Literature DB >> 22218829

Comparison of three non-invasive quantitative measurement systems for the pivot shift test.

Paulo H Araujo1, Mattias Ahlden, Yuichi Hoshino, Bart Muller, Gele Moloney, Freddie H Fu, Volker Musahl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate three different non-invasive measuring devices for the pivot shift phenomenon with reference to direct bony movement measured by an electromagnetic device rigidly attached to the tibia and femur.
METHODS: A lower body cadaveric specimen was prepared to create a positive pivot shift in both knees. Twelve expert knee surgeons from worldwide performed their preferred pivot shift technique three times in each knee. After watching an instructional video, the examiners used a standardized technique to perform three additional pivot shift maneuvers in each knee. An electromagnetic tracking system, rigidly attached to femur and tibia, was used to provide reference measurements during the pivot shift test. Three different devices were correlated to the reference method and evaluated in this study: (1) Electromagnetic tracking system with skin sensors; (2) Triaxial accelerometer system; (3) Simple image analysis.
RESULTS: When results from both pivot shift techniques (preferred and standardized) were combined, the electromagnetic tracking system with skin sensors showed positive correlation with the reference measurement for acceleration and translation parameters (r = 0.88 and r = 0.67, respectively; both P < 0.01); The triaxial accelerometer system demonstrated good correlation with the reference measurement for acceleration (r = 0.75; P < 0.001). The image analysis system was poorly correlated to the translation of the reference measurement (r = 0.24; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The electromagnetic tracking system with skin sensors provided the best correlation with the reference method. The triaxial accelerometer showed also a good correlation and the image analysis system showed a positive, but poor correlation with the reference method. More research is needed in order to validate simple and non-invasive devices for clinical application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22218829     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1862-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  27 in total

1.  Similarities and differences of diagnostic manual tests for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency: a global survey and kinematics assessment.

Authors:  Ryosuke Kuroda; Yuichi Hoshino; Seiji Kubo; Daisuke Araki; Shinya Oka; Kouki Nagamune; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Feature selection using a principal component analysis of the kinematics of the pivot shift phenomenon.

Authors:  David R Labbe; Jacques A de Guise; Neila Mezghani; Véronique Godbout; Guy Grimard; David Baillargeon; Patrick Lavigne; Julio Fernandes; Pierre Ranger; Nicola Hagemeister
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Lateral compartment translation predicts the grade of pivot shift: a cadaveric and clinical analysis.

Authors:  Asheesh Bedi; Volker Musahl; Clayton Lane; Musa Citak; Russell F Warren; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Double-bundle ACL reconstruction can improve rotational stability.

Authors:  Masayoshi Yagi; Ryosuke Kuroda; Kouki Nagamune; Shinichi Yoshiya; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  In vivo measurement of the pivot-shift test in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee using an electromagnetic device.

Authors:  Yuichi Hoshino; Ryosuke Kuroda; Kouki Nagamune; Masayoshi Yagi; Kiyonori Mizuno; Motoi Yamaguchi; Hirotsugu Muratsu; Shinichi Yoshiya; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  Clinical test for anterolateral rotary instability of the knee.

Authors:  D B Slocum; S L James; R L Larson; K M Singer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  [Examination of the knee joint. The value of clinical findings in arthroscopic control].

Authors:  K Steinbrück; J C Wiehmann
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1988 May-Jun

8.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee.

Authors:  E S Grood; W J Suntay
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  The accuracy of the clinical examination in the setting of posterior cruciate ligament injuries.

Authors:  R A Rubinstein; K D Shelbourne; J R McCarroll; C D VanMeter; A C Rettig
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Intraoperative measurement of knee kinematics in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  A M J Bull; P H Earnshaw; A Smith; M V Katchburian; A N A Hassan; A A Amis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-09
View more
  27 in total

1.  Use of a gyroscope sensor to quantify tibial motions during a pivot shift test.

Authors:  Per Henrik Borgstrom; Keith L Markolf; Brock Foster; Frank A Petrigliano; David R McAllister
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Anterolateral rotatory instability of the knee.

Authors:  Daniel Guenther; Chad Griffith; Bryson Lesniak; Nicola Lopomo; Alberto Grassi; Stefano Zaffagnini; Freddie H Fu; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Inertial sensors to quantify the pivot shift test in the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Stefano Zaffagnini; Nicola Lopomo; Cecilia Signorelli; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Tommaso Bonanzinga; Alberto Grassi; Federico Raggi; Andrea Visani; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2014-08-01

Review 4.  The Pivot Shift: Current Experimental Methodology and Clinical Utility for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture and Associated Injury.

Authors:  Nicholas J Vaudreuil; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Darren de Sa; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-03

5.  Methods to diagnose acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis of instrumented knee laxity tests.

Authors:  Carola F van Eck; Miette Loopik; Michel P van den Bekerom; Freddie H Fu; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The role of the iliotibial band during the pivot shift test.

Authors:  Eduardo M Suero; Innocent U Njoku; Marcia R Voigt; Jenny Lin; Dylan Koenig; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Quantitative evaluation of the pivot shift by image analysis using the iPad.

Authors:  Yuichi Hoshino; Paulo Araujo; Mattias Ahldén; Kristian Samuelsson; Bart Muller; Marcus Hofbauer; Megan R Wolf; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Quantifying the pivot shift test: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicola Lopomo; Stefano Zaffagnini; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Measurements of tibial rotation during a simulated pivot shift manoeuvre using a gyroscopic sensor.

Authors:  Frank A Petrigliano; Per Henrik Borgstrom; William J Kaiser; David R McAllister; Keith L Markolf
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination for anterior knee instability: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Leblanc; Marcin Kowalczuk; Nicole Andruszkiewicz; Nicole Simunovic; Forough Farrokhyar; Travis Lee Turnbull; Richard E Debski; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.