Literature DB >> 27307913

Positive somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in accessory spleen mimicking recurrent neuroendocrine tumor.

Mustafa Takesh, Christian M Zechmann, Clemens Kratochwil, Hussam Sahli, Majdi Zein.   

Abstract

We report the case of a female patient who had a neuroendocrine tumor in the pancreatic tail. Followup using (68)Ga DOTA-d-Phe(1)-Tyr(3)-octreotide (DOTATOC) positron-emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) detected a round, well-circumscribed nodular mass that exhibited positive somatostatin receptors. This finding was highly suggestive of an accessory spleen; however, due to the slight elevation of the tumor marker, recurrence of the tumor or lymph node metastasis of the endocrine tumor was considered as well. Ultimately, splenic scintigraphy (SS) confirmed an accessory spleen. This case shows the benefit of splenic scintigraphy in excluding a recurrent neuroendocrine tumor by confirming an accessory spleen.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NET, neuroendocrine tumor; PET, positron emission tomograpy; SPECT, single-photon-emission computed tomography; SS, splenic scintigraphy; SSTR, somatostatin receptor

Year:  2015        PMID: 27307913      PMCID: PMC4900061          DOI: 10.2484/rcr.v6i3.513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Case Rep        ISSN: 1930-0433


Introduction

Accessory spleen is a normal anatomic variant that occurs in approximately 10% of the population. Several reports describe an intrapancreatic accessory spleen that was misdiagnosed as a nonsecreting endocrine tumor, since it exhibits positive somatostatin receptors (SSTRs). The accessory spleen poses a diagnostic challenge even in its extrapancreatic location, mimicking a lymph node metastasis or a local recurrence of a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. An accurate diagnosis is crucial, since such an accessory spleen does not require surgical treatment. During the fifth week of gestation, the spleen develops in the dorsal mesogastrium from mesenchymal cells that migrate between the leaves of the mesentery and coalesce. An accessory spleen may arise from isolated cells that stay separated from the main body of the spleen. In a large series of nonselected autopsy investigations, an accessory spleen was found in 10–30%. (1, 2, 3). In 1,000 consecutive patients undergoing contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scan, an accessory spleen was present in 16% (1, 4). In 80%, the accessory spleen is located at or near the splenic hilum. The second most common site is the pancreatic tail (17%) (1, 3).

Case report

A 59-year-old woman underwent pancreatectomy and splenectomy as consequence of well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET) (pT3, N1, M0). Four years later, she was referred to our department for followup DOTATOC-scintigraphy after a slight elevation of chromogranin A. Other laboratory tests revealed normal CA 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen. However, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy using 68Ga DOTATOC-PET/CT showed a positive uptake in a round mass in the upper left abdominal region (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

59-year-old woman with accessory spleen. DOTATOC-PET/CT after intravenous injection of 206 MBq 68Ga DOTATOC; the axial and coronal planes show an increased focal uptake that corresponds with a nodular lesion (diameter, 15 mm) in the left upper abdominal region (arrows).

This finding could have been a sign of recurrence of NET, considering the elevation of chromogranin A. However, due to its location and round shape, we felt that an accessory spleen should be strongly considered in the differential diagnosis, especially after splenectomy. The critical test that enabled us to determine the lesion's origin turned out to be SS. It demonstrated the ability of the described round mass to accumulate 99mTc-tagged heat-damaged red blood cells, which is a characteristic of splenic tissue (Fig. 2).
Figure 2

59-year-old woman with accessory spleen. Splenic scintigraphy using 99mTc-tagged heat-damaged red-blood-cell scintigraphy, Scintigraphic image (left) and SPECT/CT fused image (right) demonstrate an uptake in the round nodule (arrows) that already exhibited a significant uptake of 68Ga-DOTATOC, confirming the diagnosis of accessory spleen.

It is also worth mentioning that a 99mTc sulfur colloid scan with single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT) could accomplish the same goal as 99mTc heat-denatured red cells for this purpose. Consequently, the recurrent NET was excluded in favor of an accessory spleen exhibiting positive SSTRs. This case shows the benefit of using SS as the method of choice in distinguishing SSTR-positive accessory spleen from recurrent NET.

