Literature DB >> 2731120

Differential response to chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer in relation to estrogen receptor level. Results of a prospective randomized study.

D Rosner1, W W Lane, T Nemoto.   

Abstract

The predictive value of estrogen receptor (ER) level for response to chemotherapy was studied in 182 patients with metastatic breast cancer in a prospective study. Patients were stratified according to ER status and dominant site of disease and randomized to one of three regimens: cyclophosphamide, 5-Fluorouracil, and prednisone (CFP) versus CFP, methotrexate, and vincristine (CFPMV) versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC). There was no significant differences in all response categories (P = 0.21), was taken as a predictor for response to chemotherapy, there was no significant difference in overall response (P = 0.61) between ER+ (62/108, 57%) and ER- patients (31/49, 63%). However, there was a significant trend toward a higher degree of response in ER- patients (more complete response [CR] nine of 49, 18%, and fewer failures six of 49, 12%) than in ER+ (less CR seven of 108, 7%, and more failures 37/108, 34%) (P = 0.006). Patients with higher measured levels of ER showed worse response (Kendall's tau C, P = 0.026). This trend for ER- patients to have better response than ER+ patients was generally consistent, regardless of the predominant site of metastases or chemotherapy regimen (P = 0.04 for CFP; P = 0.08 for CFPMV; and P = 0.20 for AC). The advantage of a better response for ER- patients was nullified by an earlier relapse which was reflected in longer duration of remission, time to treatment failure, and survival in favor of ER+ patients (12.3 months versus 7.3 months remission duration, 18.7 months versus 13.6 months survival in partial responders). These data suggest that ER- patients respond to a higher extent to chemotherapy but relapse sooner than ER+ patients, suggesting a more rapid growth for ER- tumors. In patients with ER- tumors and poorer prognosis on conventional chemotherapy, new trials of intensive consolidation after response should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2731120     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890701)64:1<6::aid-cncr2820640103>3.0.co;2-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  4 in total

1.  Estrogen receptor expression and docetaxel efficacy in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a pooled analysis of four randomized trials.

Authors:  Fabrice Andre; Kristine Broglio; Lajos Pusztai; Narjiss Berrada; John R Mackey; Jean Marc Nabholtz; Stephen Chan; Gabriel N Hortobagyi
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-04-26

Review 2.  Addition of drug/s to a chemotherapy regimen for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Daria J Butters; Davina Ghersi; Nicholas Wilcken; Steven J Kirk; Peter T Mallon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-11-10

3.  Oestrogen receptor status, pathological complete response and prognosis in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  A E Ring; I E Smith; S Ashley; L G Fulford; S R Lakhani
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-12-13       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 4.  Antitumour antibiotic containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  S Lord; D Ghersi; M Gattellari; S Wortley; N Wilcken; J Simes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.