Figure 3
Time course of plasma GDF-15 levels (A), cTnI levels (B) and CK-MB levels (C) given as the mean ± SD. On average, GDF-15 levels, cTnI levels and CK-MB levels exhibited a 2.5- to 5-fold increase in plasma samples collected 12 h after OPCAB, respectively. **Significantly different (p < 0.01) between time-point and pre-SURG levels (One way repeated measures ANOVA).
Figure 4
The correlation between post- SURG 12 h circulating GDF-15 levels and markers of cardiac injury.
A significant correlation was observed between the post-SURG 12 h GDF-15 and cTnI (r = 0.40, P = 0.003) (A), However, an association statistic between the post-SURG 12 h GDF-15 and CK-MB shows no significant association (r = 0.20, P = 0.151) (B).
Proposed predictive levels of circulating GDF-15 for PMI
5 patients had PMI according to the diagnostic criteria of the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Third Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction24: 5 had an elevation of cTnI > 10 × 99th percentile upper reference limit during the first 48 h, 3 had new pathological Q waves and 2 had new LBBB on ECG within 24 h, 2 had new regional wall motion abnormality within 12 h, and none had angiographic documented new graft or new native coronary artery occlusion. Univariate analysis revealed that cTnI, CK-MB, GDF-15, and EuroSCOREII were significantly associated with PMI. In a multivariate statistical model, GDF-15 was found to be significantly independently associated (p = 0.008). According to ROC curve analysis, PMI was predicted by GDF-15 levels with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95%CI 0.87–1.01, P = 0.001) and cTnI with an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.75–1.02, P = 0.005), and EuroSCOREII with an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.75–1.00, P = 0.006) and is illustrated in Fig. 5. GDF-15 was a better postoperative plasma biomarker to predict PMI than cTnI or EuroSCOREII. As for CK-MB, for a cutoff value of 6.5U/l, the sensitivity was only 80.0% and the specificity 50.0%, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.576(0.28–0.87). GDF-15 was also substantially better than the CK-MB in predicting PMI. The optimal cutoff value of GDF-15 for the prediction of PMI was calculated to be 4638 ng/l with a sensitivity of 100.0% and a specificity of 88.0%.
Figure 5
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves comparing sensitivity and specificity of GDF-15, cTnI, CK-MB and EuroSCOREII for the identification of PMI at 12 h after OPCAB.
The thin diagonal line is the Null Hypothesis: True area = 0.50. PMI was predicted by GDF-15 levels with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 (95%CI 0.87–1.01, P = 0.001) and cTnI with an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.75–1.02, P = 0.005), and EuroSCOREII with an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI 0.75–1.00, P = 0.006). As for CK-MB, for a cutoff value of 6.5U/l, the sensitivity was only 80.0% and the specificity 50.0%, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.576(0.28–0.87).
As noted in Fig. 5, ROC analysis demonstrated the superior sensitivity and specificity of GDF-15 over CK-MB, cTnI and EuroSCOREII in the early detection of myocardial necrosis after OPCAB.
Discussion
Cardiac surgery is associated with a systemic inflammatory response, which has implications for postoperative recovery and myocardial function25. Perioperative myocardial infarction (PMI) has been regarded as one of the severity complications for CABG and is associated with high morbidity and mortality for a long period of time26. Since no effective pharmacological therapy is available to treat PMI once occured, early preventive measures, including preoperative risk prediction and perioperative optimization may be a good way to reduce PMI27. Thus, PMI prediction thanks to a novel biomarker could provide valuable information in the perioperative management.In experimental conditions, GDF-15 is widely expressed in cardiomyocytes, macrophages, adipocytes, vascular smooth muscle cells, and endothelial cells in pathological condition. GDF-15 expression is highly induced in cardiomyocytes after ischemia/reperfusion. GDF-15 inhibits the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activation and NF-κB/JNK/caspase-3 pathway to provide its cardioprotective effect28.Increased expression of GDF-15 was observed in the human heart within hours after myocardial infarction and remains elevated in the infarcted myocardium for several days. Cardiomyocytes in the infarct border zone have been identified as the main source of GDF-1517. In patients with diseases manifested by ineffective erythropoiesis, high GDF15 levels are present in the serum29. Catherine et al. reported a significant association between hemoglobin and GDF-15 levels during the post-operative period30.In accordance with the clinical literature, some studies have shown that GDF-15 concentrations correlated strongly with age in adults31. Ho et al. reported that GDF-15 concentrations in healthy