Ahmet Soysal1, Hatice Şimşek1, Sinem Doğanay2, Türkan Günay1. 1. Department of Public Health, Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, İzmir, Turkey. 2. Gaziemir Community Health Center, Ministry of Health, İzmir, Turkey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The studies have shown that metabolic syndrome (MetS) leads to an increase twice as much in cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and four times as much in diabetes mellitus (DM) prevalence since the second half of the 20(th) century. AIMS: This study aims to determine and discuss the prevalence of the MetS and co- factors among individuals at the age of 30 and over in Balcova district of İzmir province according to the American National Cholesterol Education Program - Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) and InternationalDiabetes Federation (IDF) criteria. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Data obtained from the Balcova Heart Project in İzmir were used in the study. The dependent variable of the study is MetS existence. The independent variables were socio-demographic characteristics (age, gender, education level, and marital status), self-perceived economic status, physical activity, smoking status, healthy nutrition and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: The prevalence of MetS was 36.9% according to the diagnostic criteria of IDF, while it was 27.4% according to ATP III criteria. According to the both criteria, increasing age, low education, poor economic status perception, physical inactivity, and obesity increase the risk of MetS. Apart from the IDF criteria, being female and a current smoker increase the risk of the MetS in the NCEP-ATP III. CONCLUSION: Compared to educational studies of MetS as of today, which are community and health-oriented studies, it is challenging that the prevalence of MetS was found to be high for both criteria in our study. Therefore, in particular, primary health care doctors must be prompted to protect the public against DM and CVD in particular.
BACKGROUND: The studies have shown that metabolic syndrome (MetS) leads to an increase twice as much in cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and four times as much in diabetes mellitus (DM) prevalence since the second half of the 20(th) century. AIMS: This study aims to determine and discuss the prevalence of the MetS and co- factors among individuals at the age of 30 and over in Balcova district of İzmir province according to the American National Cholesterol Education Program - Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) and InternationalDiabetes Federation (IDF) criteria. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Data obtained from the Balcova Heart Project in İzmir were used in the study. The dependent variable of the study is MetS existence. The independent variables were socio-demographic characteristics (age, gender, education level, and marital status), self-perceived economic status, physical activity, smoking status, healthy nutrition and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: The prevalence of MetS was 36.9% according to the diagnostic criteria of IDF, while it was 27.4% according to ATP III criteria. According to the both criteria, increasing age, low education, poor economic status perception, physical inactivity, and obesity increase the risk of MetS. Apart from the IDF criteria, being female and a current smoker increase the risk of the MetS in the NCEP-ATP III. CONCLUSION: Compared to educational studies of MetS as of today, which are community and health-oriented studies, it is challenging that the prevalence of MetS was found to be high for both criteria in our study. Therefore, in particular, primary health care doctors must be prompted to protect the public against DM and CVD in particular.
Entities:
Keywords:
IDF criteria; NCEP-ATP III criteria; metabolic syndrome; prevalence
Authors: Dante D Morales; Felix Eduardo R Punzalan; Elizabeth Paz-Pacheco; Rody G Sy; Charmaine A Duante Journal: Diab Vasc Dis Res Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 3.291
Authors: Kashif Shafique; Saira Saeed Mirza; Muhammad Kashif Mughal; Zain Islam Arain; Naveed Ahmed Khan; Muhammad Farooq Tareen; Ishtiaque Ahmad Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-07-27 Impact factor: 3.240