Discussion

Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) detects neuroendocrine gastroenteropancreatic tumors with a high sensitivity (70% to 95%). It may detect primary and metastatic endocrine tumors not visualized by other imaging techniques, thereby affecting patient management (5). Somatostatin is a small regulatory peptide that functions as a neurotransmitter and has inhibitory and antiproliferative effects. It binds to somatostatin receptors and has several identified subclasses: SSTR1, 2a, 2b, 3, 4, and 5.7. The commercially available somatostatin analog, pentetreotide, is labeled with 111Indium. 68Gallium somatostatin analogs, DOTATOC (DOTA0, D -Phe1, Tyr(3)-octreotate DOTATATE, and DOTA 1-Nal3-octreotide (DOTANOC) are widely used for PET imaging with promising results, but are not currently approved for clinical use in the USA (6). However, SRS may also lead to false-positive results; this is due to the presence of SSTRs on the surface of lymphocytes within the splenic tissue, which also attach SSTR ligands with a high affinity and produce images similar to a recurrent endocrine tumor (5). In Prasad and Baum’s study (7), the highest uptake of 68Ga-DOTANOC was found in the spleen. Considering this result and many others, the spleen tissue (spleen and accessory spleen) can definitely be visualized with SRS. Several reports describe an intrapancreatic accessory spleen that was misdiagnosed as a nonsecreting endocrine tumor (8, 9); our report describes a possible misdiagnosis in case of extrapancreatic accessory spleen. Since the accessory spleen exhibits positive SSTR, it poses a diagnostic challenge even in its extrapancretic location, mimicking a lymph node metastasis or local recurrence of a pancreatic NET. However, definitive diagnosis based on conversional imaging modalities can be difficult because CT scan, MRI, and ultrasound images of such accessory spleens can be quite similar to those of recurrent tumor (Fig. 3). The optimal method is to identify the splenic tissue using 99mTc-tagged heat-damaged red-blood-cell scintigraphy, thus providing a simple, sensitive, and specific method for recognizing the accessory spleen.
Figure 3

59-year-old woman with accessory spleen. Oblique position modified contrast-enhanced abdominal CT. Modified oblique axial plane (left) and oblique coronal plane (right) show the confirmed accessory spleen, whose diameter is 15 mm (arrows).

  9 in total

1.  Fine-needle aspiration of intrapancreatic accessory spleen, mimic of pancreatic neoplasms.

Authors:  Jingmei Lin; Xin Jing
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  Lesions observed in accessory spleens of 311 patients.

Authors:  B HALPERT; F GYORKEY
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1959-08       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  CT features of the accessory spleen.

Authors:  Koenraad J Mortelé; Bart Mortelé; Stuart G Silverman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Radiologic imaging of splenic anomalies.

Authors:  W J Dodds; A J Taylor; S J Erickson; E T Stewart; T L Lawson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  False-positive somatostatin receptor scintigraphy due to an accessory spleen.

Authors:  R Lebtahi; G Cadiot; J P Marmuse; C Vissuzaine; Y Petegnief; A Courillon-Mallet; D Cattan; M Mignon; D Le Guludec
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 6.  Molecular imaging of neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Jorge A Carrasquillo; Clara C Chen
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.929

7.  Biodistribution of the Ga-68 labeled somatostatin analogue DOTA-NOC in patients with neuroendocrine tumors: characterization of uptake in normal organs and tumor lesions.

Authors:  V Prasad; R P Baum
Journal:  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.346

8.  Intrapancreatic Accessory Spleen Misdiagnosed as a Nonsecreting Endocrine Tumor: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Anita Kurmann; Jean-Marie Michel; Edouard Stauffer; Bernhard Egger
Journal:  Case Rep Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07-17

9.  Accessory spleen masquerading as a pancreatic neoplasm.

Authors:  Theresa L Schwartz; Barbara B Sterkel; Goswin Y Meyer-Rochow; Andrew J Gifford; Jaswinder S Samara; Mark S Sywak; Frank E Johnson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.565

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  [Embryonal malformation suggests malignant tumor in the tail of the pancreas].

Authors:  E H Allemeyer; F Fischer; B Heitkötter; T Bethge; M Pützler; M W Hoffmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Spleen Scan for 68Ga-DOTATOC PET-Positive Pancreatic Tail Lesion: Differential Diagnosis of Neuroendocrine Tumor from Accessory Spleen.

Authors:  Hyun Gee Ryoo; Hongyoon Choi; Gi Jeong Cheon
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-12-09

3.  Impact of PET data driven respiratory motion correction and BSREM reconstruction of 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT for differentiating neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and intrapancreatic accessory spleens (IPAS).

Authors:  Virginia Liberini; Fotis Kotasidis; Valerie Treyer; Michael Messerli; Erika Orita; Ivette Engel-Bicik; Alexander Siebenhüner; Martin W Huellner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.