younger adults were lower than those in elderly adults32. It has been found that these changes of GDF-15 concentrations could reflect both cardiovascular inflammation and other pathophysiological processes3334. The association between increased GDF-15 levels and diabetes has also been revealed. Several human studies dealing with GDF-15 levels in obesity and diabetes have shown that Serum GDF-15 levels were elevated in obese and type 2 diabeticpatients and correlated with glucose and body mass index (BMI)35. Li, J. et al. proved that increased GDF-15 protects endothelial cells against glucose induced cellular injury via activating PI3 K/AKT/eNOS signaling pathway and attenuating NF-κB/JNK activation36. In non-diabetic individuals, GDF-15 could predict future impaired glucose control and insulin resistance, and in population free of clinically-overt cardiovascular disease, GDF-15 levels are positively associated with age, diabetes, hypertension, creatinine and NTproBNP levels32. Indeed, several studies have also reported higher plasma GDF-15 levels in patients with cardiovascular pathologies such as coronary artery disease (CAD)181933 or chronic heart failure2037.GDF-15 regulates signaling pathways for the essential of cardioprotection. GDF-15 activates Smad1 and reduces apoptotic cell death via upregulation of Bcl-xL and β-catenin. GDF-15 shows cardiac protective effect by activation of ALK type 1 receptors and phosphorylation of Smad2/3 and Smad1/5/838. GDF-15 was a reliable biomarker of fatal events in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Furthermore, in patients with CAD, GDF-15 concentrations correlated with other biomarkers of inflammation. GDF-15 is associated with NT-proBNP and cTnT levels at presentation in those myocardial infarction patients33. Pre-operative GDF-15 plasma levels are also associated with post-operative AKI in CABG patients39. GDF-15 even improved risk stratification using the EuroSCORE before cardiac surgery2. Interestingly, Charles et al. clearly showed that preoperative GDF-15 levels increased a potential new predictive value to classic risk factors of postoperative atrial fibrillation in CABG and OPCAB40.However, in the particular setting of PMI, very few studies are available regarding its predict value. Common factors of acute organ dysfunction after cardiac surgery have been described such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and on-pump surgery. Most of these predictive criteria were also found in our population except for on-pump surgery. The present study showed that pre-operative GDF-15 levels in patients undergoing OPCAB were positively associated with age, hypertension, diabetes, Scr, EuroSCOREII, NT-proBNP, hemoglobin, and plasma CRP levels. This is in agreement with previous researchs showing that GDF-15 was a novel independent biomarker in cardiovascular disease2134. Apart from the preoperative clinical markers, we also found a considerable positive association between GDF-15 and cTnI during the post-operative period. In terms of the present study, it was interesting to note that there was no substantial positive correlation between GDF-15 and CK-MB. Persisting elevated GDF-15 levels closely related to myocardial injury, revealed by the plasma levels of cTnI. However, to our knowledge, this is the first study to report that elevated GDF-15 levels are strongly associated with biomarkers of myocardial injury after off-pump cardiac surgery. Moreover, despite its positive association with traditional risk factors of PMI in our study, the association between GDF-15 and PMI was independent of these risk factors.During the cardiac surgery, multiple factors can lead to perioperative myocardial injury, including ischemia-reperfusion injury and cardiac dysfunction41. During the perioperative period, nonphysiological changes may be induced by changes in morphology and function of coronary plaque, which may trigger a mismatch between myocardial oxygen demand and supply42 contributing to myocardial ischemia and the cumulative release of biomarkers for myocardial injury. The correct clinical diagnosis of PMI is lagging, and very few studies concerning it associated with OPCAB. Our study demonstrated the superior sensitivity and specificity of GDF-15 over cTnI and EuroSCOREII in the early detection of myocardial necrosis after OPCAB. We believe that it is valuable to measure and identify GDF-15 as a more effective and sensitive biomarker than troponin to diagnose PMI, enabling more accurate therapeutic interventions and reducing postoperative morbidity and mortality.
Conclusions
A perioperative measurement of plasma GDF-15 levels added a significant predictive value to classical risk factors of cardiac surgery. In patients with GDF-15 levels exceeding 4638 ng/l, further cardiac diagnosis and medical intervention should be considered because myocardial infarction or myocardial necrosis may be indicated. GDF-15 can be used as a novel biomarker for the detection of PMI of the OPCAB surgery in patients with coronary artery disease.
