Cory M Tschabrunn1, Sebastien Roujol1, Nicole C Dorman1, Reza Nezafat1, Mark E Josephson1, Elad Anter2. 1. From the Harvard-Thorndike Electrophysiology Institute (C.M.T., M.E.J., E.A.) and Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine (C.M.T., S.R., R.N., M.E.J., E.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and Biosense Webster, Johnson & Johnson, Diamond Bar, CA (N.C.D.). 2. From the Harvard-Thorndike Electrophysiology Institute (C.M.T., M.E.J., E.A.) and Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine (C.M.T., S.R., R.N., M.E.J., E.A.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and Biosense Webster, Johnson & Johnson, Diamond Bar, CA (N.C.D.). eanter@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mapping resolution is influenced by electrode size and interelectrode spacing. The aims of this study were to establish normal electrogram criteria for 1-mm multielectrode-mapping catheters (Pentaray) in the ventricle and to compare its mapping resolution within scar to standard 3.5-mm catheters (Smart-Touch Thermocool). METHODS AND RESULTS: Three healthy swine and 11 swine with healed myocardial infarction underwent sequential mapping of the left ventricle with both catheters. Bipolar voltage amplitude in healthy tissue was similar between 3.5- and 1-mm multielectrode catheters with a 5th percentile of 1.61 and 1.48 mV, respectively. In swine with healed infarction, the total area of low bipolar voltage amplitude (defined as <1.5 mV) was 22.5% smaller using 1-mm multielectrode catheters (21.7 versus 28.0 cm2; P=0.003). This was more evident in the area of dense scar (bipolar amplitude <0.5 mV) with a 47% smaller very low-voltage area identified using 1-mm electrode catheters (7.1 versus 15.2 cm(2); P=0.003). In this region, 1-mm multielectrode catheters recorded higher voltage amplitude (0.72±0.81 mV versus 0.30±0.12 mV; P<0.001). Importantly, 27% of these dense scar electrograms showed distinct triphasic electrograms when mapped using a 1-mm multielectrode catheter compared with fractionated multicomponent electrogram recorded with the 3.5-mm electrode catheter. In 8 mapped reentrant ventricular tachycardias, the circuits included regions of preserved myocardial tissue channels identified with 1-mm multielectrode catheters but not 3.5-mm electrode catheters. Pacing threshold within the area of low voltage was lower with 1-mm electrode catheters (0.9±1.3 mV versus 3.8±3.7 mV; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Mapping with small closely spaced electrode catheters can improve mapping resolution within areas of low voltage.
BACKGROUND: Mapping resolution is influenced by electrode size and interelectrode spacing. The aims of this study were to establish normal electrogram criteria for 1-mm multielectrode-mapping catheters (Pentaray) in the ventricle and to compare its mapping resolution within scar to standard 3.5-mm catheters (Smart-Touch Thermocool). METHODS AND RESULTS: Three healthy swine and 11 swine with healed myocardial infarction underwent sequential mapping of the left ventricle with both catheters. Bipolar voltage amplitude in healthy tissue was similar between 3.5- and 1-mm multielectrode catheters with a 5th percentile of 1.61 and 1.48 mV, respectively. In swine with healed infarction, the total area of low bipolar voltage amplitude (defined as <1.5 mV) was 22.5% smaller using 1-mm multielectrode catheters (21.7 versus 28.0 cm2; P=0.003). This was more evident in the area of dense scar (bipolar amplitude <0.5 mV) with a 47% smaller very low-voltage area identified using 1-mm electrode catheters (7.1 versus 15.2 cm(2); P=0.003). In this region, 1-mm multielectrode catheters recorded higher voltage amplitude (0.72±0.81 mV versus 0.30±0.12 mV; P<0.001). Importantly, 27% of these dense scar electrograms showed distinct triphasic electrograms when mapped using a 1-mm multielectrode catheter compared with fractionated multicomponent electrogram recorded with the 3.5-mm electrode catheter. In 8 mapped reentrant ventricular tachycardias, the circuits included regions of preserved myocardial tissue channels identified with 1-mm multielectrode catheters but not 3.5-mm electrode catheters. Pacing threshold within the area of low voltage was lower with 1-mm electrode catheters (0.9±1.3 mV versus 3.8±3.7 mV; P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Mapping with small closely spaced electrode catheters can improve mapping resolution within areas of low voltage.
Authors: Justin M Stinnett-Donnelly; Nathaniel Thompson; Nicole Habel; Vadim Petrov-Kondratov; Daniel D Correa de Sa; Jason H T Bates; Peter S Spector Journal: Coron Artery Dis Date: 2012-03 Impact factor: 1.439
Authors: Mehmet Akçakaya; Hussein Rayatzadeh; Tamer A Basha; Susie N Hong; Raymond H Chan; Kraig V Kissinger; Thomas H Hauser; Mark E Josephson; Warren J Manning; Reza Nezafat Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-07-19 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Arian Sultan; Barbara Bellmann; Jakob Lüker; Tobias Plenge; Jan-Hendrik van den Bruck; Karlo Filipovic; Susanne Erlhöfer; Liz Kuffer; Zeynep Arica; Daniel Steven Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Sáenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: Europace Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Petra Maagh; Arnd Christoph; Markus Sebastian Müller; Henning Dopp; Gunnar Plehn; Axel Meissner Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2018-01-22 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Mariña López-Yunta; Daniel G León; José Manuel Alfonso-Almazán; Manuel Marina-Breysse; Jorge G Quintanilla; Javier Sánchez-González; Carlos Galán-Arriola; Victoria Cañadas-Godoy; Daniel Enríquez-Vázquez; Carlos Torres; Borja Ibáñez; Julián Pérez-Villacastín; Nicasio Pérez-Castellano; José Jalife; Mariano Vázquez; Jazmín Aguado-Sierra; David Filgueiras-Rama Journal: Europace Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 5.214