Literature DB >> 27306984

Quantification of the pivot-shift test using a navigation system with non-invasive surface markers.

Shugo Maeda1, Eiichi Tsuda2, Yuji Yamamoto2, Takuya Naraoka2, Yuka Kimura2, Yasuyuki Ishibashi2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to validate the quantitation of the pivot-shift phenomenon by using a navigation system with non-invasive surface markers. Measurements obtained using this system were compared with those obtained using commercial pin-fixed markers.
METHODS: Seventy patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries were assessed under general anaesthesia. Knee kinematics during the pivot-shift test were recorded using an image-free navigation system with a commercial transmitter placed on the thigh and lower leg (surface markers) or those fixed to the femur and the tibia via metal pin fixators (pin-fixed markers). For quantitation of the pivot-shift phenomenon, posterior tibial reduction (PTR) was calculated using the two types of navigation system markers and were then compared. PTRs measured using the two types of markers were also compared with clinical grade of the pivot-shift test, as determined by an examiner.
RESULTS: The pivot-shift phenomenon could be identified in all patients on the navigation screen. The PTR measured using surface markers moderately correlated with that measured using pin-fixed markers (ρ = 0.524, p < 0.001). There were also moderate correlations between clinical grades and the PTRs measured using either the surface markers (ρ = 0.522, p < 0.001) or the pin-fixed markers (ρ = 0.645, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that PTR, during the pivot-shift test, may be quantified in ACL-injured knees, using a navigation system with surface markers, and that the PTR measured with surface markers moderately correlated both with the PTR obtained using pin-fixed markers and with the clinical grade of the pivot-shift test. A customised method of fixing transmitters with reflective markers to patients' thighs and shins with Velcro straps is non-invasive and could assess and record the knee kinematics, especially the pivot-shift test, in ACL-injured and ACL-reconstructed knees before, during, and after surgery using a navigation system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, Level IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament injury; Navigation system; Pivot-shift test; Surface marker

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27306984     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4165-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  25 in total

1.  Incidence and mechanism of the pivot shift. An in vitro study.

Authors:  A M Bull; H N Andersen; O Basso; J Targett; A A Amis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Comparison of three non-invasive quantitative measurement systems for the pivot shift test.

Authors:  Paulo H Araujo; Mattias Ahlden; Yuichi Hoshino; Bart Muller; Gele Moloney; Freddie H Fu; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Quantitative assessment of pivot-shift using inertial sensors.

Authors:  Nicola Lopomo; Cecilia Signorelli; Tommaso Bonanzinga; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Andrea Visani; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Similarities and differences of diagnostic manual tests for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency: a global survey and kinematics assessment.

Authors:  Ryosuke Kuroda; Yuichi Hoshino; Seiji Kubo; Daisuke Araki; Shinya Oka; Kouki Nagamune; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  A mechanical pivot-shift device for continuously applying defined loads to cadaveric knees.

Authors:  Mark P Sena; Ryan DellaMaggioria; Jeffrey C Lotz; Brian T Feeley
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Computer-assisted navigation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: accuracy and outcomes.

Authors:  Jason Koh
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.390

7.  In vivo measurement of the pivot-shift test in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee using an electromagnetic device.

Authors:  Yuichi Hoshino; Ryosuke Kuroda; Kouki Nagamune; Masayoshi Yagi; Kiyonori Mizuno; Motoi Yamaguchi; Hirotsugu Muratsu; Shinichi Yoshiya; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Navigation evaluation of the pivot-shift phenomenon during double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: is the posterolateral bundle more important?

Authors:  Yasuyuki Ishibashi; Eiichi Tsuda; Yuji Yamamoto; Harehiko Tsukada; Satoshi Toh
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Reconstructive versus non-reconstructive treatment of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. A retrospective matched-pair long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Nikolaus A Streich; David Zimmermann; Gerrit Bode; Holger Schmitt
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Concepts of the pivot shift.

Authors:  R E Losee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  5 in total

1.  The diagnostic reliability of the quantitative pivot-shift evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system for anterior cruciate ligament deficiency was superior to those of the accelerometer and iPad image analysis.

Authors:  Toshikazu Tanaka; Yuichi Hoshino; Nobuaki Miyaji; Kazuyuki Ibaragi; Kyohei Nishida; Yuichiro Nishizawa; Daisuke Araki; Noriyuki Kanzaki; Takehiko Matsushita; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Prevalence of Segond fractures associated with anterior cruciate ligament injuries and their influence on knee joint stability; A case-control study.

Authors:  Ryotaro Kumahara; Yuka Kimura; Shizuka Sasaki; Eiji Sasaki; Shugo Maeda; Harehiko Tsukada; Yuji Yamamoto; Eiichi Tsuda; Yasuyuki Ishibashi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Smart Brace for Static and Dynamic Knee Laxity Measurement.

Authors:  Paolo Bellitti; Michela Borghetti; Nicola Francesco Lopomo; Emilio Sardini; Mauro Serpelloni
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.847

4.  Increased Rotatory Laxity after Anterolateral Ligament Lesion in Anterior Cruciate Ligament- (ACL-) Deficient Knees: A Cadaveric Study with Noninvasive Inertial Sensors.

Authors:  Alberto Grassi; Tommaso Roberti di Sarsina; Stefano Di Paolo; Cecilia Signorelli; Tommaso Bonanzinga; Federico Raggi; Massimiliano Mosca; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Correlation between quantitative pivot shift and generalized joint laxity: a prospective multicenter study of ACL ruptures.

Authors:  David Sundemo; Anna Blom; Yuichi Hoshino; Ryosuke Kuroda; Nicola Francesco Lopomo; Stefano Zaffagnini; Volker Musahl; James J Irrgang; Jón Karlsson; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 4.342

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.