Literature DB >> 27304373

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in biomass-burning emissions and their contribution to light absorption and aerosol toxicity.

Vera Samburova1, Jessica Connolly2, Madhu Gyawali2, Reddy L N Yatavelli3, Adam C Watts2, Rajan K Chakrabarty4, Barbara Zielinska2, Hans Moosmüller2, Andrey Khlystov5.   

Abstract

In recent years, brown carbon (BrC) has been shown to be an important contributor to light absorption by biomass-burning atmospheric aerosols in the blue and near-ultraviolet (UV) part of the solar spectrum. Emission factors and optical properties of 113 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were determined for combustion of five globally important fuels: Alaskan, Siberian, and Florida swamp peat, cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), and ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) needles. The emission factors of total analyzed PAHs were between 1.9±0.43.0±0.6 and 9.6±1.2-42.2±5.4mgPAHkg(-1)fuel for particle- and gas phase, respectively. Spectrophotometric analysis of the identified PAHs showed that perinaphthenone, methylpyrenes, and pyrene contributed the most to the total PAH light absorption with 17.2%, 3.3 to 10.5%, and 7.6% of the total particle-phase PAH absorptivity averaged over analyzed emissions from the fuels. In the gas phase, the top three PAH contributors to BrC were acenaphthylene (32.6%), anthracene (8.2%), and 2,4,5-trimethylnaphthalene (8.0%). Overall, the identified PAHs were responsible for 0.087-0.16% (0.13% on average) and 0.033-0.15% (0.11% on average) of the total light absorption by dichloromethane-acetone extracts of particle and gas emissions, respectively. Toxic equivalency factor (TEF) analysis of 16 PAHs prioritized by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) showed that benzo(a)pyrene contributed the most to the PAH carcinogenic potency of particle phase emissions (61.8-67.4% to the total carcinogenic potency of Σ16EPA PAHs), while naphthalene played the major role in carcinogenicity of the gas phase PAHs in the biomass-burning emission analyzed here (35.4-46.0% to the total carcinogenic potency of Σ16EPA PAHs). The 16 EPA-prioritized PAHs contributed only 22.1±6.2% to total particle and 23.4±11% to total gas phase PAH mass, thus toxic properties of biomass-burning PAH emissions are most likely underestimated.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomass-burning; Brown carbon; Peat smoldering; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Potential carcinogen; UV–vis spectra

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27304373     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  8 in total

1.  Emission factors from different burning stages of agriculture wastes in Mexico.

Authors:  Naxieli Santiago-De la Rosa; Violeta Mugica-Álvarez; Francisco Cereceda-Balic; Fabián Guerrero; Karen Yáñez; Magin Lapuerta
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Excitation Emission Matrix Fluorescence Spectroscopy for Combustion Generated Particulate Matter Source Identification.

Authors:  Jay W Rutherford; Neal Dawson-Elli; Anne M Manicone; Gregory V Korshin; Igor V Novosselov; Edmund Seto; Jonathan D Posner
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Chemical composition, structures, and light absorption of N-containing aromatic compounds emitted from burning wood and charcoal in household cookstoves.

Authors:  Mingjie Xie; Zhenzhen Zhao; Amara L Holder; Michael D Hays; Xi Chen; Guofeng Shen; James J Jetter; Wyatt M Champion; Qin'geng Wang
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 6.133

4.  Emissions of Carbonaceous Particulate Matter and Ultrafine Particles from Vehicles-A Scientific Review in a Cross-Cutting Context of Air Pollution and Climate Change.

Authors:  Bertrand Bessagnet; Nadine Allemand; Jean-Philippe Putaud; Florian Couvidat; Jean-Marc André; David Simpson; Enrico Pisoni; Benjamin N Murphy; Philippe Thunis
Journal:  Appl Sci (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 2.838

5.  Composition and light absorption of N-containing aromatic compounds in organic aerosols from laboratory biomass burning.

Authors:  Mingjie Xie; Xi Chen; Michael D Hays; Amara L Holder
Journal:  Atmos Chem Phys       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 6.133

6.  Light-absorbing organic carbon from prescribed and laboratory biomass burning and gasoline vehicle emissions.

Authors:  Mingjie Xie; Michael D Hays; Amara L Holder
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Classroom Dust-Bound Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Jeddah Primary Schools, Saudi Arabia: Level, Characteristics and Health Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Mansour A Alghamdi; Salwa K Hassan; Noura A Alzahrani; Marwan Y Al Sharif; Mamdouh I Khoder
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Do 16 Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Represent PAH Air Toxicity?

Authors:  Vera Samburova; Barbara Zielinska; Andrey Khlystov
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2017-08-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.