Materials and Methods
Study design
This study was designed as a prospective observational cohort study. The independent Medical Ethics Committee of the Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine approved the study protocol according to the Helsinki declaration. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before enrollment. The experiment methods were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines and regulations.
Patients population
A total of 55 consecutive patients between February to June 2015 at the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China were included in this prospective study. Patients with a Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥40%, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter(LVED) ≤60 mm, without diffuse disease in target coronary artery are prone to be performed the revascularization with off pump. Patients with a porcelain or atherosclerotic aorta in whom there is increased risk for aortic trauma or cerebral embolization are also advocated revascularized with the use of OPCAB techniques. All patients operated on by 3 experienced surgeons (ZQ, CAQ, WZ) for OPCAB surgery procedure. The following criteria led to the exclusion of patients: refusal to provide consent, age <18 or >80 years, previous cardiac surgery and emergency surgery, primary and secondary myocardiopathy, combination with congenital heart disease, ACS reported within 30 days before the surgery, inflammatory disease or autoimmune disease, infectious or malignant tumor, transplant patients and patients treated with corticosteroids.
Data collection
Clinical data of the enrolled patients collected from medical records was exhaustive, and the following variables were recorded: age, sex, usual cardiovascular risk factors, cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases, previous regular medication, and echocardiographic parameters. All of the patients underwent preoperative transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). The Echocardiographic data sets were assessed by investigators blinded to the laboratory results. LVEF was calculated using the Simpson method on the apical four-chamber and apical two-chamber views.
Anesthesia and cardiac surgery procedure
Patients were pre-medicated with Alprazolam orally 12 h before anesthesia. Routine cardiac medications such as β-blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), calcium channel blockers (CCB), and lipid lowering drugs were continued until the morning of the surgery, except for aspirin and clopidogrel, which were stopped at least 1 day earlier. After a radial artery hemodynamic monitoring system was set up in the operating room. Anesthesia was induced with intravenous midazolam (0.03 mg/kg), sufentanil (0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg/h), and propofol (1.5 to 2.5 mg/kg). After verifying that manual ventilation was satisfactory, cisatracurium (0.06 mg/kg/h) was injected. Patients were orally intubated and ventilated with FiO2: 40%. Anesthesia was maintained with sufentanil and cisatracurium as required and inhaled desflurane.Following general anesthesia and median sternotomy, the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and saphenous vein graft were harvested simultaneously in all of the patients. Off-pump surgery procedure was performed on the beating heart utilizing a stabilizer (Octopus Medtronic, MN, USA) and an intracoronary shunt (Guidant Axius Coronary Shunt, Guidant Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Patients were heparinized intravenously to achieve an activated clotting time >300 s. A side-biting aorta clamp was usually used when proximal anastomoses were performed. Flow measurements are carried out with transit time flow probes (Medtronic, Inc, USA). After closure of the sternum, patients were transferred safety to the postoperative intensive care unit (ICU).
Blood sampling and Biochemical analyses
Blood samples of the enrolled patients were collected and analyzed for routine blood testing on the second day morning of hospital admission (Pre-SURG) were used as baseline reference values. The following measurements were made: CK-MB, cTnI, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), C-reactive protein (CRP), hemoglobin, blood glucose, total plasma cholesterol, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and creatinine. Plasma levels of cTnI were determined by electrochemiluminescence-based methods with a Beckman ACCESS2 Analyzer. The upper limit for the normal reference range was 0.04 ng/l. Biochemical measurements were performed using standard laboratory techniques. All biochemical analyses were performed by investigators blinded to the clinical data of the patients.GDF-15 levels in plasma were measured on the Pre-SURG time point, 12 h and 36 h after arrival at the ICU (Post-SURG). From the patients, 3 mL blood was collected from the median cubital vein of the patients into a tube containing EDTA anticoagulant. After incubation at room temperature for 2 h, Blood samples were centrifuged and the plasma was immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until measurement. Plasma GDF-15 concentrations were measured in duplicate by quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay (Quantikine, R&D Systems, USA). The color intensity, relative to GDF-15 concentration, was measured at 450 nm with a spectrophotometer (BioTek, Winooski, VT, United States).
