Literature DB >> 27309676

Cytokine release: A workshop proceedings on the state-of-the-science, current challenges and future directions.

Christine Grimaldi1, Deborah Finco2, Madeline M Fort3, Daniel Gliddon4, Kirsty Harper4, Whitney S Helms5, Jane A Mitchell6, Raegan O'Lone7, Stanley T Parish8, Marie-Soleil Piche9, Daniel M Reed6, Gabriele Reichmann10, Patricia C Ryan11, Richard Stebbings12, Mindi Walker13.   

Abstract

In October 2013, the International Life Sciences Institute - Health and Environmental Sciences Institute Immunotoxicology Technical Committee (ILSI-HESI ITC) held a one-day workshop entitled, "Workshop on Cytokine Release: State-of-the-Science, Current Challenges and Future Directions". The workshop brought together scientists from pharmaceutical, academic, health authority, and contract research organizations to discuss novel approaches and current challenges for the use of in vitro cytokine release assays (CRAs) for the identification of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) potential of novel monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapeutics. Topics presented encompassed a regulatory perspective on cytokine release and assessment, case studies regarding the translatability of preclinical cytokine data to the clinic, and the latest state of the science of CRAs, including comparisons between mAb therapeutics within one platform and across several assay platforms, a novel physiological assay platform, and assay optimization approaches such as determination of FcR expression profiles and use of statistical tests. The data and approaches presented confirmed that multiple CRA platforms are in use for identification of CRS potential and that the choice of a particular CRA platform is highly dependent on the availability of resources for individual laboratories (e.g. positive and negative controls, number of human blood donors), the assay through-put required, and the mechanism-of-action of the therapeutic candidate to be tested. Workshop participants agreed that more data on the predictive performance of CRA platforms is needed, and current efforts to compare in vitro assay results with clinical cytokine assessments were discussed. In summary, many laboratories continue to focus research efforts on the improvement of the translatability of current CRA platforms as well explore novel approaches which may lead to more accurate, and potentially patient-specific, CRS prediction in the future.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cytokine release assay; Cytokine release syndrome; Pro-inflammatory cytokines

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27309676     DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2016.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytokine        ISSN: 1043-4666            Impact factor:   3.861


  10 in total

1.  Development of the first reference antibody panel for qualification and validation of cytokine release assay platforms - Report of an international collaborative study.

Authors:  Sandrine Vessillier; Madeline Fort; Lynn O'Donnell; Heather Hinton; Kimberly Nadwodny; Joseph Piccotti; Peter Rigsby; Karin Staflin; Richard Stebbings; Divya Mekala; Aarron Willingham; Babette Wolf
Journal:  Cytokine X       Date:  2020-12

Review 2.  Safety testing of monoclonal antibodies in non-human primates: Case studies highlighting their impact on human risk assessment.

Authors:  Frank R Brennan; Joy Cavagnaro; Kathleen McKeever; Patricia C Ryan; Melissa M Schutten; John Vahle; Gerhard F Weinbauer; Estelle Marrer-Berger; Lauren E Black
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 3.  Biomarkers for nonclinical infusion reactions in marketed biotherapeutics and considerations for study design.

Authors:  Kirsten M Mease; Amy L Kimzey; Janice A Lansita
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2017-06

Review 4.  Adverse immunostimulation caused by impurities: The dark side of biopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Joannes A A Reijers; Karen E Malone; Jeffrey J Bajramovic; Richard Verbeek; Jacobus Burggraaf; Matthijs Moerland
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Induction of Cytokines by Nucleic Acid Nanoparticles (NANPs) Depends on the Type of Delivery Carrier.

Authors:  Yelixza I Avila; Morgan Chandler; Edward Cedrone; Hannah S Newton; Melina Richardson; Jie Xu; Jeffrey D Clogston; Neill J Liptrott; Kirill A Afonin; Marina A Dobrovolskaia
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 6.  COVID-19: Clinical laboratory diagnosis and monitoring of novel coronavirus infected patients using molecular, serological and biochemical markers: A review.

Authors:  Ghulam Rasool; Muhammad Riaz; Mazhar Abbas; Hina Fatima; Muhammad Mustafa Qamar; Farzana Zafar; Zahed Mahmood
Journal:  Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.298

Review 7.  Cytokine release syndrome.

Authors:  Alexander Shimabukuro-Vornhagen; Philipp Gödel; Marion Subklewe; Hans Joachim Stemmler; Hans Anton Schlößer; Max Schlaak; Matthias Kochanek; Boris Böll; Michael S von Bergwelt-Baildon
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 13.751

8.  Endothelial Glycocalyx-Mediated Intercellular Interactions: Mechanisms and Implications for Atherosclerosis and Cancer Metastasis.

Authors:  Solomon A Mensah; Alina A Nersesyan; Eno E Ebong
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.495

9.  A rapid, sensitive, and reproducible in vivo PBMC humanized murine model for determining therapeutic-related cytokine release syndrome.

Authors:  Chunting Ye; Hongyuan Yang; Mingshan Cheng; Leonard D Shultz; Dale L Greiner; Michael A Brehm; James G Keck
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2020-08-09       Impact factor: 5.834

10.  Positron Emission Tomographic Imaging of Tumor Cell Death Using Zirconium-89-Labeled APOMAB® Following Cisplatin Chemotherapy in Lung and Ovarian Cancer Xenograft Models.

Authors:  Vasilios Liapis; William Tieu; Nicole L Wittwer; Tessa Gargett; Andreas Evdokiou; Prab Takhar; Stacey E Rudd; Paul S Donnelly; Michael P Brown; Alexander H Staudacher
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.488

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.