Literature DB >> 27309623

Clustering of Eye Fixations: A New Oculomotor Determinant of Reading Speed in Maculopathy.

Aurélie Calabrèse1, Jean-Baptiste Bernard2, Géraldine Faure3, Louis Hoffart4, Eric Castet2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe and quantify a largely unnoticed oculomotor pattern that often occurs when patients with central field loss (CFL) read continuous text: Horizontal distribution of eye fixations dramatically varies across sentences and often reveals clusters. Also to statistically analyze the effect of this new factor on reading speed while controlling for the effect of saccadic amplitude (measured in letters per forward saccade, L/FS), an established oculomotor effect.
METHODS: Quantification of nonuniformity of eye fixations (NUF factor) was based on statistical analysis of the curvature of fixation distributions. Linear mixed-effects analyses were performed to predict reading speed from oculomotor factors based on eye movements of 34 AMD and 4 Stargardt patients (better eye decimal acuity from 0.08 to 0.3). Single-line French sentences were read aloud by these patients, who all had a dense scotoma covering the fovea as assessed with MP1 microperimetry.
RESULTS: Nonuniformity of fixations is a strong determinant of reading speed (-0.76 log units; 95% confidence interval [CI] [-0.86, -0.66]). This effect is not confounded with the effect of L/FS. The per sentence proportion of trials with clustering is predicted by the frequency of occurrence of the lowest-frequency word in each sentence.
CONCLUSIONS: The NUF factor is a new oculomotor predictor of reading speed. This effect is independent of the effect of L/FS. Reading performance, as well as motivation to read, might be enhanced if new visual aids or automatic text simplification were used to reduce the occurrence of fixation clustering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27309623     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.16-19318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  11 in total

1.  Low Vision Enhancement with Head-mounted Video Display Systems: Are We There Yet?

Authors:  Ashley D Deemer; Christopher K Bradley; Nicole C Ross; Danielle M Natale; Rath Itthipanichpong; Frank S Werblin; Robert W Massof
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Assessing reading performance in the periphery with a Bayesian adaptive approach: The qReading method.

Authors:  Timothy G Shepard; Fang Hou; Peter J Bex; Luis A Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Deyue Yu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Authors' Response.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Jean-Baptiste Bernard
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Training eye movements for visual search in individuals with macular degeneration.

Authors:  Christian P Janssen; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Evaluation of a gaze-controlled vision enhancement system for reading in visually impaired people.

Authors:  Carlos Aguilar; Eric Castet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Word Mode: a crowding-free reading protocol for individuals with macular disease.

Authors:  Stuart Wallis; Yit Yang; Stephen J Anderson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Current Approaches to Low Vision (Re)Habilitation

Authors:  Deniz Altınbay; Şefay Aysun İdil
Journal:  Turk J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-27

8.  Training to improve temporal processing of letters benefits reading speed for people with central vision loss.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  The inhibitory effect of word neighborhood size when reading with central field loss is modulated by word predictability and reading proficiency.

Authors:  Lauren Sauvan; Natacha Stolowy; Carlos Aguilar; Thomas François; Núria Gala; Frédéric Matonti; Eric Castet; Aurélie Calabrèse
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A comparison of reading, in people with simulated and actual central vision loss, with static text, horizontally scrolling text, and rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  Farah Akthar; Hannah Harvey; Ahalya Subramanian; Simon Liversedge; Robin Walker
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.