Statistical analyses
Data were analyzed using standard statistical software SPSS version 19.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois, USA) and GraphPad Prism 6.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc, California, USA). Continuous variables are presented as means ± standard deviations (SD) unless otherwise indicated; categorical variables as numbers (percentages). For continuous data, normality was checked by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Non parametric variables were reported as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR). Differences between unpaired groups were analyzed using a Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and a χ2 test (or Fisher exact test, if numbers were small) for dichotomous variables. A double-sided p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all tests. Associations between laboratory parameters and GDF-15 were tested using Spearman’s correlation rank test. To examine the discrimination of myocardial infarction, we examined the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) Curve (plot of sensitivity versus 1−specificity for all possible cut-off values for classifying predictions) for post-SURG 12 h GDF-15, cTnI, CK-MB and EuroSCOREII with the best sensitivity and specificity according to the Youden index43. The cut-off value is given in the Results section. Areas under the ROC curves were compared according to the methods described by DeLong et al.44 for paired data.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Yuan, Z. et al. Plasma levels of growth differentiation factor-15 are associated with myocardial injury in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Sci. Rep.
6, 28221; doi: 10.1038/srep28221 (2016).
Authors: Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Allan S Jaffe; Maarten L Simoons; Bernard R Chaitman; Harvey D White; Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Harvey D White; Allan S Jaffe; Hugo A Katus; Fred S Apple; Bertil Lindahl; David A Morrow; Bernard R Chaitman; Peter M Clemmensen; Per Johanson; Hanoch Hod; Richard Underwood; Jeroen J Bax; Jeroen J Bonow; Fausto Pinto; Raymond J Gibbons; Keith A Fox; Dan Atar; L Kristin Newby; Marcello Galvani; Christian W Hamm; Barry F Uretsky; Ph Gabriel Steg; William Wijns; Jean-Pierre Bassand; Phillippe Menasche; Jan Ravkilde; E Magnus Ohman; Elliott M Antman; Lars C Wallentin; Paul W Armstrong; Maarten L Simoons; James L Januzzi; Markku S Nieminen; Mihai Gheorghiade; Gerasimos Filippatos; Russell V Luepker; Stephen P Fortmann; Wayne D Rosamond; Dan Levy; David Wood; Sidney C Smith; Dayi Hu; Jose-Luis Lopez-Sendon; Rose Marie Robertson; Douglas Weaver; Michal Tendera; Alfred A Bove; Alexander N Parkhomenko; Elena J Vasilieva; Shanti Mendis; Jeroen J Bax; Helmut Baumgartner; Claudio Ceconi; Veronica Dean; Christi Deaton; Robert Fagard; Christian Funck-Brentano; David Hasdai; Arno Hoes; Paulus Kirchhof; Juhani Knuuti; Philippe Kolh; Theresa McDonagh; Cyril Moulin; Bogdan A Popescu; Zeljko Reiner; Udo Sechtem; Per Anton Sirnes; Michal Tendera; Adam Torbicki; Alec Vahanian; Stephan Windecker; Joao Morais; Carlos Aguiar; Wael Almahmeed; David O Arnar; Fabio Barili; Kenneth D Bloch; Ann F Bolger; Hans Erik Botker; Biykem Bozkurt; Raffaele Bugiardini; Christopher Cannon; James de Lemos; Franz R Eberli; Edgardo Escobar; Mark Hlatky; Stefan James; Karl B Kern; David J Moliterno; Christian Mueller; Aleksandar N Neskovic; Burkert Mathias Pieske; Steven P Schulman; Robert F Storey; Kathryn A Taubert; Pascal Vranckx; Daniel R Wagner Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-09-05 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Feng Ming Ho; Wan Wan Lin; Bing Chang Chen; Chien M Chao; Chia-Ron Yang; Lian Y Lin; Chih Chang Lai; Shing H Liu; Chiau S Liau Journal: Cell Signal Date: 2005-06-20 Impact factor: 4.315
Authors: Tibor Kempf; Stephan von Haehling; Timo Peter; Tim Allhoff; Mariantonietta Cicoira; Wolfram Doehner; Piotr Ponikowski; Gerasimos S Filippatos; Piotr Rozentryt; Helmut Drexler; Stefan D Anker; Kai C Wollert Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-08-24 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: André Lamy; P J Devereaux; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; David P Taggart; Shengshou Hu; Ernesto Paolasso; Zbynek Straka; Leopoldo S Piegas; Ahmet Ruchan Akar; Anil R Jain; Nicolas Noiseux; Chandrasekar Padmanabhan; Juan-Carlos Bahamondes; Richard J Novick; Prashant Vaijyanath; Sukesh Kumar Reddy; Liang Tao; Pablo A Olavegogeascoechea; Balram Airan; Toomas-Andres Sulling; Richard P Whitlock; Yongning Ou; Janice Pogue; Susan Chrolavicius; Salim Yusuf Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 91.245